Goose Island Urban Pale Ale...
#1
Posted 25 March 2014 - 02:44 PM
#2
Posted 25 March 2014 - 07:13 PM
#3
Posted 25 March 2014 - 07:21 PM
The 312 Urban Wheat is popular so my guess was that they wanted to create a "312 line" of beers. Are you peeved because they used the same name as the wheat? What is funny is that earlier this month I envisioned a nice SPRING & SUMMER PALE ALE that was bittered with Magnum and finished up with some Amarillo. Not this beer, clearly but still very much in the spirit of this beer. Something refreshing but still interesting for warmer weather.The name pisses me off so much. Honestly it just sets them up for confusion . Super solid beer though, I can honestly see myself buying this all summer long and at least for me a solid contender for SNPA
#4
Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:53 AM
I dont see 312 as a line of beers just a beer. Its really synonymous with Chicago and the most accepted craft beer by beer luddites. People as for 312 and they know they will get that wheat pale ale. Naming wise they had so much more to choose from if they went the area code route
773 (the largest damn area code in the city)
630
yet they chose to possibly confuse their consumer. Granted now it will be "can I get a green/yellow 312" which just makes it sound ugly.
#5
Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:17 AM
I was up in Wrigleyville last July and I asked a bartender for a 3,1,2 and the guy next to me chuckled. I guess I should have asked for a 312. I gave the guy slack b/c after all, he's a fine mid westerner
#6
Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:18 AM
Right now, in my mind, I'm trying to pair a Portillo's beef with a beer hmmm.......
I need a beef something awful.
#7
Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:24 AM
I'm pretty sure that is the same beer that used to be called "Green Line" and was draft only. It seemed designed to take away tap handles from SNPA. It's a nice sessionable beer, like a SNPA's little brother. As for the naming, my guess is the marketing guys at inbev would rather deal with brand confusion than paying for brand awareness.
#8
Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:38 AM
Green line is different. I was at a bar over the weekend and they had Green Line (which I drank) but they didn't have the 312 Pale Ale. I think the 312 Urban Pale Ale is better... totally different beer and there are two separate pages on the GI website for the beers.Brother Poptop: Mmm, yes the Portillos beef. Yum.I'm pretty sure that is the same beer that used to be called "Green Line" and was draft only. It seemed designed to take away tap handles from SNPA. It's a nice sessionable beer, like a SNPA's little brother. As for the naming, my guess is the marketing guys at inbev would rather deal with brand confusion than paying for brand awareness.
#9
Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:07 AM
I'm pretty sure that is the same beer that used to be called "Green Line" and was draft only. It seemed designed to take away tap handles from SNPA. It's a nice sessionable beer, like a SNPA's little brother. As for the naming, my guess is the marketing guys at inbev would rather deal with brand confusion than paying for brand awareness.
I asked at the brewery on Clybourn and they said it's a completely different beer. I really do wish they had Greenline in bottles.
#10
Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:51 AM
Green line is different. I was at a bar over the weekend and they had Green Line (which I drank) but they didn't have the 312 Pale Ale. I think the 312 Urban Pale Ale is better... totally different beer and there are two separate pages on the GI website for the beers.Brother Poptop: Mmm, yes the Portillos beef. Yum.
I asked at the brewery on Clybourn and they said it's a completely different beer. I really do wish they had Greenline in bottles.
Cool. I'll have to give it a try then.
#11
Posted 26 March 2014 - 10:28 AM
#12
Posted 26 March 2014 - 10:33 AM
Chicago needs a green and gold beer!
Whoa there young man!
#13
Posted 26 March 2014 - 11:25 AM
My guess is that anyone ordering a "312" expecting the wheat beer will be asked by their server if they want the wheat or the pale ale... which could cause confusion... and then the server would hopefully say that the pale ale is new or the wheat beer is the original or whatever. They look totally different so hopefully no confusion. I will say though, this is a very nice beer. Crisp, refreshing, clean and not in your face. Very nice effort....they chose to possibly confuse their consumer. Granted now it will be "can I get a green/yellow 312" which just makes it sound ugly.
#14
Posted 26 March 2014 - 12:30 PM
Edited by KenLenard, 26 March 2014 - 12:32 PM.
#15
Posted 28 March 2014 - 05:37 PM
#16
Posted 28 March 2014 - 06:18 PM
Carlos: It's a tough call but do you think that the beer has an American ale yeast or something English/British? When I use an English strain... I have a trick: Stick you finger in your glass of beer and then rub it in the back of your hand. The aroma is very bready and almost crackery, like a Saltine. I need to do that with the 312 Pale Ale but tonight I'm drinking MLPA! Cheers.Bought another 12, damn good session beer. Let me know how it turns out Ken.
#17
Posted 28 March 2014 - 08:42 PM
#18
Posted 29 March 2014 - 05:46 AM
#19
Posted 29 March 2014 - 01:29 PM
#20
Posted 29 March 2014 - 01:43 PM
It's very possible. Goose Island is about the English stuff and they call Honker's Ale a "bitter" although it's made with a lot of American ingredients. Their website says the grain bill is "2 row and C60" so they're really not telling you. I could see 50% of the base malt being English with no trouble. May have to go get some 1968 and try to make this beer with that instead... it would be clear, that's fo sho.Maybe a bit of MO in there? Blend it with the two row maybe.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users