Memory Lapse Pale Ale...
#301
Posted 12 November 2009 - 12:30 PM
#302
Posted 12 November 2009 - 05:42 PM
#303
Posted 21 November 2009 - 02:38 PM
#304
Posted 21 November 2009 - 04:31 PM
#305
Posted 13 December 2009 - 07:21 PM
#306
Posted 31 December 2009 - 10:01 AM
#307
Posted 31 December 2009 - 10:56 AM
US 2-row is less malty. This beer is dangerously on the edge of not having enough hops so if I did this I might mash a little lower and maybe cut back every so slightly on the crystal.Hi all - first time post on this board. I just started homebrewing again after a 3 year sabbatical. I managed to work all of the kinks out of my brewing process last weekend with a 10 gallon batch of CJ's JPA (one of my all time favorites). After smelling all of those hops, I'm ready for more of a house/session beer and this really looks to fit the bill. I did have one question though - and this may just be my poor memory (which should make memory lapse ale really dangerous for me!). What is the difference between American 2-row and British 2-row? Can they be used interchangeably? Also, would this benefit at all from using Marris Otter? I seem to remember falling in love with MO and using that in most of my beers, but I'm not sure if that would upset the balance of this recipe. I would like to brew this as true to recipe as possible before I start experimenting - I just don't remember where the lines of interchangeability are. Thanks! Joe
#308
Posted 31 December 2009 - 01:35 PM
Did you watch my Wheaton Warrenville South Tigers take the Championship?Possibly the clearest (and tastiest!) batch of MLPA I have made to date. Enjoying this batch today (watching some HS football & college, working in the yard too) and probably tomorrow for some NFL. Beautiful fall day today too... about 55° and sunny.
#309
Posted 01 January 2010 - 09:41 PM
#310
Posted 04 January 2010 - 07:02 AM
I agree that English malt could make this beer too malty. If it's all you have, you could charge it with more hops (say 6 to 6.5 AAU), mash lower, etc. But earlier in this thread there were some realizations about the balance of this beer. When it's made right, the balance is good. But a number of issues could throw the balance to the malty side: Underattenuation, mashing too high, older hops that have lost their mojo, undercarbonation, using too many specialty grains, etc. Use 2-row if you can. Rcemech: Glad to hear it's looking good. Please post back when you have tried a bottle that is carbed up. Cheers.Hi all - first time post on this board. I just started homebrewing again after a 3 year sabbatical. I managed to work all of the kinks out of my brewing process last weekend with a 10 gallon batch of CJ's JPA (one of my all time favorites). After smelling all of those hops, I'm ready for more of a house/session beer and this really looks to fit the bill. I did have one question though - and this may just be my poor memory (which should make memory lapse ale really dangerous for me!). What is the difference between American 2-row and British 2-row? Can they be used interchangeably? Also, would this benefit at all from using Marris Otter? I seem to remember falling in love with MO and using that in most of my beers, but I'm not sure if that would upset the balance of this recipe. I would like to brew this as true to recipe as possible before I start experimenting - I just don't remember where the lines of interchangeability are. Thanks! Joe
#311
Posted 04 January 2010 - 07:46 AM
I recently noticed (never really checked before) that my pale ale malt is slightly darker than standard us 2-row. Do you think this would be enough to mess with the recipe too much? I would think just a slightly lower mash temp would easily make up the difference.I agree that English malt could make this beer too malty. If it's all you have, you could charge it with more hops (say 6 to 6.5 AAU), mash lower, etc. But earlier in this thread there were some realizations about the balance of this beer. When it's made right, the balance is good. But a number of issues could throw the balance to the malty side: Underattenuation, mashing too high, older hops that have lost their mojo, undercarbonation, using too many specialty grains, etc. Use 2-row if you can. Rcemech: Glad to hear it's looking good. Please post back when you have tried a bottle that is carbed up. Cheers.
#312
Posted 04 January 2010 - 08:46 AM
It's hard to tell. For the record, I typically get standard domestic 2-row from manufacturers like Briess, Rahr, Great Western, etc. I think these are less malty than almost any other base malt you might find out there. I recently had an English Bitter lined up but ran out of UK Pale Malt so I used domestic 2-row and I notice the difference. The beer is lighter in body and flavor and doesn't have as deep of a base flavor as the Simpson's UK malt I normally use. Could you make MLPA with a maltier base grain and mash lower? I would say YES, but I have never tried it. Cheers Amigo.I recently noticed (never really checked before) that my pale ale malt is slightly darker than standard us 2-row. Do you think this would be enough to mess with the recipe too much? I would think just a slightly lower mash temp would easily make up the difference.
#313
Posted 15 January 2010 - 03:32 PM
I tried another bottle last night and it keeps getting better and better. I did the extract version and it turned out even better than last time which was deemed terrific by some pretty finicky connoisseurs (3rd time brewing MLPA as an extract). I'm gonna try bases loaded blonde on my new AG set up, then its the MLPA AG verison for the first time, and then hopefully a 10 gal batch for charity. Cheers! RichI agree that English malt could make this beer too malty. If it's all you have, you could charge it with more hops (say 6 to 6.5 AAU), mash lower, etc. But earlier in this thread there were some realizations about the balance of this beer. When it's made right, the balance is good. But a number of issues could throw the balance to the malty side: Underattenuation, mashing too high, older hops that have lost their mojo, undercarbonation, using too many specialty grains, etc. Use 2-row if you can. Rcemech: Glad to hear it's looking good. Please post back when you have tried a bottle that is carbed up. Cheers.
#314
Posted 15 January 2010 - 04:22 PM
Whoo hoo! Cheers RCEMECH!I tried another bottle last night and it keeps getting better and better. I did the extract version and it turned out even better than last time which was deemed terrific by some pretty finicky connoisseurs (3rd time brewing MLPA as an extract). I'm gonna try bases loaded blonde on my new AG set up, then its the MLPA AG verison for the first time, and then hopefully a 10 gal batch for charity. Cheers! Rich
#315
Posted 17 January 2010 - 01:31 AM
#317
Posted 17 January 2010 - 04:17 PM
Geez, ET... where have you been? Did you fire up your own brewpub or something? Haven't seen you on here in a looooooong time, Amigo. Hope all is well.check page 1 there daddy-o, as far as I know nothing has changed in 16 pages.
The recipe is the same, unless you want to modify it. If you need an extract recipe (and there hasn't been one posted... I can't remember now), just ask and I'll post it. Cheers.I want to brew this beer next weekend.What's the current recipe?
#318
Posted 17 January 2010 - 05:54 PM
#319
Posted 17 January 2010 - 07:04 PM
#320
Posted 18 January 2010 - 10:00 AM
It's in the mash at 151 right now! I'll let you know how it goes....On the one hand, the Munich will make it maltier, but OTOH, the 7.5 AAUs plus the late addition should be more than enough to make up for it. Sounds very tasty, IMO. Hey Chad... save me a bottle of that, will you?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users