Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

maibock


  • Please log in to reply
79 replies to this topic

#61 cavman

cavman

    Comptroller of BigPossMan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12937 posts
  • LocationSomerville, MA

Posted 10 November 2010 - 12:50 PM

I can do 5 including clean up but that's with mrs. zym helping a little bit with clean up. The main area where I lose time is heating my strike water and then putting it in the cooler and waiting for it to stabilize so I can toss the grain in and hit my mash temp.

I mill my grain into my tun then add strike water after, I just heat the strike water accordingly and stir well.

#62 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 10 November 2010 - 01:47 PM

I mill my grain into my tun then add strike water after, I just heat the strike water accordingly and stir well.

I like to let the strike water stabilize in the tun which means I have to overshoot on heating my stike water so that the tun can absorb some of the heat. This seems to lead to very predictable mash temps for me although it takes a little more time to get the mash started.

#63 MtnBrewer

MtnBrewer

    Skynet Architect

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6695 posts
  • LocationThe Springs

Posted 10 November 2010 - 02:12 PM

so the mashing low and long (that's what she said) thread got me thinking. should I maybe mash a little lower for this or is the lack of crystal and/or carapils mean I should indeed keep my mash temps up a little higher?

I would definitely mash a little higher. I'd aim for 155 but as low as 153 is probably ok.

#64 Malzig

Malzig

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 257 posts
  • LocationBOS

Posted 11 November 2010 - 06:04 AM

Traditionally, a Maibock was probably made with a 55-65-75 schedule, I assume, so it was probably mostly mashed around 149F. I'd probably go with 149F for 30-40 minutes and 155-158F for the remainder. That would be my best chance of getting a reasonably dry finish with a little residual body and might give me a chance of coming close to the 3.5-4 Plato FG I'd hope for.

#65 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 06:08 AM

Traditionally, a Maibock was probably made with a 55-65-75 schedule, I assume, so it was probably mostly mashed around 149F. I'd probably go with 149F for 30-40 minutes and 155-158F for the remainder. That would be my best chance of getting a reasonably dry finish with a little residual body and might give me a chance of coming close to the 3.5-4 Plato FG I'd hope for.

I think the only reasonable way I could accomplish this would be a decoction since I'm mashing in a cooler.

#66 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 06:14 AM

I think the only reasonable way I could accomplish this would be a decoction since I'm mashing in a cooler.

just to be clear - I guess I would still consider doing a decoction simply as a means to do a step mash. I would probably just get the pulled grains up to boiling and not hold it for long and throw them back in. Does that sound reasonable?

#67 davelew

davelew

    Comptroller of ACMSO That Are Not Beans

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 19204 posts
  • LocationReading, Massachusetts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 07:45 AM

I think the only reasonable way I could accomplish this would be a decoction since I'm mashing in a cooler.

I've done that style of three-step mash using infusions in a Gott cooler (see post #23 in this thread for the details).

#68 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 07:49 AM

I've done that style of three-step mash using infusions in a Gott cooler (see post #23 in this thread for the details).

wouldn't this cause a difficulting in calcuating the mash chemistry stuff?

#69 davelew

davelew

    Comptroller of ACMSO That Are Not Beans

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 19204 posts
  • LocationReading, Massachusetts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 08:03 AM

wouldn't this cause a difficulting in calcuating the mash chemistry stuff?

No. Mash chemistry is REALLY forgiving, as long as you have the right final concentrations of ions in the beer. Just add the same amount of salts that you would normally add (for a maibock, I would just add a 1/2 teaspoon of gypsum to typical New England soft water) at the beginning, and everything will even out in the end.

#70 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 09:11 AM

No. Mash chemistry is REALLY forgiving, as long as you have the right final concentrations of ions in the beer. Just add the same amount of salts that you would normally add (for a maibock, I would just add a 1/2 teaspoon of gypsum to typical New England soft water) at the beginning, and everything will even out in the end.

I'll have to check but I think palmer's spreadsheet relies on the water/grain ratio when doing the calcuations. Which ratio do I use? The first, second, or third?

#71 davelew

davelew

    Comptroller of ACMSO That Are Not Beans

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 19204 posts
  • LocationReading, Massachusetts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 09:24 AM

I'll have to check but I think palmer's spreadsheet relies on the water/grain ratio when doing the calcuations. Which ratio do I use? The first, second, or third?

I would use the second ratio for mash chemistry, but the final post-boil volume for things like carbonate and sulfate concentrations.

#72 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 09:27 AM

I would use the second ratio for mash chemistry, but the final post-boil volume for things like carbonate and sulfate concentrations.

yeah - I never fully got that. why does the palmer spreadsheet talk about those ratios (carbonate and sulfate) when you are talking about the mash? shouldn't you be calculating those for the final volume? or maybe he is? Maybe I should trace through his excel equations and check...

#73 MtnBrewer

MtnBrewer

    Skynet Architect

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6695 posts
  • LocationThe Springs

Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:02 AM

I'm wondering why you're trying to get a dry finish.

#74 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:26 AM

I'm wondering why you're trying to get a dry finish.

not really dry but I'd like to keep it around 1.015 or so for the FG. I'm just guessing that I might have a hard time with a lager yeast and a beer of this OG with getting the FG down. Maybe I'm being paranoid though.

#75 MtnBrewer

MtnBrewer

    Skynet Architect

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6695 posts
  • LocationThe Springs

Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:38 AM

not really dry but I'd like to keep it around 1.015 or so for the FG. I'm just guessing that I might have a hard time with a lager yeast and a beer of this OG with getting the FG down. Maybe I'm being paranoid though.

Lager yeasts tend to finish dryer to begin with because they can ferment malto-triose and most ale yeasts can't.

#76 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:39 AM

Lager yeasts tend to finish dryer to begin with because they can ferment malto-triose and most ale yeasts can't.

why do we have to pitch so much more yeast for lagers then? Are you comparing lager yeast at lager yeast temps with ale yeast at ale yeast temps?

#77 MtnBrewer

MtnBrewer

    Skynet Architect

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6695 posts
  • LocationThe Springs

Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:41 AM

why do we have to pitch so much more yeast for lagers then? Are you comparing lager yeast at lager yeast temps with ale yeast at ale yeast temps?

Because lager yeast will not propagate as much at lager temps. Yes.

#78 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:44 AM

Because lager yeast will not propagate as much at lager temps. Yes.

so it ferments well but doesn't propagate well (all at lager yeast temps) - got it! :devil:

#79 MtnBrewer

MtnBrewer

    Skynet Architect

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6695 posts
  • LocationThe Springs

Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:48 AM

Yup. To be more accurate, no yeast really propagates well at cold temps.

#80 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 04 March 2011 - 12:39 PM

tried this beer at mr. mangrove's house - very nice stuff. smooth as hell and will probably get better with some age.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users