NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
I hope it comes back
Posted 25 January 2014 - 02:00 PM
NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
I hope it comes back
Posted 25 January 2014 - 02:56 PM
You can use mrmalty in the meantime
Posted 25 January 2014 - 03:34 PM
Posted 25 January 2014 - 03:36 PM
I'm partial to kai's stir plate calculation. Today is just a step up so as long as I can back calculate what I grew later I'm good.You can use mrmalty in the meantime
Posted 25 January 2014 - 04:02 PM
I'm partial to kai's stir plate calculation. Today is just a step up so as long as I can back calculate what I grew later I'm good.
I get it. After a while though you just don't bother. I know what works here almost all of the time. Most of the data you feed those calculators is just a guess anyway.
Posted 25 January 2014 - 04:33 PM
I get it. After a while though you just don't bother. I know what works here almost all of the time. Most of the data you feed those calculators is just a guess anyway.
This!
Posted 25 January 2014 - 04:49 PM
I get it. After a while though you just don't bother. I know what works here almost all of the time. Most of the data you feed those calculators is just a guess anyway.
i know it's an estimate but it puts me in relatively the same place in relation to gravity. if i found that i thought that using yeastcalc i was over or under pitching i'd offset myself based on that but so far it seems to be somewhere in range so if it aint broke i won't go ahead and break it myself.
Posted 25 January 2014 - 05:38 PM
You worry to much, really. Relax, don't worry, have a homebrew.
Posted 25 January 2014 - 05:49 PM
You worry to much, really. Relax, don't worry, have a homebrew.
i figure this is part of why most of my beer comes out pretty good.
Posted 25 January 2014 - 08:44 PM
Edited by BlKtRe, 25 January 2014 - 08:44 PM.
Posted 26 January 2014 - 04:02 AM
if i didn't use yeastcalc or something similar i'd just be trying to do some kind of estimate in my head. the estimate would never be as easy as just punching the numbers in and following the estimate that the calculator spits out at me.
do you guys just make the same size starter all the time or do you make bigger or smaller starters based on the beer?
Posted 26 January 2014 - 04:07 AM
also yeastcalc.com is still down!!!
Posted 26 January 2014 - 07:34 AM
I always use Mr. Malty. I'm sure if I just made a big starter every time my beers would be great, but it's nice to have a reference. As always, what is 'necessary' is dependent on what your goals are. It's far from necessary to pitch at 75MM cells/mL-°P on every batch to get great beer, but if you do it you take out one variable if you're trying to optimize your brewing.
Posted 26 January 2014 - 07:38 AM
also yeastcalc.com is still down!!!
Clearly what you need to do when it comes back up is put in every possible permutation, record the results and reverse engineer the calculator on your own.
(I've considered doing it with the Mr. Malty calculator. )
Posted 26 January 2014 - 08:47 AM
i think brewers friend has the same yeast calculator. i'm not sure though...
Posted 26 January 2014 - 10:36 AM
Wait .. you use yeast?
Posted 26 January 2014 - 01:40 PM
I've never felt the need to use a yeast calc.
This.
Posted 26 January 2014 - 02:44 PM
This.
I use mrmalty sometimes, but mainly I know that if I make a 2-3 qt. starter (depending on the OG of the beer) I'll be fine.
Posted 26 January 2014 - 03:18 PM
I use mrmalty sometimes, but mainly I know that if I make a 2-3 qt. starter (depending on the OG of the beer) I'll be fine.
And this.
Posted 26 January 2014 - 08:28 PM
Yup. Figured this out before yeast calcs were around.I use mrmalty sometimes, but mainly I know that if I make a 2-3 qt. starter (depending on the OG of the beer) I'll be fine.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users