
WM&C Inagural group brew: Hightest's Blueberry Braggot
#21
Posted 08 April 2009 - 04:45 AM
#22
Posted 09 April 2009 - 12:02 PM
#23
Posted 12 April 2009 - 08:55 AM
I'm curious as to the c-120 and S-B? The Light DME is going to give a light SRM while your grain bill is going to give something a little darker. I get SRM v. 17.Maybe 1lb of c-20?Or do they complement the blueberries?I don't think anyone threw up the AG conversion yet:HT's recipe is calling for 5# light DME in 4.5gal water which is ~1.051.Based on a 76% mash efficiency you're looking at something like this to get 4.5gal of 1.051 wort:7.5# 2row.5# crystal 120.5# special BProbably do something like mash at 148 for a dry fermentation. Run off 18.5qts (.5qt for boil off) and boil for 5-10min to kill off anything before chilling to something like 100deg and adding honey.OR run off 16qts and plan to top up the batch after adding the honey with 2-2.5qts water.My thoughts anyways.
#24
Posted 12 April 2009 - 05:54 PM
I was only converting HT's recipe over to all grain, I didn't make up/alter those specialty grains. I've never brewed this so I can't comment.I'm curious as to the c-120 and S-B? The Light DME is going to give a light SRM while your grain bill is going to give something a little darker. I get SRM v. 17.Maybe 1lb of c-20?Or do they complement the blueberries?
#25
Posted 12 April 2009 - 06:24 PM
I'll egt in if I get the E-Mail back from a new local honey Supplier I found, thr GF is a blueberry fanatic, this is up her alley.I assume frozen blueberries will be Ok for this? (never mind I read the recipe now) I go the beer side of it covered.In answer to Guest's comment on the boiling of the wort pre honey, i would assume that the AG version would need boiling at least a 30 minute boild but i may be wrong.hightest, what do you say?The recipe: Hightest's Blueberry BraggotMost popular starting time frame: May 23rd-30thWe have some time between now and when most people will be kicking this one off so I decided to start this as a planning thread. If you have any questions or comments about the recipe, process, where to find ingredients.... then post them up here. I'll start a separate results thread when we get closer to the start date.Also so we can keep a running tab of all those participating please post here that you're in. If you are planning to start this outside of the May 23rd-30th time frame add that info too. Since we got a good turnout for this group brew it would be great to have everybody start close together but we all know how brew schedules can be! If there is a group that needs to start this sooner or not at all I can start an early bird results thread and merge the two later.
Edited by mikeinspokane, 12 April 2009 - 06:27 PM.
#26
Posted 12 April 2009 - 06:28 PM
I assume because technically DME has ben boiled once already, other than that, I dunno.Why do we not need to boil the wort (extract version), pre-honey addition? What about the hot-break?
#27
Posted 13 April 2009 - 04:56 AM
I would consider the reasons for boiling a wort - boiling precipitates protein, isomerizes hop acids, concentrates wort gravity, volatilizes undesirable malt & hop aromas, increases wort flavor & color, and sterilizes the wort. While the hop-based reasons do not apply, I beleive the remaining reasons provide worthwhile benefits and justify boiling the wort - especially when going all-grain. Yes, I would boil the wort, However, I would also reduce the base grain portion of the grain bill to account for the nominal 20% SG concent.ation that results from boiling......hightest, what do you say?

#28
Posted 13 April 2009 - 03:18 PM
My bad, I didn't re-read the recipe. I was just going off of what you had posted.I was only converting HT's recipe over to all grain, I didn't make up/alter those specialty grains. I've never brewed this so I can't comment.
#29
Posted 17 April 2009 - 12:18 PM
#30
Posted 17 April 2009 - 12:39 PM
71B is used for the primary fermentation, and the Champagne yeast for bottle carbonation (if desired)...Hopefully this isnt a stupid question. The recipe lists both 71B yeast along with champagne yeast being optional. Does that mean its optional to use both 71B and champagne yeast? Or is it optional to use champagne yeast in place of the 71B?

#31
Posted 12 May 2009 - 05:33 AM
#32
Posted 12 May 2009 - 02:27 PM
The closest substitute would be a Crystal 120-140°L malt.... I was wondering , Instead of the special B, could i substitute cyrstal 20-60- or 80 which i have large amounts on hand?
#33
Posted 13 May 2009 - 06:33 PM
#34
Posted 14 May 2009 - 05:07 PM
I'm in. Do the Denver/Springs area members want to do a get together brew at someone's (Odacrem?
) house, or just do it on our own?
The surprise wouldve worked... I didnt read this thread until just now.I ran out of reading material in the other forums and I still got 1/2 hr left to "work".But the important part is do we let him know first before we all go crash his house with a pile of brewing gear?
#35
Posted 28 May 2009 - 12:41 PM
Busted.Sorry everybody I have been meaning to get the group brew start thread posted but between a vacation (yea I know you all feel bad for me) and getting caught up now that I'm back I've been behind. I will post the getting started and process thread today and we can move start and process over there.Thanks for the kick in the pants GuestIn the fermenter last night.S.G.: 1.106 correctedThis morning, it is bubbling away.Discrepancy: All the thermometers in my house that go above 110*F are broken.
I think the steeping water was ~170*F, but it might have been hotter.

#36
Posted 28 May 2009 - 02:24 PM
Well at least you were able to get started. I'm so far behind with stuff at home I will probably have to bow out of the group brew -- although I will get this batch going sometime in the next few weeks, I'll be a lot later than everyone else. Darned work is getting in the way of meadmaking again!!Busted.Sorry everybody I have been meaning to get the group brew start thread posted but between a vacation (yea I know you all feel bad for me) and getting caught up now that I'm back I've been behind. I will post the getting started and process thread today and we can move start and process over there.Thanks for the kick in the pants Guest

#37
Posted 01 June 2009 - 08:22 PM
#38
Posted 02 June 2009 - 04:44 AM
why do we have two threads on this anyhow?Once you have made your mead please do all discussion in this thread. I moved a couple posts pertaining to progress so if you don't see your post check over in the process thread. Thanks!
#39
Posted 02 June 2009 - 05:41 AM
The first thread was the planning/question thread and the new one is the process now that everybody is moving. Just keeping a logical separation between planning, questions, and progress that's all.If it's confusing I could lock this thread.why do we have two threads on this anyhow?
#40
Posted 02 June 2009 - 09:29 AM
That's how I used to handle the issue on "the other board". It's really, much simpler that way......If it's confusing I could lock this thread.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users