Critique my thinking here
#1
Posted 12 July 2009 - 08:59 AM
#2
Posted 12 July 2009 - 09:23 AM
#3
Posted 12 July 2009 - 09:31 AM
#4
Posted 12 July 2009 - 09:42 AM
#5
Posted 12 July 2009 - 09:53 AM
#6
Posted 12 July 2009 - 05:55 PM
#7
Posted 12 July 2009 - 06:32 PM
The malt is plenty modified. It doesn't need a protein rest. If you want to do an authentic Pilsner mash schedule you would do a beta and alpha amylase rest followed by a 78*C mash-out but this is unnecessary IMO. Cooling the wort to primary temp before pitching is crucial. +1!I would probably due a short protein rest 10-30 mins depending on how well modified the malt is.I would do a 90 min boil as suggested.I would cool to primary temp before pitching the yeast.
+1. This is important for getting that Imported Lager flavor but be careful. Leaving the carboy out on a sunny day, you can get the desired flavor in less than 2 minutes.Make sure you stick your carboy in the sun to get that classic imported taste.
#8
Posted 13 July 2009 - 03:01 AM
Hmmm.... is it the same if I get really drunk and then play hide and go seek with a skunk?The malt is plenty modified. It doesn't need a protein rest. If you want to do an authentic Pilsner mash schedule you would do a beta and alpha amylase rest followed by a 78*C mash-out but this is unnecessary IMO. Cooling the wort to primary temp before pitching is crucial. +1!+1. This is important for getting that Imported Lager flavor but be careful. Leaving the carboy out on a sunny day, you can get the desired flavor in less than 2 minutes.
#9
Posted 13 July 2009 - 05:58 AM
#10
Posted 13 July 2009 - 07:29 AM
Check this out for some more tips: https://thebrewingne...l-Show-04-23-07Wanted to try to make a Pilsner type beer... shooting for Pilsner Urquell, would gladly settle for Stella or Heineken-like results.Make a huge starter of yeast, probably White Labs European Lager, double what I usually use for ales. Yes, check a pitching rate calculator to get your desired pitch rate.Put together a grain bill of something like 9 pounds absolute best pilsner malt I can find, Belgian if available, and then a pound of the lightest vienna malt they have. Sounds good to me.Mashing: Shoot for 150 or so for the main sachriffication rest... but is it crucial to do a protein rest for this style? No protein rest necessary, usually.Boil: One hour, add hallertauer at 60, tettnanger and saaz at 10. Boil 90 minutes, I'd go all Saaz.Cool down as fast as possible. Very important to get below 140°F ASAP, halts DMS production.Cold pitch lager yeast into wort, and then get it chilling as fast as possible. If you can, bring the wort down below the pitch temp by a few degrees before pitching. Like ken said, oxygenate.Wait wait wait wait wait.When it's fermented dry, pull it out and let it sit at room temp for a week so the yeasties can eat their diacytal up. Diacetyl rest may or may not be necessary. As the primary ferment is coming to an end, take a gravity sample, smell and taste it. If you can't pick up any diacetyl, you don't need to do the rest.Put it into secondary.Keg.Drink and post idiotically. How will we know the difference from your normal posts?
Edited by JKoravos, 13 July 2009 - 07:32 AM.
#11
Posted 13 July 2009 - 08:09 AM
I think this is close to the same recipe that they had in the magazine just over a year ago. My buddy and I bought a pound of saaz off E-Bay and made 10 gallons... came out pretty good despite the manifold falling apart during the mash. We risked some HSA and had to take everything out of the tun to put the manifold back (it's been lightly cemented together since then). We did a single infusion, and it came out just fine. IIRC, we were a bit higher than 150, so probably came out a bit sweeter than it should have.FWIW BYOs 150 clones issue has Pilsner Urquell's clone as:8# pilsner1# vienna.5# munich.5# carapils1.3 oz cluster 60.93 oz saaz 15.75 oz saaz 0Wyeast 2001 (Urquell Lager) or white labs WLP800 (pilsner)They are calling for a 15 minute rest at 132, then a decoction to 155 for 45 minutes. I still think a single infusion at 150 is fine unless you do decoctions regularly.
#12
Posted 13 July 2009 - 08:18 AM
First, I'm not a fan of diacetyl rests. I think they're mostly a way for commercial breweries to get beer out of their fermenters more quickly. If you treat your yeast well and let it ferment a long time, you won;t have problems with diacetyl. On the other hand, if you do a diacetyl rest too early, you'll get fruity off flavors. For most homebrewers, I think it's more likely that a diacetyl rest will cause problems than solve them.Second, if you absolutely must do a diacetyl rest, the yeast need some sugars to consume in order to take care of the diacetyl. If you wait until the beer is fermented dry, the diacetyl rest won't actually take care of any diacetyl. The yeast need to be active and metabolizing order to eliminate diacetyl.When it's fermented dry, pull it out and let it sit at room temp for a week so the yeasties can eat their diacytal up.
#13
Posted 13 July 2009 - 09:25 AM
#14
Posted 13 July 2009 - 09:53 AM
#15
Posted 13 July 2009 - 01:05 PM
You can get fruity ale-like esters from doing the diacetyl rest before fermentation is mostly complete.When I pitch big, aerate well, and ferment cool, I've never gotten a hint of diacetyl in my lagers. I've had problems with ale-like off-flavors from fermenting too warm or too cold, but never diacetyl. Your mileage may vary, but if you do a good long primary and follow good brewineg practices, I don't think diacetyl rests are necessary.How would a diacetyl rest cause problems?
#16
Posted 13 July 2009 - 01:10 PM
It's not just the yeast that produces diacetyl, it's also the composition of the wort. When yeast are missing a certain nutrient, the amino acid valine, they produce 2-acetolactate within the yeast cells as part of the pathway to create valine. The 2-acetolactate then leaks out of the cells, and, in the spaces between the yeast cells, it naturally degrades into 2,3-butanedione over time. The product of this degradation, 2,3-butanedione, is better known by its common name, "diacetyl". When the yeast see the diacetyl in their beery home, they feel threatened by the diacetyl, and start an enzymatic path to transform the diacetyl into an almost tasteless higher alcohol, 2,3-butanediol.The reason for the diacetyl rest is to make sure all of the acetolactate has turned into diacetyl while the yeast is still active enough to do something about it. If you have a valine-deficient wort, you could have acetolactate precursors, and be unable to taste them. During cold storage, it's possible that diacetyl will be slowly created and the yeast wil be unable to get rid of it.In the end, pro brewers tend to do diacetyl rests because it's cheaper than testing for Valine in wort, and good insurance for a large batch. If you don't use a ton of adjuncts, and don't underpitch (forcing the yeast to multiply so many times that they have a high probability of creating metabolic mutants unable to absorb valine), your yeast will have plenty of valine and you won't need to do a diacetyl rest because the yeast will never create diacetyl precursors.I do know that Wyeast 2000 Budvar produces diacetyl
#17
Posted 13 July 2009 - 02:33 PM
I like beer.It's not just the yeast that produces diacetyl, it's also the composition of the wort. When yeast are missing a certain nutrient, the amino acid valine, they produce 2-acetolactate within the yeast cells as part of the pathway to create valine. The 2-acetolactate then leaks out of the cells, and, in the spaces between the yeast cells, it naturally degrades into 2,3-butanedione over time. The product of this degradation, 2,3-butanedione, is better known by its common name, "diacetyl". When the yeast see the diacetyl in their beery home, they feel threatened by the diacetyl, and start an enzymatic path to transform the diacetyl into an almost tasteless higher alcohol, 2,3-butanediol.The reason for the diacetyl rest is to make sure all of the acetolactate has turned into diacetyl while the yeast is still active enough to do something about it. If you have a valine-deficient wort, you could have acetolactate precursors, and be unable to taste them. During cold storage, it's possible that diacetyl will be slowly created and the yeast wil be unable to get rid of it.In the end, pro brewers tend to do diacetyl rests because it's cheaper than testing for Valine in wort, and good insurance for a large batch. If you don't use a ton of adjuncts, and don't underpitch (forcing the yeast to multiply so many times that they have a high probability of creating metabolic mutants unable to absorb valine), your yeast will have plenty of valine and you won't need to do a diacetyl rest because the yeast will never create diacetyl precursors.
#18
Posted 13 July 2009 - 03:11 PM
#19
Posted 13 July 2009 - 03:31 PM
lolI like beer.
#20
Posted 13 July 2009 - 03:55 PM
Is there any way to add Valine?It's not just the yeast that produces diacetyl, it's also the composition of the wort. When yeast are missing a certain nutrient, the amino acid valine, they produce 2-acetolactate within the yeast cells as part of the pathway to create valine. The 2-acetolactate then leaks out of the cells, and, in the spaces between the yeast cells, it naturally degrades into 2,3-butanedione over time. The product of this degradation, 2,3-butanedione, is better known by its common name, "diacetyl". When the yeast see the diacetyl in their beery home, they feel threatened by the diacetyl, and start an enzymatic path to transform the diacetyl into an almost tasteless higher alcohol, 2,3-butanediol.The reason for the diacetyl rest is to make sure all of the acetolactate has turned into diacetyl while the yeast is still active enough to do something about it. If you have a valine-deficient wort, you could have acetolactate precursors, and be unable to taste them. During cold storage, it's possible that diacetyl will be slowly created and the yeast wil be unable to get rid of it.In the end, pro brewers tend to do diacetyl rests because it's cheaper than testing for Valine in wort, and good insurance for a large batch. If you don't use a ton of adjuncts, and don't underpitch (forcing the yeast to multiply so many times that they have a high probability of creating metabolic mutants unable to absorb valine), your yeast will have plenty of valine and you won't need to do a diacetyl rest because the yeast will never create diacetyl precursors.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users