Critique my fermentation procedures
#1
Posted 17 December 2009 - 07:24 PM
#2
Posted 17 December 2009 - 08:47 PM
#3
Posted 17 December 2009 - 08:54 PM
#4
Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:05 AM
#5
Posted 18 December 2009 - 06:04 AM
#6
Posted 18 December 2009 - 09:47 AM
#7
Posted 18 December 2009 - 10:16 AM
#8
Posted 18 December 2009 - 10:34 AM
What's the reasoning? I use a blowoff tube on every single batch, even though I seldom get blowoff. I leave it on the entire primary fermentation. I can't see how that would be a problem and I can't recall ever having had a problem I would attribute to the practice.I would limit the blow-off tube to batches that need it only
#9
Posted 18 December 2009 - 10:42 AM
This is my first batch in a very long time, but IIRC we always need a blowoff with the 5 gal carboys. Denny, How often do you rack to secondary? Does it just depend on the style you are brewing?What's the reasoning? I use a blowoff tube on every single batch, even though I seldom get blowoff. I leave it on the entire primary fermentation. I can't see how that would be a problem and I can't recall ever having had a problem I would attribute to the practice.
#10
Posted 18 December 2009 - 11:42 AM
I let the beer make the decision for me. After 2-3 weeks in primary, I take a look at how it's clearing. If it's not cleared at that point, I rack to a secondary. My feeling is that there's something about the physical agitation of moving the beer that makes it drop bright. I could be totally wrong on that, but that's how it seems to work for me.Denny, How often do you rack to secondary? Does it just depend on the style you are brewing?
#11
Posted 18 December 2009 - 04:29 PM
#12
Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:06 PM
My reasoning is that I've seen blow-off tubes that don't really seal off the carboy or that don't stay fully submerged in sanitizer on the other end. Airlocks are easier for me since they seal off the fermentation - nothing is getting in there. I am sure blow-off tubes can be rigged to keep bugs out but I've seen them in use in people's garages and stuff where I'm looking at it thinking there's no way that beer isn't getting sick! At any rate, my main point was that a 5 gal primary carboy seems way too small for primary fermentation.What's the reasoning? I use a blowoff tube on every single batch, even though I seldom get blowoff. I leave it on the entire primary fermentation. I can't see how that would be a problem and I can't recall ever having had a problem I would attribute to the practice.
#13 *_Guest_Matt C_*
Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:47 PM
I see nothing wrong with what you are doing...good choice of beer by the way...a personal favorite as well. My only advice to what you posted is just make sure that fermantation is complete and your FG has been hit.I think I may be exposing my fermenting beer to the open air too much. What do you all think.Here are my basic procedures:1. Transfer cooled wort to 5 gallon carboy and attach blowoff hose.2. Blow off into bucket of sanitizer.3. When foaming subsides remove hose & attach fermentation lock.4. When fermentation slows rack to secondary 5 gal carboy.Am I exposing my beer to the open air too much? I have a batch that tastes like ass right now, and I think that I must have contaminated it somehow even though I have been careful to sanitize thouroughly.SOrry for rambling I am several deep in Bell's Expedition Stout now.
#14
Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:52 PM
#15
Posted 19 December 2009 - 08:33 AM
Same here. I'd even say that once you stop screwing with those little airlock devices you'll be a happier brewer :-) A blowoff tube is just another type of airlock, the type that doesn't have the downsides of the little gadgets.As for the fermentation, once you know it is happening, leave the damn thing alone for a few weeks and let it finish in peace and quiet The problem the OP has might have multiple causes, but because it is the typical "first batch" I'd suggest going over the process and looking at where some details may have been missed such as sanitation and handling. Just opening the fermenter isn't usually a big danger for contamination or oxidation for many reasons, but it should be avoided anyway. He didn't mention how chilling was achieved, and didn't mention what type of "fine mesh" the beer was strained through into the fermenter. Chilling and straining are really big danger areas to examine. So many more thoughts, but my guess is just process errors due to the excitement of the first batch. Good luck on the next one!What's the reasoning? I use a blowoff tube on every single batch, even though I seldom get blowoff. I leave it on the entire primary fermentation. I can't see how that would be a problem and I can't recall ever having had a problem I would attribute to the practice.
#16
Posted 19 December 2009 - 09:38 AM
AFAIK, germs don't climb up a blowoff tube! All I can tell you is that in hundreds of batches I've never had a problem that I could trace to using a blowoff. I agree that a 5 gal. fermenter is too small for a 5 gal. batch, though.My reasoning is that I've seen blow-off tubes that don't really seal off the carboy or that don't stay fully submerged in sanitizer on the other end. Airlocks are easier for me since they seal off the fermentation - nothing is getting in there. I am sure blow-off tubes can be rigged to keep bugs out but I've seen them in use in people's garages and stuff where I'm looking at it thinking there's no way that beer isn't getting sick! At any rate, my main point was that a 5 gal primary carboy seems way too small for primary fermentation.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users