How big is your box and how cold can you go?Well, the total amount of time it runs to keep the cooler at whatever temperature has to be the same no matter which way you do it. Hanging it in the air will keep the air temperature more consistent because that is what you are controlling. The gel will take longer to cool by which time the air is colder than your setpoint. And then the air will have to get warmer than your setpoint because the gel takes longer to warm up. I'll continue to keep mine hanging in the air.Since it will take longer to chill the gel, I think you will have more freezeups than if it is a shorter cycle controlling the air. And I do want the fridge to chill after I have warmed up the air by opening the door. That's kinda the whole point.

Walk-in Cooler
#101
Posted 27 July 2011 - 12:26 PM
#102
Posted 27 July 2011 - 12:30 PM
#103
Posted 27 July 2011 - 12:58 PM
#104
Posted 27 July 2011 - 01:23 PM
Or, looking at it from the other side, the shorter the cycle, the less chance for ice to build up in the first place.For me, I prefer longer cycles, especially with the thermal load that I have in the cooler. The longer off cycle in my mind is what allows any ice that built up to melt and evaporate. If you have short cycles, it doesn't give enough time for the ice to melt off.
#105
Posted 27 July 2011 - 01:39 PM
My chamber isn't as big as these guys have. I had icing problems when the bulb was in the fermenter and when it was in the air. I have it wrapped in a freezable pack for now. Haven't had an iceup in years. But mine's analog and I'd have to look to see what the differential is set at.Or, looking at it from the other side, the shorter the cycle, the less chance for ice to build up in the first place.
#106
Posted 27 July 2011 - 02:00 PM
I don't think it is that simple. Even in a short amount of time with the air conditioner on, I believe that the coils themselves can get below freezing very quickly even if the air coming out isn't below freezing. If you have a short cycle, the coils will still get to below freezing and start forming ice. If you also have a short off cycle, then that ice will stay there, as there will be latent cooling in the coils for a while after the air conditioner is turned off, and there is no air flow (unless you have attached separate fans like I have), which allows the air to stratify around the coils, and ultimately around the ice.So with the short cycles, you may not produce as much ice each time the air conditioner is on, but it will build up a lot faster than with longer cycles because of no time to be able to defrost.And to touch on reliability again - the shorter the cycles, the sooner the air conditioner will die. I've invested quite a bit of money into this walk-in, and each of the air conditioners were just a bit over $200, which I would rather not have to pay for again any time soon.If you are able to get your cooler to work as you desire with those settings, then that is awesome. For me though, this is how my system is working best right now with the longer cycles.Or, looking at it from the other side, the shorter the cycle, the less chance for ice to build up in the first place.
#107
Posted 27 July 2011 - 04:19 PM
I think everyone's setup using these to cool is different, and there isn't a set approach. After all, they're not meant to be doing what we are using them for.And, this is the time of year to start looking for stock the stores want to unload. I recently bought a 5000 BTU analog unit from Sears for just under $100.00 + tax. Sooner or later I'll need it in a hurry when the other dies.I don't think it is that simple. Even in a short amount of time with the air conditioner on, I believe that the coils themselves can get below freezing very quickly even if the air coming out isn't below freezing. If you have a short cycle, the coils will still get to below freezing and start forming ice. If you also have a short off cycle, then that ice will stay there, as there will be latent cooling in the coils for a while after the air conditioner is turned off, and there is no air flow (unless you have attached separate fans like I have), which allows the air to stratify around the coils, and ultimately around the ice.So with the short cycles, you may not produce as much ice each time the air conditioner is on, but it will build up a lot faster than with longer cycles because of no time to be able to defrost.And to touch on reliability again - the shorter the cycles, the sooner the air conditioner will die. I've invested quite a bit of money into this walk-in, and each of the air conditioners were just a bit over $200, which I would rather not have to pay for again any time soon.If you are able to get your cooler to work as you desire with those settings, then that is awesome. For me though, this is how my system is working best right now with the longer cycles.
#108
Posted 27 July 2011 - 04:23 PM
#109
Posted 27 July 2011 - 05:54 PM
#110
Posted 27 July 2011 - 06:04 PM
#111
Posted 27 July 2011 - 06:07 PM
#112
Posted 27 July 2011 - 06:15 PM
#113
Posted 05 August 2011 - 10:22 AM



#114
Posted 18 October 2011 - 05:53 PM
#115
Posted 22 November 2011 - 02:25 PM



#116
Posted 22 November 2011 - 02:30 PM
just 14 taps.... ppfffftttt!!!I am pretty happy with 14 as it is now.

#117
Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:24 PM
Is the rest of the area going to be a mancave? 14 taps at home is just unreal.Cheers,RichI finished up the first row! I now have 14 faucets, all stainless hardware except for the stout faucet.
I actually still have a number of kegs that I can add, so I may be adding more faucets in the future, but it won't be as high of a priority for me. I am pretty happy with 14 as it is now.
#118
Posted 23 November 2011 - 02:08 PM
#119
Posted 24 November 2011 - 04:20 AM
#120
Posted 24 November 2011 - 09:14 AM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users