Central New England Pale Ale Project
#1
Posted 22 December 2009 - 07:23 PM
#2
Posted 22 December 2009 - 07:44 PM
#3
Posted 22 December 2009 - 07:56 PM
Yeah, the efficiency may be higher, but I'm also trying to fool with my process to learn how I can affect efficiency. I usually do a 45-60 minute fly sparge, but I;m going to cut it back to 30 to see where it leaves me on the efficiency.I bet you will get quite a bit higher efficiency than normal; might want to drop it down a couple of pounds of base malt. Otherwise sounds good; will probably sound better when there isn't as much snow on the ground!
#4
Posted 23 December 2009 - 05:54 AM
sounds good but I actually have a hard time looking at 12 gallon recipes since I'm so used to 5 gallon recipes. It's too early for me to do division that isn't by 2Yeah, the efficiency may be higher, but I'm also trying to fool with my process to learn how I can affect efficiency. I usually do a 45-60 minute fly sparge, but I;m going to cut it back to 30 to see where it leaves me on the efficiency.
#5
Posted 23 December 2009 - 06:20 AM
#6
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:01 AM
Edited by JKoravos, 23 December 2009 - 07:07 AM.
#7
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:22 AM
#8
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:33 AM
#9
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:44 AM
Yeah, I'm wondering how far the yeast is going to attenuate on this one. Although, I intentionally forced this recipe to the high side on the unfermentables. I'd rather end up with a full bodied beer at 2.8% abv, than one that's thin and lifeless at 3.8%. I'd prefer to have to dial the unfermentables down, instead of up on the next iteration. My goal going in was to hit somewhere in the 3.0-3.5% range, so I think I'll be in that range. Hopefully it doesn't finish at 1.018, but that might be an interesting beer, too.Love the idea. I read this first on RSS (which leaves out the poster's name) and I had a hunch it was from you. 1.036 OG with your reduced attenuation mash might be a little extreme. I like the idea of raising the temp on the mash to make up for the reduced initial sugars, but wouldn't this lead to something in the 3.0% ABV range? In any case, this is a great idea. I think your limiting factor on the time for this one being done is the dryhopping as opposed to fermentation and conditioning. Should be an extremely fast ferment. jrc
#10
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:48 AM
I also meant to say - are the IBUs a little high for a session beer?Yeah, I'm wondering how far the yeast is going to attenuate on this one. Although, I intentionally forced this recipe to the high side on the unfermentables. I'd rather end up with a full bodied beer at 2.8% abv, than one that's thin and lifeless at 3.8%. I'd prefer to have to dial the unfermentables down, instead of up on the next iteration. My goal going in was to hit somewhere in the 3.0-3.5% range, so I think I'll be in that range. Hopefully it doesn't finish at 1.018, but that might be an interesting beer, too.
#11
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:55 AM
Yup, I'll definitely be getting the hops ready beforehand for this brew. I think I'm going to try to brew it up this weekend and get it out for the beer pass. I got the idea to use the MO from Mirror Pond, it's super malty and it goes really nice with the all-cascade hop schedule they use. Deschutes doesn't use MO in Mirror Pond, but they do use a Pale Ale malt. I was also thinking of using the 15 lbs of Golden Promise from the group buy for this one.So that's a lot of measuring of hops you have to do there I think the recipe looks good. I've never used american hops with an otherwise pretty english looking recipe. Have you done this before?
#12
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:58 AM
36 IBU? Yeah, the BU:GU ratio is fairly high (1.0), but I don't think it'll overpower the malt side of things since there should be a considerable amount of unfermentables.I also meant to say - are the IBUs a little high for a session beer?
#13
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:59 AM
Is pale ale malt the same as US Pale Ale (different then US 2-row???) that was ordered during the group buy? It was from Canada Malting Company I believe. I'd really like to make a session ale as well...Yup, I'll definitely be getting the hops ready beforehand for this brew. I think I'm going to try to brew it up this weekend and get it out for the beer pass. I got the idea to use the MO from Mirror Pond, it's super malty and it goes really nice with the all-cascade hop schedule they use. Deschutes doesn't use MO in Mirror Pond, but they do use a Pale Ale malt. I was also thinking of using the 15 lbs of Golden Promise from the group buy for this one.
#14
Posted 23 December 2009 - 08:18 AM
#15
Posted 23 December 2009 - 08:19 AM
that explains why my pales have been pretty kick ass and slightly dark edit: I need to make sure the lovibond value in my spreadsheet is correct when I get homeUS 2-row and Pale Ale are different. Pale Ale malt is kilned slightly darker and gives a more malty flavor. Maris Otter/Golden Promise are malted as 'Pale Ale' malts. The Canada Malting actually looks like it's kilned a little darker than a typical US 2-row. It's listed as 2.0-3.5°L, the Thomas Fawcett MO is listed as 2.2-3.0°L. Briess lists their US 2-row as 1.8°L
#16
Posted 23 December 2009 - 08:36 AM
#17
Posted 23 December 2009 - 09:14 AM
I need to try these hops out - I'm pretty noob when it comes to brewing with lots of hops since I buy them a pound at a time.I like your hopping schedule. Columbus with Amarillo is the tastiest, most wonderful of all hop combinations, IMO. It's a good concept. I'll be interested to hear the results.
#18
Posted 23 December 2009 - 11:26 AM
a Pound is only 16 oz. and If you make and Like Red's Rye or any of the Larger IPA's you will quickly go through that Pound. Cascade and Centinal are also Great for these types.. The Columbus hop is pretty big. a pound of that will go a very long way.I need to try these hops out - I'm pretty noob when it comes to brewing with lots of hops since I buy them a pound at a time.
#19
Posted 23 December 2009 - 11:30 AM
I should have said a pound per variety so when I order I'm usually ordering a few pounds. Most 5 gallon batches only use 3-4oz of hops. Even my AIPA only used 7oz.a Pound is only 16 oz. and If you make and Like Red's Rye or any of the Larger IPA's you will quickly go through that Pound. Cascade and Centinal are also Great for these types.. The Columbus hop is pretty big. a pound of that will go a very long way.
#20
Posted 23 December 2009 - 12:13 PM
Needs more hops.....Even my AIPA only used 7oz.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users