d-rest
#1
Posted 25 February 2010 - 06:57 PM
#2
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:01 PM
You are almost there according to my calculation. I understand that a d rest can be started when you are approximately 70-75% towards your FG. That would be around 1.026ish. If you wanna start it now go ahead otherwise I would wait another 1-2 days, I personally wait till I hit FG then warm it up to 60-65 for a D rest. Brewer's choice. $0.02I have a lager that I want to d-rest just to be safe.OG: 1.06predicted FG: probably around 1.016I'm currently at about 1.03 (this is 5 days into fermentation).Good time to start the d-rest or too soon??
#3
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:05 PM
In the past I've done that as well but I figured this time around I'd try doing it a little earlier this time. Last time I saw no additional drop in gravity during the d-rest so it kind of made me wonder if it really did anything or not.You are almost there according to my calculation. I understand that a d rest can be started when you are approximately 70-75% towards your FG. That would be around 1.026ish. If you wanna start it now go ahead otherwise I would wait another 1-2 days, I personally wait till I hit FG then warm it up to 60-65 for a D rest. Brewer's choice. $0.02
#4
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:16 PM
#5
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:19 PM
#6
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:21 PM
My line of thinking is that active yeast might do a better job of consuming the dreaded D.The purpose for the d-rest is for the diacetyl to be consumed so just by thinking gravity points, I'd think that would be a moot point. I hear what you're saying though.I've done it a couple times and have waited until I reach FG too.
#7
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:30 PM
#8
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:31 PM
#9
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:34 PM
What about my fermentation temps? Do you think the most critical period with regards to low temp is the initial fermentation? I certainly am not pushing this yeast to the upper end of the temp range but I generally try to keep things below 50F.I will admit to doing this on the fly. I don't really worry too much about when I do it, but it's typically very, very close to the end. I have a "beer bunker" which is a room in my basement with no heat vent. I close the door to that room and my swamp cooler is in there keeping everything cool. The room next to the bunker is where my furnace is so it's noticeably warmer in there. When my lagers are still ticking, but much slower than they were earlier in primary, I take the primary from the cool swamp cooler and place it on a table in the warmer room as a way to d-rest the beer but also to make sure that those last few ticks get knocked off. I have made the mistake of taking the beer out of the swamp cooler and placing it on the cold floor in the bunker only to have the beer slightly underfermented (this would be in the winter only). So I really wouldn't get terribly concerned about this. Some say 66% through primary is okay, but that seems too early to me. There is still active fermentation going on that may take place in the 60s which I don't like the sound of. If you're concerned, swirl it a little and warm it up for the d-rest. Cheers.
#10
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:39 PM
I think that rise in your fermentation temp is fine. 52 is not a temp to worry about with lagers. If you are down to 1.030 then you should be past the point where esters and all are a concern for your beer. I think you will be alright and then you can choose when you wanna do your D rest.What about my fermentation temps? Do you think the most critical period with regards to low temp is the initial fermentation? I certainly am not pushing this yeast to the upper end of the temp range but I generally try to keep things below 50F.
#11
Posted 25 February 2010 - 07:59 PM
I think it's fine. I read somewhere (Noonan's Brewing Lager Beer?) that lager yeast can tolerate a 5° swing in about 24 hours. If you overdo that, they could become cranky. But if the beer was at 48°, you could go down to 43° or up to 53° and still be within that range. That's one reason I like the swamp cooler with 10 gallons of cold water in it... the fluctuations should be kept to a minimum, ensuring that "cool & consistent" thing you want with lagers. I think it's just fine. Btw, what strain are we talking about? I had a conversation with Tess Szamatulski of Clonebrews and asked about d-rests. She said that to her knowledge, the only lager strain that she was absolutely sure required a d-rest was Wyeast 2308 Munich Lager. I have used MANY lager strains and I do a d-rest pretty much every time... never experienced diacetyl. I know it's supposed to taste buttery, but honestly, never tasted it. Cheers.I think that rise in your fermentation temp is fine. 52 is not a temp to worry about with lagers. If you are down to 1.030 then you should be past the point where esters and all are a concern for your beer. I think you will be alright and then you can choose when you wanna do your D rest.
#12
Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:21 AM
Zym, that's also the standard line of thinking as well.My line of thinking is that active yeast might do a better job of consuming the dreaded D.
#13
Posted 26 February 2010 - 04:12 PM
#14
Posted 27 February 2010 - 05:14 AM
that's the stuffI think it's fine. I read somewhere (Noonan's Brewing Lager Beer?) that lager yeast can tolerate a 5° swing in about 24 hours. If you overdo that, they could become cranky. But if the beer was at 48°, you could go down to 43° or up to 53° and still be within that range. That's one reason I like the swamp cooler with 10 gallons of cold water in it... the fluctuations should be kept to a minimum, ensuring that "cool & consistent" thing you want with lagers. I think it's just fine. Btw, what strain are we talking about? I had a conversation with Tess Szamatulski of Clonebrews and asked about d-rests. She said that to her knowledge, the only lager strain that she was absolutely sure required a d-rest was Wyeast 2308 Munich Lager. I have used MANY lager strains and I do a d-rest pretty much every time... never experienced diacetyl. I know it's supposed to taste buttery, but honestly, never tasted it. Cheers.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users