Wyeast 1007
#1
Posted 19 October 2010 - 06:25 PM
#2
Posted 19 October 2010 - 06:27 PM
#3
Posted 19 October 2010 - 06:28 PM
#4
Posted 20 October 2010 - 05:49 AM
#5
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:04 AM
#6
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:21 AM
#7
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:34 AM
Only reason I wont do this is because of the top cropping characteristics. Love the yeast, I just need more head space. Even with Fermcap.Right now if I was to choose a house yeast, I'd pick Pacman.1007 has pretty much become my house ale yeast anymore
#8
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:36 AM
They just need to make pacman a regular release, I missed the boat last time it came out.Only reason I wont do this is because of the top cropping characteristics. Love the yeast, I just need more head space. Even with Fermcap.Right now if I was to choose a house yeast, I'd pick Pacman.
#9
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:39 AM
Ive got my last pak propping as we speak. Hoping it comes back this spring.They just need to make pacman a regular release, I missed the boat last time it came out.
#10
Posted 20 October 2010 - 07:13 AM
#11
Posted 20 October 2010 - 08:23 AM
They just need to make pacman a regular release, I missed the boat last time it came out.
You can cultivate it from bottles of Rogue. I managed to get it going from the sediment in their Yellow Snow IPA. Made several batches from that one.Ive got my last pak propping as we speak. Hoping it comes back this spring.
#12
Posted 20 October 2010 - 08:27 AM
I've cultured from bottles before and while it works, it's not ideal if you plan to use the same yeast for several batches. I'd rather have a smacker and split it for a couple different batches.You can cultivate it from bottles of Rogue. I managed to get it going from the sediment in their Yellow Snow IPA. Made several batches from that one.
#13
Posted 20 October 2010 - 08:58 AM
#14
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:32 PM
Wyeast 1450 Denny's Favorite 50 is a year round yeast now. Excellent yeast, CL50.PacMan on the other hand is not, so you have to know someone. Also an excellent yeast which was used in a Berliner Weiss that I brewed. For that matter, PacMan produced some of my base beers that were then inoculated with bugs. B)There was talk a few months ago that PacMan might go full time but haven't seen it available for commercial sales.Id like to try Denny's sometime too.
#15
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:43 PM
I tried Pacman for several batches. I really didn't see much difference from 1056. It's been a while but maybe more attenuation and active fermentation. What did you all like about it that I missed? Just wondering............There was talk a few months ago that PacMan might go full time but haven't seen it available for commercial sales.
#16
Posted 20 October 2010 - 07:50 PM
As far as being neutral, attenuation, and cold there is not much difference. As far as floccing and producing brilliant clear beers with ease. Pacman wins hands down.I tried Pacman for several batches. I really didn't see much difference from 1056. It's been a while but maybe more attenuation and active fermentation. What did you all like about it that I missed? Just wondering.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users