I'm not super familiar with chocolate and coffee malt so I was hoping someone would share what they think about these when compared to roasted barley with respect to flavor.
roasted barley versus chocolate malt versus coffee malt
Started by
ThroatwobblerMangrove
, Jul 04 2010 09:05 AM
4 replies to this topic
#1
ThroatwobblerMangrove
-
- Members
-
- 4491 posts
Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller
Posted 04 July 2010 - 09:05 AM
#2
MyaCullen
-
- Patron
-
- 68759 posts
Cheap Blue Meanie
- LocationSpokane, WA
Posted 04 July 2010 - 09:19 AM
in contrast to roasted barly Chocolate malt is lighter, sweeter, tangier, less 'burnt" in flavor and color In my perception, no experience with coffee maltI'm not super familiar with chocolate and coffee malt so I was hoping someone would share what they think about these when compared to roasted barley with respect to flavor.
#3
EWW
-
- Patron
-
- 26175 posts
Regular, normal human being
- LocationSomewhere special
Posted 04 July 2010 - 09:26 AM
Coffee malt is somewhere in between chocolate and black patent IMO. You get the more assertive roast profile with less of the acrid notes I associate with black patent.
#4
ThroatwobblerMangrove
-
- Members
-
- 4491 posts
Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller
Posted 04 July 2010 - 10:35 AM
in contrast to roasted barly Chocolate malt is lighter, sweeter, tangier, less 'burnt" in flavor and color In my perception, no experience with coffee malt
sounds like chocolate is more my cup of tea.Coffee malt is somewhere in between chocolate and black patent IMO. You get the more assertive roast profile with less of the acrid notes I associate with black patent.
#5
*_Guest_Matt C_*
*_Guest_Matt C_*
-
- Guests
Posted 04 July 2010 - 04:04 PM
Zym speaking of coffee malt, you forgot to say "no pun intended"....unless of course it was intended,in which case...carry on sir!sounds like chocolate is more my cup of tea.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
