I didn't read the entire thread, but I think homebrewing actually gave me better appreciation for consuming commercial beers. Yes, for the cost of half a case of a premium commercial beer, you can brew 2 cases. And many times it can be really good beer. But if you are like me, maybe now you appreciate those better commercial beers in a different way now. No?It's funny but when I first started brewing I thought to myself...I will never buy a commercial beer ever again. Then I saw some really good brewers going into our store and coming out with bottle after bottle of beer and thought to myself what gives? Now I have tons of really good commercial beers and only one homemade keg, albeit some bottles of my stuff.

The notion that home brewers can make beer better than commercial
#81
Posted 28 February 2013 - 01:14 PM
#82
Posted 28 February 2013 - 01:18 PM
Absolutely.I didn't read the entire thread, but I think homebrewing actually gave me better appreciation for consuming commercial beers. Yes, for the cost of half a case of a premium commercial beer, you can brew 2 cases. And many times it can be really good beer. But if you are like me, maybe now you appreciate those better commercial beers in a different way now. No?
#83
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:43 PM
#84
Posted 01 March 2013 - 05:06 AM
#85
Posted 01 March 2013 - 05:37 AM
#86
Posted 01 March 2013 - 06:00 AM
mutation.How did you develop that yeast strain?
#87
Posted 01 March 2013 - 08:29 AM
In BCS for most recipes JZ suggests pitching multiple yeast packs or making an "appropriate" starter.As a homebrewer, there are many things that I have to take on as a matter of faith. I look to the people who make the beer I like to drink and try to learn what they do and copy it.Yeast pitching rate is one of those subjects. I do not know how many billions of cells per liter per degree plato is enough. I can't count how many cells I am pitching. I have not done a test to confirm that X billion of cells is too little or too much. All I have is conventional wisdom, go with that and see what I end up with.I remember when the Mr Malty calculator first came out, people would run the numbers and announce that a vile of White Labs is no where near big enough. You had to make a 2 liter starter, step it up and pitch a quart of pure yeast slurry or your beer is going suck. White Labs and Wyeast are crooks and a bunch of liars. Oh my god, where can I get a 5 liter flask so I can make a decent starter? (OK - maybe some hyperbole there)I know I have direct pitched a single vile of WPL002 and the beer tasted exactly what I expected.Interesting that Jamilz (AKA Mr Malty) co-wrote a book with Chris White of White labs about yeast. I wish I could find my copy and see how they resolve the Mr Malty calculator against White Labs direct pitch vile.It would be interesting to see somebody do the experiment. Split 10 gallons of wort. 5 gallons get a single vile, direct pitched, the other 5 gallons gets what ever the monster starter Mr Malty tells us we need to make. Put the two carboys in the same space and let them go.Is there a difference between the two beers? Does one taste better than other?It would also be interesting to learn what Sierra Nevada uses for a pitch rate. molbasser strictly respects Sierra Nevada's proprietary information status for yeast pitching rate (which I respect) and will not comment on the subject.
#88
Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:38 AM
I have to say that my beer palate is evolving and improving. I do appreciate good beers now as well as the whole beer scene. I'm not sure, however, that I will be a prolific brewer. My best guess is that I will brew one every couple of months unless this whole thing clicks a bit better. Right now, I fret about brewing and find myself unable to sleep well the night before.I didn't read the entire thread, but I think homebrewing actually gave me better appreciation for consuming commercial beers. Yes, for the cost of half a case of a premium commercial beer, you can brew 2 cases. And many times it can be really good beer. But if you are like me, maybe now you appreciate those better commercial beers in a different way now. No?
#89
Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:45 AM
Just remember, it's supposed to be fun!Right now, I fret about brewing and find myself unable to sleep well the night before.
#90
Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:45 AM
#91
Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:46 AM
I've already discovered that it has little impact to my beers, so I'll continue on.Yeast pitching rate plays a huge part in fermentation. One day maybe you'll discover this Brewboy. You'll need to do a little research and homework, but it's nothing anybody else hasn't already done to find this out.
#92
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:07 AM
You should write a bookI've already discovered that it has little impact to my beers, so I'll continue on.
#93
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:11 AM
Thanks, but I'll leave that to the elitists.You should write a book
#94
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:14 AM
Yeah, that Palmer guy is such an elitist....Thanks, but I'll leave that to the elitists.
#95
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:14 AM
I wasn't referring to brewingThanks, but I'll leave that to the elitists.
#96
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:19 AM
When's your book being released?Yeah, that Palmer guy is such an elitist....
#97
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:19 AM
I wasn't either.I wasn't referring to brewing
#98
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:20 AM
There are many better brewers on here than I that I would listen to on this - my experience on this topic is that both sides of this debate are pretty much right. What a huge pitch rate does is makes any infection issue pretty much a non-starter - it doesn't in and of itself change the flavors or the end result (except by making it highly unlikely that the beer becomes infected and thus developing off tastes)If your sanitation is up to snuff, then a single sachet of Nottingham dried yeast will make nice beer.Yeast pitching rate plays a huge part in fermentation. One day maybe you'll discover this Brewboy. You'll need to do a little research and homework, but it's nothing anybody else hasn't already done to find this out.
#99
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:22 AM
Maybe you could do a website insteadI wasn't either.
#100
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:26 AM
I agree 100%. There are times when I come back to the fermenter in 4 hours and things are going strong. Other times, I'll have to come back in 24 to 48 hours before I see activity. I'll admit when it goes to 48 I start sweating a little, but so far so good (knock on wood). In the end, the beer tastes the same.There are many better brewers on here than I that I would listen to on this - my experience on this topic is that both sides of this debate are pretty much right. What a huge pitch rate does is makes any infection issue pretty much a non-starter - it doesn't in and of itself change the flavors or the end result (except by making it highly unlikely that the beer becomes infected and thus developing off tastes)If your sanitation is up to snuff, then a single sachet of Nottingham dried yeast will make nice beer.
Edited by brewboy, 01 March 2013 - 11:27 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users