Beer gas
#21
Posted 27 July 2010 - 08:29 PM
#22
Posted 28 July 2010 - 08:51 AM
So why wouldn't they fill the CO2 tank all the way up?One cubic foot is 7.5 gallons. Liquid CO2 at room temp has a density of about 6.5 lb/gal. 5# will occupy about 0.8 gallon.
#23
Posted 28 July 2010 - 08:57 AM
#24
Posted 28 July 2010 - 09:12 AM
Ok, I thought he was saying that a 5# tank had 18.5 ft3 of volume. Let me go back and re-parse his last couple of posts. What I was trying to say is that in a freshly filled 5# tank, however much volume is in there is all liquid.Yes, it is stored as pressurized liquid in the tank. I think what JKoravos is calculating is when all of that liquid CO2 is vaporized and is in gas form at STP, it will occupy 18.5 cubic feet. I haven't done the calculation, that is just what I am assuming he did (convert lbs to g, divide by molar mass, multiply by 22.4 L, convert to cubic feet). From there he just calculated the average volumes of CO2 that are in solution to find how many gallons/kegs a 5# tank could pressurize.
#25
Posted 28 July 2010 - 09:12 AM
Pour a beer, then suck some of the beer up into the syringe. Then shoot it back into the beer, below the surface. Before Guinness used nitro, their beers came packaged with a syringe.How does one use a syringe? Do you pour the beer, then fill the syringe, then empty the syringe into the beer?
#26
Posted 28 July 2010 - 09:27 AM
what sort of syringe do you use? I've tried one that's intended for injecting meat a couple of times. it works okay but smaller holes might work better.Pour a beer, then suck some of the beer up into the syringe. Then shoot it back into the beer, below the surface. Before Guinness used nitro, their beers came packaged with a syringe.
#27
Posted 28 July 2010 - 10:18 AM
I was saying that the amount of gas you get out of a 5# tank is 18.5 cubic feet. I did exactly what gnef described to calculate that number.Ok, I thought he was saying that a 5# tank had 18.5 ft3 of volume. Let me go back and re-parse his last couple of posts. What I was trying to say is that in a freshly filled 5# tank, however much volume is in there is all liquid.
#28
Posted 28 July 2010 - 10:30 AM
I use a smallish one. Don't recall the exact size.what sort of syringe do you use? I've tried one that's intended for injecting meat a couple of times. it works okay but smaller holes might work better.
#29
Posted 28 July 2010 - 11:03 AM
Why on Earth would one measure a compressible gas in terms of volume?No, I have a separate 80 cubic foot cylinder for the beer gas. As far as how much gas you get, a 5# CO2 tank has about 18.5 cubic feet of gas. So the 80 cubic foot tank actually has 20 cubic feet of CO2, only slightly more than 5# liquid co2 tank, but you typically carb beer gas beer less, maybe 1.5 volumes vs. 2.2 volumes for other beers.Using those number the volume of beer carbed with a beer gas tank compared to a 5# liquid tank is:(20/18.5)*(2.2/1.5)=1.6 times as much beer carbed with an 80CF beer gas tank.Of course, the biggest difference is that I only have one stout tap so it'll be something like a 5 to 1 ratio of normal carbed beers versus beer gas carbed. If you're ONLY carbing your beer, a 5# tank will carb 140 gallons of beer to 2.2 volumes. Of course, I do a lot more things than carb beer. I'm sure I blow through a lot of CO2 in purging and CO2 transfers. I won't be doing as much of that with the beer gas. My guess is the beer gas will last 10+ batches. That's likely 2 or 3 years of beer gas beer.
Yes, it is stored as pressurized liquid in the tank. I think what JKoravos is calculating is when all of that liquid CO2 is vaporized and is in gas form at STP, it will occupy 18.5 cubic feet. I haven't done the calculation, that is just what I am assuming he did (convert lbs to g, divide by molar mass, multiply by 22.4 L, convert to cubic feet). From there he just calculated the average volumes of CO2 that are in solution to find how many gallons/kegs a 5# tank could pressurize.
I guess this makes sense, but I still question the logic behind stating the amount of gas in terms of volume. Mass seems like a much more appropriate way to state how much there is.I was saying that the amount of gas you get out of a 5# tank is 18.5 cubic feet. I did exactly what gnef described to calculate that number.
#30
Posted 28 July 2010 - 11:13 AM
#31
Posted 28 July 2010 - 11:24 AM
Volume @ STP is just as good as mass, all you need is consistent units. Beer gas I believe is sold by volume, not by weight, but it's been over a year since I picked some up. As for why JK converted in one direction and not the other, my guess is that it makes the math easier when you deal with a pure gas rather than a mixed gas.Why on Earth would one measure a compressible gas in terms of volume?I guess this makes sense, but I still question the logic behind stating the amount of gas in terms of volume. Mass seems like a much more appropriate way to state how much there is.
#32
Posted 28 July 2010 - 11:34 AM
Eh, careful with that. "Volumes of CO2" is not a measurement of volume, it's base units would be mass/volume, or grams/liter. 1 Volume of CO2 = 2 grams/liter of CO2. The volume in question in that unit is a relative volume. I'm not certain how I would take cu. ft. of CO2 and calculate carbonation levels in a straight forward way, but maybe I just have not thought it through.Let me see... let's forget cu.ft. and go with L, so I've got say 20L of CO2, and I want to carbonate at 2 Volumes, so I assume it's... 20L / 2 Volumes = 10 L/volume, see already my units are a little funky. Hmm, so I guess the implication is that I can carbonate 10L of beer at that level?Er, no... it should be like 20 L of CO2, 10 L of beer, = 2 volume of CO2 that I can carbonate too? I dunno, I'll have to think this through when I'm not on a train and drinking It might work, I've just never thought about it that way before.Edit: cuz 10 L/volume = 10 L^2/gram, I'll wrap my head around this at some point though.the usefulness of stating the amount of gas by volume is that is how we talk about levels of carbonation in our beers: 1.5 volumes, 2.2 volumes, etc. Using that, we can figure out how many gallons of beer we can carbonate using what size CO2 tank (this assumes no waste or the pressure to serve either).This is also how the industrial tanks are measured: I have an 80 cubic foot beergas tank like JKoravos, which is the largest I can get locally. To move up to 120 Cf, airgas said those were only possible to go to bars, they wouldn't even let me purchase one.
#33
Posted 28 July 2010 - 12:27 PM
#34
Posted 28 July 2010 - 01:20 PM
The way I've seen volume of CO2 defined is as the volume of CO2 at STP dissolved into the equivalent volume of beer. for example, 10 gallons of CO2 at STP dissolved into 5 gallons of beer is 2 volumes of carbonation. I've never seen the 2g/liter number.Although, 2 grams of CO2 at STP is 1.02 liters, so for all intents and purposes m/v and v/v are the same in this case.Eh, careful with that. "Volumes of CO2" is not a measurement of volume, it's base units would be mass/volume, or grams/liter. 1 Volume of CO2 = 2 grams/liter of CO2.
#35
Posted 28 July 2010 - 01:22 PM
STP is implied in the definition of volumes. Stating the volume of gas under a known temperature and pressure is the same as stating the quantity as a mass.Why on Earth would one measure a compressible gas in terms of volume?I guess this makes sense, but I still question the logic behind stating the amount of gas in terms of volume. Mass seems like a much more appropriate way to state how much there is.
#36
Posted 28 July 2010 - 02:21 PM
Yeah, I don't know what my brain was doing... beer is cheaper on the train than in the city so that might have something to do with it. Sorry for all the sidetracking.The way I've seen volume of CO2 defined is as the volume of CO2 at STP dissolved into the equivalent volume of beer. for example, 10 gallons of CO2 at STP dissolved into 5 gallons of beer is 2 volumes of carbonation. I've never seen the 2g/liter number.Although, 2 grams of CO2 at STP is 1.02 liters, so for all intents and purposes m/v and v/v are the same in this case.
#37
Posted 28 July 2010 - 04:09 PM
I guess I don't hang out around gassy people enough to know that STP is implied. Carry on.STP is implied in the definition of volumes. Stating the volume of gas under a known temperature and pressure is the same as stating the quantity as a mass.
#38
Posted 28 July 2010 - 04:24 PM
I use one that i got at the farm supply down the road, it has a 1/2 inch pluger, does the trick nicely, just suck it half full of stout, and quickly discharge into the beer and watch the cascade actionI use a smallish one. Don't recall the exact size.
#39
Posted 29 July 2010 - 06:39 AM
I prefer slugs.Then you need to start using units of kg or g instead of pounds.
#40
Posted 29 July 2010 - 06:49 AM
It should be 25% CO2 and 75% N2.Only if you know the percent composition. Do you know the ratio of CO2 to NO2 in your beer gas?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users