Why isn't Eisbock beer?
#1
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:09 PM
#2
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:15 PM
i say beer.We are having a lively debate within our local homebrew club. One member is saying that he doesn't consider Eisbeer beer. I'm saying that it is beer.What say ye?
#3
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:20 PM
#4
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:21 PM
it's not illegal b/c it's not really distilling is my understanding of it.I've seen these conversations before and I have heard of some people saying that they would be afraid to enter an Eisbock into a comp for fear they would be arrested for distilling. I'm not sure I even understand the process. Supposedly, the style was discovered when ice chunks were fished out of partially frozen barrels of beer. What is the process (distilling?) that would make it illegal and possible not beer? I vote beer.
#5
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:30 PM
Which is exactly how I understand it. When you distill something you are removing the alcohol from the wash/mash/etc (As the alcohol vapors condense and collect). You don't remove alcohol when you make Eisbeer, you remove frozen water.I think I'm remembering this right.it's not illegal b/c it's not really distilling is my understanding of it.
#6
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:33 PM
#7
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:43 PM
truth!the idea that this is distillation is reinforced by the term I have heard several times of freeze distillation. I believe it is actually known as fractional freezing, is definitely not distillation or illegal and MUST be beer. I say must because if not then any of the many beer sold here at least with the word "ice" in the title would also not be beer.like this one: Though you might also say that the above is not "beer" for other reasons.....Whether it's considered distillation or not under US law is irrelevant. It's still beer.
#8
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:48 PM
#9
Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:57 PM
#10
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:32 PM
#11
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:35 PM
+1I also voted beer. It is simply beer with some of the water removed via freezing rather than boiling.it's not illegal b/c it's not really distilling is my understanding of it.
#12
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:36 PM
#13
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:43 PM
#14
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:54 PM
This poll needs a "sans coulottes" option.I would be more inclined to say I am 50/50 on the matter.
#15
Posted 04 March 2010 - 06:13 PM
I suppose I used to know this but forgot until poking around a little.. jackingill stir up the waters. If i understand correctly there are some countries which do not consider it beer, while others (US included) do. So, i would be more inclined to say I am 50/50 on the matter. Me personally, I would rather use more of any source of sugar then find a work around to jack up the abv of my beverage....plus all grain makes better tasting beer! haha
#16
Posted 04 March 2010 - 06:20 PM
#17
Posted 04 March 2010 - 06:20 PM
#18
Posted 04 March 2010 - 06:20 PM
If a mod can edit the poll and add the option, its fine with me.This poll needs a "sans coulottes" option.
I'm interested in both sides of this. If you voted no, I'd be interested to know why you feel that way.If you voted yes, I want to know why you feel that way as well.Oh, 2 people voted NO. Who ruined the fun?
Edited by HarvInCoMo, 04 March 2010 - 06:24 PM.
#19
Posted 04 March 2010 - 06:21 PM
#20
Posted 04 March 2010 - 06:24 PM
Good luckBAM!*searches for pool*
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users