Post a picture of your pint...
#801
Posted 16 February 2017 - 06:37 PM
#802
Posted 16 February 2017 - 06:57 PM
#803
Posted 17 February 2017 - 09:46 PM
And if we're being totally honest, that's not head, it's foam
#804
Posted 18 February 2017 - 09:17 AM
Imperial blonde.
And if we're being totally honest, that's not head, it's foam
no worries. how does it taste?
#805
Posted 18 February 2017 - 02:06 PM
#806
Posted 18 February 2017 - 02:14 PM
Pretty good. Could be a tiny bit hoppier but I like it well enough.
I wouldn't normally think of a blonde as all that hoppy but I don't remember the recipe either.
#807
Posted 18 February 2017 - 04:25 PM
#808
Posted 18 February 2017 - 04:28 PM
There are hoppy blondes and I make them on a regular basis. Stain, your beer looks darker than blonde beers that I make but that's a different conversation.
I would guess that is the result of "imperial" gravity and extract.(possibly added at 60 min in the boil)
#809
Posted 18 February 2017 - 06:37 PM
#810
Posted 18 February 2017 - 06:56 PM
This is the batch that you brewed the same weekend I did? Going to keg mine tomorrow. Wasn't really in a hurry because I'm serving at a wedding on the 25th.Hazy batch of Waterpark... Very happy how the New England style beer is drinking.
#811
Posted 18 February 2017 - 07:27 PM
This is the batch that you brewed the same weekend I did? Going to keg mine tomorrow. Wasn't really in a hurry because I'm serving at a wedding on the 25th.
Indeed it is. I moved it to the serving keg on 2-11. I will have to take it off since I want it around for a birthday party early March but I had to sample for QC!
#812
Posted 19 February 2017 - 06:58 AM
I would guess that is the result of "imperial" gravity and extract.(possibly added at 60 min in the boil)
This
#813
Posted 19 February 2017 - 09:16 AM
English Brown ready for primetime. Really happy with it, came out fantastic. Its going to travel with us this week and will likely be gone by Sunday.
#814
Posted 19 February 2017 - 10:37 AM
#815
Posted 19 February 2017 - 11:13 AM
Looks nice. Is it 'roasty'?
No, not strongly so. Its MO, TF dark crystal 85L, Pale Chocolate and torrified wheat. There is some really nice toasty chocolate character and very light coffee-like notes from the pale chocolate and some toffee and bread. None of the dark roasted stuff or acrid character you gan get from the darker roasted malts.
ETA: As usual, it's also not quite as dark as the picture suggests. It's a deep ruby color.
Edited by neddles, 19 February 2017 - 11:16 AM.
#816
Posted 19 February 2017 - 11:42 AM
No, not strongly so. Its MO, TF dark crystal 85L, Pale Chocolate and torrified wheat. There is some really nice toasty chocolate character and very light coffee-like notes from the pale chocolate and some toffee and bread. None of the dark roasted stuff or acrid character you gan get from the darker roasted malts.
ETA: As usual, it's also not quite as dark as the picture suggests. It's a deep ruby color.
maybe try to get more back lighting? I usually do that and manually tell the camera I want a longer exposure.
#817
Posted 19 February 2017 - 11:55 AM
maybe try to get more back lighting? I usually do that and manually tell the camera I want a longer exposure.
I know what you mean...I did my best for my basement at night. Trouble is I take all my pics with my iPhone so I am limited on exposure control. I guess I'll have to pour a half pint here this afternoon and try it again. Dammit!
#818
Posted 19 February 2017 - 12:00 PM
I know what you mean...I did my best for my basement at night. Trouble is I take all my pics with my iPhone so I am limited on exposure control. I guess I'll have to pour a half pint here this afternoon and try it again. Dammit!
does the iphone app have a "brightness" compensation type control?
#819
Posted 19 February 2017 - 12:05 PM
does the iphone app have a "brightness" compensation type control?
Yeah but IMO it doesn't work well in low light conditions.
#820
Posted 19 February 2017 - 12:41 PM
Yeah but IMO it doesn't work well in low light conditions.
huh - I thought apple phones were supposed to have really good cameras.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users