d-rest
#1
Posted 06 January 2010 - 04:51 PM
#2
Posted 06 January 2010 - 04:55 PM
#3 *_Guest_Matt C_*
Posted 06 January 2010 - 05:05 PM
#4
Posted 06 January 2010 - 05:14 PM
#5
Posted 06 January 2010 - 05:16 PM
#6
Posted 06 January 2010 - 05:19 PM
I started to say the same thing but then I realized that I always do one whether I need to or not. I think if nothing else it helps scrub the last point or two off the FG.Do you even need one? I would taste the beer and take an FG reading.
#7 *_Guest_Matt C_*
Posted 06 January 2010 - 05:22 PM
All I know is the butter bomb I made this year I skipped the higher temp rest and I DID NOT taste the diecetyl at all in the samples at first. Only when I packaged the beer did it come thru....noticable isn't the word for it...undrinkable pretty much fits.Do you even need one? I would taste the beer and take an FG reading.
#8
Posted 06 January 2010 - 05:27 PM
It could've formed during transfer.All I know is the butter bomb I made this year I skipped the higher temp rest and I DID NOT taste the diecetyl at all in the samples at first. Only when I packaged the beer did it come thru....noticable isn't the word for it...undrinkable pretty much fits.
Yeah, good point too. Although if it has been fermenting 1.5 weeks, it could be done at this point.I think if nothing else it helps scrub the last point or two off the FG.
#9
Posted 06 January 2010 - 05:37 PM
some people do the d-rest after fermentation is done. I'd rather not taking a gravity reading as that means exposing the beer to extra oxygen.this yeast is notorious for throwing the d that I'd like to rest outIt could've formed during transfer.Yeah, good point too. Although if it has been fermenting 1.5 weeks, it could be done at this point.
#10
Posted 06 January 2010 - 06:20 PM
My logic is that if you want the yeast to do something for you, it seems reasonable to try to get them to do it while they're still active.some people do the d-rest after fermentation is done.
#11
Posted 07 January 2010 - 05:25 AM
it makes sense but doing this at the right time is the tricky part. is it relatively safe to take a hydro reading?My logic is that if you want the yeast to do something for you, it seems reasonable to try to get them to do it while they're still active.
#12
Posted 07 January 2010 - 05:49 AM
Yes its safe to take hydro readings. Do you have a wine thief? If you have that all you need to do is clean it open the airlock take your sample and close it back up. I do it all the time for several years never had a batch go bad. The thiefs are cheap too.My linkit makes sense but doing this at the right time is the tricky part. is it relatively safe to take a hydro reading?
#13
Posted 07 January 2010 - 06:12 AM
I have a turkey basterYes its safe to take hydro readings. Do you have a wine thief? If you have that all you need to do is clean it open the airlock take your sample and close it back up. I do it all the time for several years never had a batch go bad. The thiefs are cheap too.My link
#14
Posted 07 January 2010 - 06:31 AM
#15
Posted 07 January 2010 - 06:45 AM
This is basically krausening, which is usually a technique for carbonating, but the side effect is a diacetyl consumer.I wonder if you could take a butter bomb and add some high gravity sterile wort made from XLDME and reintroduce fermentation at a higher temp and scrub the stuff out?
#16
Posted 07 January 2010 - 05:52 PM
#17
Posted 08 January 2010 - 05:52 AM
saw a couple of bubbles this morning wohoo!gravity is close to final but not quite so I brought the fermenter upstairs - sample didn't taste particularly buttery or anything...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users