mmmmmmmmmmyes it isAn all Munich IPA, heavily hopped with American hops, is a wonderful thing.

Munich Malt
#21
Posted 22 April 2009 - 09:55 AM
#22
Posted 22 April 2009 - 10:37 AM
Huh.An all Munich IPA, heavily hopped with American hops, is a wonderful thing.

Edited by hullabrew, 22 April 2009 - 10:38 AM.
#23
Posted 22 April 2009 - 11:26 AM
#24
Posted 22 April 2009 - 11:30 AM
Absofreakinlutely all Munich grist! About 1.075 OG, 75-80 IBU.Huh.
Literally all Munich for the malt?I use 6% Munich in my house IPA. Very tasty!edit: what OG and IBU?
#25
Posted 22 April 2009 - 11:34 AM
My last IPA was 50/50 MO and Munich - really rich malt flavor. A bit on the toasty side. I dig the Munich in IPAs. I didn't add any to the barley wine I just did though, I'll have to try that on the next one.Absofreakinlutely all Munich grist! About 1.075 OG, 75-80 IBU.
#26
Posted 22 April 2009 - 11:35 AM
damn a nice big ol chunk of malt, whatcha think Chinook? Centennial?Absofreakinlutely all Munich grist! About 1.075 OG, 75-80 IBU.
#27
Posted 22 April 2009 - 11:37 AM

#28
Posted 22 April 2009 - 12:15 PM
I think both of those would be great. The high cohumulone Chinook would be great for bittering to cut through the maltiness. Maybe Centennial at 20, more Chinook at 5, then DH with Centennial.damn a nice big ol chunk of malt, whatcha think Chinook? Centennial?
#29
Posted 22 April 2009 - 12:18 PM
that was my thinking on the high cohumulene hops as well, damn now I gotta but more maltI think both of those would be great. The high cohumulone Chinook would be great for bittering to cut through the maltiness. Maybe Centennial at 20, more Chinook at 5, then DH with Centennial.

#30
Posted 22 April 2009 - 12:30 PM
What color Munich?Absofreakinlutely all Munich grist! About 1.075 OG, 75-80 IBU.
#31
Posted 22 April 2009 - 01:00 PM
10L/20EBCWhat color Munich?
#32
Posted 22 April 2009 - 03:13 PM
In my experience, you are correct. However, Briess does make a very nice 2-row Munich called Bonlander (?). I've used this a number of times with great success and it seems much closer to the continental varieties than their 6-row stuff.However, I've also used the Briess 6-row munich as the only malt in a highly hopped IPA and was quite pleased with the results, so YMMV...Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think many of the domestic Munich malts are made from 6-row.
#33
Posted 23 April 2009 - 10:16 AM
I know the regular Briess is, but their Bonkander is not. GW is 2 row, and FWIW, I like it a lot and use it frequently.Of the ones I've tried, I'm partial to Durst or Weyermann, and have not been at all happy with Briess or Great Western. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think many of the domestic Munich malts are made from 6-row.
#34
Posted 23 April 2009 - 01:47 PM
#35
Posted 23 April 2009 - 01:49 PM
I'm working my way through a sack of the Gambrinus ESB malt and have been pretty happy with it (especially for the price).+1 on the Gambrinus Munich , tasty stuff.Drew have you tried the ESB Pale malt? I really am digging it.
#36
Posted 23 April 2009 - 02:41 PM
I've used it a lot in alts that were 75-100% GW Munich and I really liked it. Even won some awards for those beers. I've been using Durst Munich for the last year since that was what I had on hand, but I'll go back to GW when the Durst is gone.But in a grain bill with lots of munich in a very malty beer (Dunkel, O'Fest, DBock) it just isn't as nice as the continental varieties IMO.
#37
Posted 23 April 2009 - 03:15 PM
#38
Posted 23 April 2009 - 03:18 PM
And that's the beauty of making beer, it's totally subjective..... some people love peat smoked malt, I think it tastes like licking a fireplace. I've been using the Durst Munich I got through the club order, and it's the nicest Munich I've used. Do you prefer the GW or is it based on price?I've used it a lot in alts that were 75-100% GW Munich and I really liked it. Even won some awards for those beers. I've been using Durst Munich for the last year since that was what I had on hand, but I'll go back to GW when the Durst is gone.
#39
Posted 23 April 2009 - 03:27 PM
Yep, that's the Durst I've been using, too. And while I do really like it a lot, I'm willing to be heretical and say that I think GW has more flavor than the Durst. I'll probably come to regret typing that. Especially because it's _your_ beers that keep on winning!And that's the beauty of making beer, it's totally subjective..... some people love peat smoked malt, I think it tastes like licking a fireplace. I've been using the Durst Munich I got through the club order, and it's the nicest Munich I've used. Do you prefer the GW or is it based on price?

#40
Posted 24 April 2009 - 11:40 AM
Yeah, that's just because you haven't been entering yours! I'll have to objectively give the GW another try since my bag of Durst is about gone.Yep, that's the Durst I've been using, too. And while I do really like it a lot, I'm willing to be heretical and say that I think GW has more flavor than the Durst. I'll probably come to regret typing that. Especially because it's _your_ beers that keep on winning!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users