True that. Unfortunately it will be a little while before this one gets served up. Hopefully in a month or twoKa-Ching!
Memory Lapse Pale Ale...
#21
Posted 10 April 2009 - 10:56 AM
#22
Posted 10 April 2009 - 03:23 PM
#23
Posted 10 April 2009 - 07:17 PM
Honestly i've only ever dry hopped with pellets, put them in near the end of primary or rack onto them in secondary, they will settle out fairly quickly, just be judicious with the racking cane so as not to disturb the sediment and you are golden.Damn right. Bring the 'Hood back to the hood. You know, I have never done it, but dry hopping with Mt. Hood sounds like it would be really nice. Can you see dry hopping with Mt. Hood pellets? I don't usually have whole/leaf hops around. Cheers.
#24
Posted 10 April 2009 - 07:25 PM
#25
Posted 11 April 2009 - 02:49 AM
Why mess with a good thing right? :devil:I actually upped my IBUs a little bit compared to Ken but I also upped the malt a little so hopefully it will all even out. I hate ordering non-integer amounts of grain b/c Austin charges a slightly higher rate for them.This beer is quite good with the Mt. Hood but any sub will yield a result that showcases the hop you pick. I think columbus would be fine but try to stick to the 5-5.5 AAUs that Ken uses in his initial recipe. I feel that this beer is really well balanced as posted so if you are going to sub maybe use 5.5 AAUs columbus bittering and if you want a little aroma in there then dry hop with what's left.
#26
Posted 11 April 2009 - 03:56 PM
#27
Posted 12 April 2009 - 10:52 AM
Edited by badogg, 12 April 2009 - 11:00 AM.
#28
Posted 12 April 2009 - 11:04 AM
#29
Posted 12 April 2009 - 11:11 AM
Doh! I totally missed the 60L on the front page when I wrote it down on the way out the door to the LHBS. I swear, I gotta start paying more attention to things these days. Too much going on lately.the recipe calls for crystal 60, so anything lighter than that will yield a lighter final SRM dude.
#30
Posted 12 April 2009 - 11:21 AM
#31
Posted 13 April 2009 - 02:35 PM
#32
Posted 13 April 2009 - 05:08 PM
Refreshing... absolutely. Crisp? It depends on what your definition of "crisp" is. I would call it balanced and refreshing and I might save "crisp" for something that has late hops added. I think the one addition of Mt. Hoods bitters this beer perfectly so I would go with "balanced". The only issue with this beer is if you serve it with low carbonation... it tends to taste too malty. Some of the bottles I have (bottled from a keg with a cobra tap) taste a little low on hops because carbonation usually emphasizes the hop character of the beer. I've got a keg of it that will fill a draft-fridge vacancy in a few days. Cheers.So Ken,Should I expect this to be a crisp and refreshing kind of drink? I've got a different pale ale right now that despite being very hoppy, everyone that tries it is like woah, that's crisp and refreshing! I'm finding I really like this for post yard work type drinking.
#33
Posted 13 April 2009 - 05:10 PM
I guess by crisp I'm kind of referring to dryness.Refreshing... absolutely. Crisp? It depends on what your definition of "crisp" is. I would call it balanced and refreshing and I might save "crisp" for something that has late hops added. I think the one addition of Mt. Hoods bitters this beer perfectly so I would go with "balanced". The only issue with this beer is if you serve it with low carbonation... it tends to taste too malty. Some of the bottles I have (bottled from a keg with a cobra tap) taste a little low on hops because carbonation usually emphasizes the hop character of the beer. I've got a keg of it that will fill a draft-fridge vacancy in a few days. Cheers.
#34
Posted 13 April 2009 - 05:17 PM
#35
Posted 13 April 2009 - 06:41 PM
US-05 would make it drier than 1056 or WLP001 because it seems to attenuate better. Also, it would depend on where you mashed it. If you mashed it 148-150°, it would be drier. Most of my mash temps for this beer end up right around 152° which adds a little more body and probably makes it a little maltier.NCbeerbrewer... keep me posted. I hope it comes out tasty. Cheers!I guess by crisp I'm kind of referring to dryness.
#36
Posted 14 April 2009 - 02:05 PM
agreed...I made 2 versions of this the past few weeks both with US-05 they both wound up at about 1.008...My first batch I think I didn't stir my mash well enough and started with 1.047 second started at 1.052...the grain bills were upped a little as I like a little more alcohol in my brew than Ken...haI also love the idea of using a single hop...I made the first batch with Mt. Rainier and the 2nd with Santiam....I like it so much that I just brewed up a Red on sunday with only Mt. Rainiers. Now I will have an idea of these newer hops.I bottled the first batch last friday and the sample tasted great...i can't wait to try my version carbed...US-05 would make it drier than 1056 or WLP001 because it seems to attenuate better. Also, it would depend on where you mashed it. If you mashed it 148-150°, it would be drier. Most of my mash temps for this beer end up right around 152° which adds a little more body and probably makes it a little maltier.NCbeerbrewer... keep me posted. I hope it comes out tasty. Cheers!
#37
Posted 15 April 2009 - 03:42 PM
#38
Posted 15 April 2009 - 04:26 PM
#39
Posted 15 April 2009 - 05:37 PM
from the reipe alone, i can'r see why anyone would hate it, it's very balanced IMO, there's no over the top or meh to it's recipication.ive yet to hear anybody who doesnt like this brew.
#40
Posted 15 April 2009 - 07:20 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users