Simplifying
#1
Posted 30 May 2010 - 07:55 AM
#2
Posted 30 May 2010 - 08:14 AM
#3
Posted 30 May 2010 - 10:04 AM
#4
Posted 30 May 2010 - 10:10 AM
#5
Posted 30 May 2010 - 10:21 AM
That would be the same if you were fly sparging b/c the mash step is the same for either method.Hitting mash temps while batch sparging is easy. My preferred technique is raising your strike water to a few degrees above your intended strike water temperature, adding it to the tun before the grain, and allow it too cool down until you have the temperature you want. This allows the tun itself to warm up, and makes it so you really don't have to worry about thermal mass calculations and all that. Nice and simple. Hope the changes work out for you.
#6
Posted 30 May 2010 - 11:33 AM
trueThat would be the same if you were fly sparging b/c the mash step is the same for either method.
#7
Posted 30 May 2010 - 11:57 AM
I agree. Everytime I look at the B3 site & see the brew systems, I start to think "Boy, it would be cool to have/make one of those". Then I slap myself up side the head and remember that my 10 gal Igloo & converted keg has made great beer for over 10 years, and is easy to use & clean. Sometimes simple IS better.I started brewing about 10 years ago in my college dorm with little more than a pot and a bucket. It was our easiest source of decent beer since we weren't yet old enough to buy it. When I got out of school I kept upgrading my brewery in order to make better and better beer. Ultimately I started brewing all grain with HBA's cooler mash/fly sparge system and I upgraded this a couple years ago to an electric HERMS system. Between all the equipment setup and brewing process my brewdays are starting to feel more like a chore than a hobby. Well I'm a slave to homebrewing no more...I tossed all that crap in the basement and pieced together a Denny-style cooler and batch sparge setup. Since I've never batch sparged before I am a little worried about efficiency, something I never worried about with the fly sparging. Also, with a new mash tun hitting the right temp will probably be different than my old system. I suppose both of those things will just take a try and adjust approach. Tomorrow is the first day of the rest of my brewing life. Wish me luck!
#8
Posted 30 May 2010 - 12:24 PM
word.I agree. Everytime I look at the B3 site & see the brew systems, I start to think "Boy, it would be cool to have/make one of those". Then I slap myself up side the head and remember that my 10 gal Igloo & converted keg has made great beer for over 10 years, and is easy to use & clean. Sometimes simple IS better.
#9
Posted 30 May 2010 - 12:25 PM
You know I think you just need to remember that you have been a brewer for many years. I know changing methods can bring about challenges or changes but I am sure you are knowledgable enough that whatever you encounter you will get by and good beer with be made. As I have heard suggested if you are worried about efficiencies and the idea that you might come up shorter or low on your gravities keep that DME around or at worst some table sugare to make up the difference. I say relax and enjoy the new process and see how you fair I am sure it will go well and if it does not turn out exactly how you wanted then you can make adjustments for your second time around too. Good Luck and let us know how it goes for you.I started brewing about 10 years ago in my college dorm with little more than a pot and a bucket. It was our easiest source of decent beer since we weren't yet old enough to buy it. When I got out of school I kept upgrading my brewery in order to make better and better beer. Ultimately I started brewing all grain with HBA's cooler mash/fly sparge system and I upgraded this a couple years ago to an electric HERMS system. Between all the equipment setup and brewing process my brewdays are starting to feel more like a chore than a hobby. Well I'm a slave to homebrewing no more...I tossed all that crap in the basement and pieced together a Denny-style cooler and batch sparge setup. Since I've never batch sparged before I am a little worried about efficiency, something I never worried about with the fly sparging. Also, with a new mash tun hitting the right temp will probably be different than my old system. I suppose both of those things will just take a try and adjust approach. Tomorrow is the first day of the rest of my brewing life. Wish me luck!
+1 on simplicity for sure. I am like you a 10 gallon Rubbermaid cooler with a false bottom and a 10 year old propane burner and 15 gallon stock pot. We get along great and I love the simplicity too. Simpler can be better no doubts!! Cheers!!I agree. Everytime I look at the B3 site & see the brew systems, I start to think "Boy, it would be cool to have/make one of those". Then I slap myself up side the head and remember that my 10 gal Igloo & converted keg has made great beer for over 10 years, and is easy to use & clean. Sometimes simple IS better.
#10
Posted 30 May 2010 - 02:34 PM
#11
Posted 31 May 2010 - 06:13 AM
#12
Posted 31 May 2010 - 08:41 AM
#13
Posted 31 May 2010 - 08:54 AM
#14
Posted 31 May 2010 - 12:15 PM
#15
Posted 31 May 2010 - 12:28 PM
I hear a lot of people say this. Why don't you use it? I really have no concept since I'm using the Denny method with no extra bells and whistles.I dont even use my HERMS any longer, not even for a mashout.
#16
Posted 31 May 2010 - 01:02 PM
I think a lot of people have the MT insulated well enough it holds temps through the mash without it. It is nice for step mashing but I don't think a lot of people feel it's necessary. I use mine almost every session. My MT holds temps great but the recirculation helps my efficiency - but not much. I mashout out because it's already set up and running. And it accomplishes my vorlauf too. So mine gets used.I hear a lot of people say this. Why don't you use it? I really have no concept since I'm using the Denny method with no extra bells and whistles.
#17
Posted 31 May 2010 - 01:09 PM
So what's the benefit of not using it despite having it available?I think a lot of people have the MT insulated well enough it holds temps through the mash without it. It is nice for step mashing but I don't think a lot of people feel it's necessary. I use mine almost every session. My MT holds temps great but the recirculation helps my efficiency - but not much. I mashout out because it's already set up and running. And it accomplishes my vorlauf too. So mine gets used.
#18
Posted 31 May 2010 - 01:12 PM
Saves gas on propane systems. Also not mashing out means transfer to the BK and start your boil, saving you a bit of time sparging. Just guessing, I direct fire my mash tunSo what's the benefit of not using it despite having it available?
#19
Posted 31 May 2010 - 01:58 PM
I'm usually heating ~11 gal for sparging and cleanup anyway. Running the EHERMS during the mash might add $ 0.20 to my electric bill It doesn't cycle on much during the mash. I only recirc for about 10 minutes anyway for the mashout. Last time I checked that got me well over 160 in the MT. But yes, that does add some time......Saves gas on propane systems. Also not mashing out means transfer to the BK and start your boil, saving you a bit of time sparging. Just guessing, I direct fire my mash tun
#20
Posted 31 May 2010 - 02:17 PM
I dont use it because it my final product turns out very nice with or with out it. I dont find the quality of my beer any better using it. My eff. are the same with/without it. As Dj noted, I use a cooler. I nail my mash temps and the cooler holds the temp with no loss. I used my HERMS alot in colder weather when it was easier to come in low on a mash temp or if I lost temp during the mash. But im a season brewer now. I hung up my boot straps a few years ago when I jumped to 20-24g. I'm able to fill kegs for winter now when 10g batches didn't cut it. A long time ago when the KC guys went to the Great Taste at the time the big topic of conversation for home brewers was 20-40 min conversion times. We talked this all the way there. So when we got back and knowing my system, I decided to do a 40min mash, 10min mash out thru the HERMS. Yes, it worked just fine. I was still happy with my product and mash eff. still averaged 85%. Never any lautering problems. So this has been my experience over the years. I know plenty of step mashers using RIMS and HERMS. They make a good product and I really enjoy their beers. But I dont think its any better than what Ive been producing with single infusions. So just find a technique that works for you and run with it. You will make something good. But in the end, I think techniques in the fermenter have way more impact on your beer than the issue at hand.I hear a lot of people say this. Why don't you use it? I really have no concept since I'm using the Denny method with no extra bells and whistles.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users