anybody know the history of brewers yeast?
#21
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:14 AM
#22
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:17 AM
If you have a lot of time on your hands... I've got to think that taking a wild strain and cultivating it into something that would be drinkable will take a long time. We had a discussion about a month or so ago about leaving hydro samples out and the spontaneous fermentation that takes place.well, i do know why this intrigues me so much. i think it would be interesting to get something as close to the original wild yeast as possible and tinker with it.
#23
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:19 AM
i thought back in the day that they didn't know what yeast was, so there was no bakers yeast or brewers yeast. i thought it was simply airborne spores that caused their baked goods to rise.I think originally it was bakers yeast first and then someone figured out you could make some totally awesome barely porridge out of it and get a little bit tipsy
#24
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:20 AM
#25
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:25 AM
#26
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:39 AM
they didn't - but they were making the proto-beer in the same room as the bread and using some of the bread to inoculate it (I think - don't hold me to that).maybe this will help: wiki wikii thought back in the day that they didn't know what yeast was, so there was no bakers yeast or brewers yeast. i thought it was simply airborne spores that caused their baked goods to rise.
#27
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:41 AM
if it was truly an undrinkable wild straing that was the origin, i would agree. but, i'm thinking the natural strain is drinkable, at least to some degree. i don't know if it's something i would ever really experiment with a whole heck of a lot because you are probably right that it would take waaaaayyy too long to actually cultivate it into something worth brewing. but, it would be interesting to try to create at least a small batch of something as close to the original as possible.I've got to think that taking a wild strain and cultivating it into something that would be drinkable will take a long time.
#28
Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:56 AM
I followed it up with an actual answer though. My bad for making a funny.Cheers,RichThe question definitely is a brewing question, but some of the postings are off course and not relevant to brewing.
#29
Posted 26 May 2010 - 11:00 AM
#30
Posted 26 May 2010 - 11:02 AM
lol...huh?There was a guy that brewed with some ANCIENT yeast he cultivated from a bug in some amber. I think that is going back a bit further that you wanted though.Cheers,Rich
#32
Posted 26 May 2010 - 11:17 AM
oh yeah, i've heard about that. that's hardcore.Yeastie pooCheers,Rich
#33
Posted 26 May 2010 - 12:29 PM
I don't think there's any cultivating to it. You find the wild strain, isolate it and then it either does something that you like or it doesn't.I've got to think that taking a wild strain and cultivating it into something that would be drinkable will take a long time.
#34
Posted 26 May 2010 - 12:35 PM
Maybe its more of a "isolating a strain that isn't offensive to the palate". Now that could take some time.I don't think there's any cultivating to it. You find the wild strain, isolate it and then it either does something that you like or it doesn't.
#35
Posted 26 May 2010 - 12:49 PM
#36
Posted 26 May 2010 - 01:13 PM
#37
Posted 26 May 2010 - 01:28 PM
AFAIK, it was beer yeast first and then bakers started getting their yeast from breweries.they didn't - but they were making the proto-beer in the same room as the bread and using some of the bread to inoculate it (I think - don't hold me to that).maybe this will help: wiki wiki
#38
Posted 26 May 2010 - 01:32 PM
It could take a number of attempts or you could get a good one the first time. It's trial and error.Maybe its more of a "isolating a strain that isn't offensive to the palate". Now that could take some time.
#40
Posted 26 May 2010 - 06:32 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users