Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Can Someone Teach Me About Pale Ales and IPAs?


  • Please log in to reply
236 replies to this topic

#61 Clintama

Clintama

    No Life

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30244 posts
  • LocationRight Here

Posted 14 June 2013 - 01:35 PM

I think the reason people don't use US-05 @50F for a clean fermentation is because they can get clean ale at 65F in 4 days instead of 3 weeks.

The point I'm making is that it's as clean, if not cleaner, then 1056 when fermented at that temperature.



#62 MolBasser

MolBasser

    Comptrolled by Seahawks

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15351 posts
  • LocationChico, CA

Posted 14 June 2013 - 06:55 PM

Or at least 1056. I am not a big fan of 05 any more.

 

Same yeast as wlp001

traditionally Steam Beer was lager yeast brewed by necessity at ale temps due to the non availability of cooling technology, correct?

crap, yeah, my bad.

 

MolBasser



#63 Clintama

Clintama

    No Life

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30244 posts
  • LocationRight Here

Posted 14 June 2013 - 07:46 PM

 

 

crap, yeah, my bad.

 

MolBasser

Those damn PHD's have a way of failing you when you need them. :D



#64 MolBasser

MolBasser

    Comptrolled by Seahawks

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15351 posts
  • LocationChico, CA

Posted 14 June 2013 - 09:28 PM

Don't you know it!?

 

:)

 

MolBasser



#65 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9101 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 15 June 2013 - 10:02 AM

 

Same yeast as wlp001

crap, yeah, my bad.

 

MolBasser

 

Yeah, I know they had the same origin.  I think that due to time there has been a bit of divergence of flavor.



#66 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9101 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 15 June 2013 - 11:57 AM

The point I'm making is that it's as clean, if not cleaner, then 1056 when fermented at that temperature.

In your case, it might make sense since you already have a space at that temp. For me (and most others, I suspect) using a cleaner (to my tastes) yeast at a higher temp makes more sense.

#67 Mya

Mya

    Cheap Blue Meanie

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68964 posts
  • LocationSpokane, WA

Posted 15 June 2013 - 08:39 PM

In your case, it might make sense since you already have a space at that temp. For me (and most others, I suspect) using a cleaner (to my tastes) yeast at a higher temp makes more sense.

1450!



#68 MolBasser

MolBasser

    Comptrolled by Seahawks

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15351 posts
  • LocationChico, CA

Posted 15 June 2013 - 09:23 PM

For ale, fermenting longer than 5 days is an exception.

 

Pale Ales and IPAs should be done within 5 days as a rule or you are doing something wrong.

 

Other styles of beer or whatever you want to do is fine, but pale ales and IPAs need to be done in 5 days.

 

MolBasser



#69 Mya

Mya

    Cheap Blue Meanie

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68964 posts
  • LocationSpokane, WA

Posted 15 June 2013 - 09:25 PM

For ale, fermenting longer than 5 days is an exception.

 

Pale Ales and IPAs should be done within 5 days as a rule or you are doing something wrong.

 

Other styles of beer or whatever you want to do is fine, but pale ales and IPAs need to be done in 5 days.

 

MolBasser

what is your definition of done?



#70 MolBasser

MolBasser

    Comptrolled by Seahawks

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15351 posts
  • LocationChico, CA

Posted 15 June 2013 - 09:58 PM

Fermented to completion.

 

Based on sugar content.  Obviously the beer isn't done as it needs to be chill proofed, but the fermentation is done in less than 5 days.

 

MolBasser



#71 Mya

Mya

    Cheap Blue Meanie

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68964 posts
  • LocationSpokane, WA

Posted 15 June 2013 - 10:13 PM

Fermented to completion.

 

Based on sugar content.  Obviously the beer isn't done as it needs to be chill proofed, but the fermentation is done in less than 5 days.

 

MolBasser

gotcha

 

 

chill proofing is accomplished how?


Edited by miccullen, 15 June 2013 - 10:23 PM.


#72 SchwanzBrewer

SchwanzBrewer

    Grand Duke of Inappropriate Announcements

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34299 posts
  • LocationKnee deep in business plans

Posted 16 June 2013 - 05:45 AM

gotcha

 

 

chill proofing is accomplished how?

 

They give the fermenters a license to chill.



#73 Mya

Mya

    Cheap Blue Meanie

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68964 posts
  • LocationSpokane, WA

Posted 16 June 2013 - 09:31 AM

 

They give the fermenters a license to chill.

:blush:  :blush:



#74 StankDelicious

StankDelicious

    Comptroller of BigBossMan

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 14017 posts
  • LocationMarylandistan

Posted 16 June 2013 - 07:29 PM

Or at least 1056. I am not a big fan of 05 any more.

 

Add me to the 1056 fan club. Love that yeast.



#75 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 69521 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 17 June 2013 - 02:50 AM

 

Add me to the 1056 fan club. Love that yeast.

 

need to get some of that again.  it will be a trip back in time!



#76 Gus13

Gus13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 294 posts
  • LocationMississippi

Posted 17 June 2013 - 07:16 AM

I think I'm going to attempt this with a SMaSH brew first.  Some Marris Otter and Citra hops.  No dry hopping this time.  Just a straight forward brew.



#77 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9101 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 17 June 2013 - 08:59 AM

I think I'm going to attempt this with a SMaSH brew first.  Some Marris Otter and Citra hops.  No dry hopping this time.  Just a straight forward brew.

 

In a recent Zymurgy, Vinnie Cilurzo (IIRC) remarked that's a great way to learn about ingredients, but a lousy recipe for beer.  I agree with him.



#78 Gus13

Gus13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 294 posts
  • LocationMississippi

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:06 AM

 

In a recent Zymurgy, Vinnie Cilurzo (IIRC) remarked that's a great way to learn about ingredients, but a lousy recipe for beer.  I agree with him.

 

 

I think that's where I saw it.  Or heard about it on a BeerSmith podcast. 

 

I'm also wondering something about cold crashing.  I cold crashed my BDSA for 6 days at around 38F to clarify the brew.  Since I did that it took a couple months in a bottle for it even to show traits of carbonation.  If you cold crash PA or IPA brews, will it do the same?  Worried about cold crashing too much before dry hopping and losing too much yeast.



#79 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 17881 posts

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:11 AM

 

 

I think that's where I saw it.  Or heard about it on a BeerSmith podcast. 

 

I'm also wondering something about cold crashing.  I cold crashed my BDSA for 6 days at around 38F to clarify the brew.  Since I did that it took a couple months in a bottle for it even to show traits of carbonation.  If you cold crash PA or IPA brews, will it do the same?  Worried about cold crashing too much before dry hopping and losing too much yeast.

Good chance your BDSA took so long to carbonate because of the %ABV and not because of the cold crashing. How strong was the ABV?

 

Normal %ABV PAs and IPAs will carbonate just fine with 2-3 wks in the bottle even after 6 days of cold crashing. If you cold crashed for longer, say, a month or 2 then I would be more concerned.

 

My 9.2% RIS took 2 months to fully carbonate in the bottle. 


Edited by ettels4, 17 June 2013 - 09:12 AM.


#80 Mya

Mya

    Cheap Blue Meanie

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68964 posts
  • LocationSpokane, WA

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:33 AM

 

In a recent Zymurgy, Vinnie Cilurzo (IIRC) remarked that's a great way to learn about ingredients, but a lousy recipe for beer.  I agree with him.

agreed




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users