The 70% number is all over the place...MB Raines mentions using 70%: https://www.maltosef...t_Culturing.phpIn First Steps in Yeast Culture Rajotte says, " It has its maximum effect when mixed with water at a concentration of 70% by weight (77% per volume). In some areas it is possible to purchase drinking alcohol at a concentration of 90%. However, alcohol at this concentration has a lower germicidal effect than at a 70% concentrations. Drinking alcohol such as gin or vodka is sold at concentrations of 40%. ALthough good, it is not as effective as 70%."As far as alcohol having to be 70% to be effective, I'd be interested in seeing some more info. I don't use it a a primary sterilizer, hence the star-san. But I do use it for such items as wiping off a yeast pouch before I tear it open.

Star San foam
#21
Posted 28 March 2009 - 03:53 PM
#22
Posted 28 March 2009 - 04:06 PM
#23
*_Guest_Blktre_*
Posted 28 March 2009 - 04:07 PM
Saniclean requires double the mix vs Starsan......So, more money. Saniclean is more expensive. But you got a good deal there for sure.Sounds like you need to shop somewhere else. Here we get 1 gallon Star-San for $42.50/gallon. 1 gallon of Sani-Clean is $38.50. So at least here in St. Louis it is the opposite. I'm sure Drew could bring some back the next time to KC.
#24
Posted 28 March 2009 - 04:09 PM
Sanitizers work by bursting the cell walls. So, probably something to do with needing water to get cell permeability. Anyway... I think alcohol is a decent surface sanitizer. I know breweries use it to spray down stuff, probably because it's convenient. They can just buy a bottle of it put a sprayer on it and it's good forever. That's obviously not their sanitizer, however. I have a bottle around, but mostly use it to spray down flasks and flame them for starters.The 70% number is all over the place...
#25
Posted 28 March 2009 - 04:19 PM
That I did not know.Saniclean requires double the mix vs Starsan......So, more money. Saniclean is more expensive. But you got a good deal there for sure.

#26
*_Guest_Blktre_*
Posted 28 March 2009 - 04:27 PM
I think Saniclean has its place. Like keg washers that seem to be the thing to build in my club. Saniclean works better in this situation. Another situation is when folks pump sanitizer through their entire system. Some of the folks don't like the foam from the pumping. The foam doesn't bother me none. As others noted, when filling fermenters, the foam gets chased out from the wort anyways.That I did not know.
That just put Sani-clean on my do not purchase list. Thanks for the info!
#27
Posted 28 March 2009 - 07:16 PM
Define "most."
And less than "all"Its greater than some.
#28
Posted 28 March 2009 - 08:37 PM
I'd say the liquid fraction foam comprises of way less than 3%. It's more likely .3% or .03%.I look at it this way.I put 1 ounce of StarSan in 5 gallons, or 640 ounces.1/640 = 0.156% (less than 1 %). So at "full strength", your StarSan solution is 99.844% water and 0.156% StarSan.When you pour it out of the craboy, or bucket, you get almost all the 5 gallons of back. The StarSan left behind is in the form of foam, that foam is what? I will guess 97% air and 3% solution. Now you have 3% or your 0.156% left in your bucket.When you rack on top of the foam and push the foam out, you get rid of what? I guess 50% of the foam. So 50% of 3% of 0.156% = 0.00234%.Obviously my numbers are speculation and guesses. But the idea is valid. Of that foam left behind in your carboy, there ain't much left of your 1 ounce of StarSan.It looks intimidating. I would speculate that your malt contributes much more phosphoric and other chemical stuff to your beer than the residual StarSan does.zymot
#29
Posted 28 March 2009 - 08:45 PM

#30
Posted 28 March 2009 - 09:06 PM

#31
Posted 28 March 2009 - 10:39 PM
#32
Posted 28 March 2009 - 11:13 PM
Yea, But seriously it's like parts per million. Take a fingerfull of starsan foam and taste it. That will be all you need to convince you. Harmless and tasteless. JeffI'm getting my ass handed to me on this one aren't I?
#33
Posted 29 March 2009 - 06:35 AM
Don't want to start a pissing contest over this, but it is volatile. Per the most well quoted internet resource of super knowledge, the wiki states: Ethanol, also called ethyl alcohol, pure alcohol, grain alcohol, or drinking alcohol, is a volatile, flammable, colorless liquid.Ethanol is not going to be that volatile. Otherwise, all your drinks would be nonalcoholic by the time you finished them. When I mix a pint of this stuff, I keep it tightly capped when not using it.
#34
*_Guest_Matt C_*
Posted 29 March 2009 - 07:12 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users