Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Boycott Hansen's Natural Beverage


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#41 stellarbrew

stellarbrew

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 682 posts
  • LocationAcworth, GA

Posted 16 October 2009 - 06:02 AM

If you owned a company, wouldn't you want your product to be thought of and associated with positive characteristics? Once you achieved that level and type of association, wouldn't you fight hard to maintain that?

I think Hansen has taken a major step toward destroying that.

#42 3rd party JKor

3rd party JKor

    Puller of Meats

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 64061 posts
  • LocationNW of Boston

Posted 16 October 2009 - 06:19 AM

Many products work hard to get branded like this. Cars make great examples. Mercedes, BMW, Acura (IMHO)rely on that people think of them as "good cars." "I want a sedan, I will look and see what Mercedes has...."Ben & Jerry sold ice cream because people thought "Ben & Jerry make quality ice cream." Then the only decision was which flavor of ice cream your were going to get. But you knew they were all "good quality ice cream."Hansen has spent money to get people thinking that Hansen is "good soda" or Monster "gives you energy." As far as it being single most valuable asset, sure. You are buying Hansen brand soda. Not soda made in El Segundo, or soda in a round can or the cheapest soda on the shelf. No other assets gets you to put a six pack of Hansen soda in your cart as much as the name.If you owned a company, wouldn't you want your product to be thought of and associated with positive characteristics? Once you achieved that level and type of association, wouldn't you fight hard to maintain that?I think would save any contempt I might have for consumers that fall into some of these traps. zymot

If someone came out with a product that diluted the Monster brand name, I'd be all for the legal action. It only takes the smallest modicum of common sense to see that Rock Art's Vermonster doesn't do that. There are probably thousands of products out there with 'monster' in their name. Like Vermonster, none of them have anything to do with energy drinks.If someone started a car company called Boston Motor Works and was pushing their cars under the BMW moniker, that's diluting a trademark. This garbage with Monster is patent lawyers trying to keep themselves busy.

#43 Stout_fan

Stout_fan

    Frequent Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3115 posts
  • LocationKnoxville, TN

Posted 16 October 2009 - 07:44 AM

Give them a call and tell them what you think of them.It's better than an e-mail, cause each 800 phone call costs Hansen's a few cents:Hansen Beverage CompanyAttention: Customer Relations550 Monica Circle Suite 201Corona, CA 92880orContact us by Phone:1-800-HANSENS or1-800-426-7367

#44 azu

azu

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
  • LocationDarby, PA

Posted 25 October 2009 - 08:36 AM

Just an update that a settlement has been reached on October 22nd!https://www.rockartb...en_satement.pdf

#45 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 25 October 2009 - 09:26 AM

Just an update that a settlement has been reached on October 22nd!https://www.rockartb...en_satement.pdf

so I wonder what the settlement was???

#46 consumptionjunction

consumptionjunction

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 104 posts
  • LocationMiami

Posted 25 October 2009 - 11:20 AM

I heard it was very similar to what Rock Art Brewery attempted to achieve before the C&D letter. That is, that Rock Art would refrain from using the name Vermonster in any way outside of the beer industry. Hansen also agreed not to try to recoup attorney's fees.

#47 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 25 October 2009 - 11:21 AM

I heard it was very similar to what Rock Art Brewery attempted to achieve before the C&D letter. That is, that Rock Art would refrain from using the name Vermonster in any way outside of the beer industry. Hansen also agreed not to try to recoup attorney's fees.

That sounds like a pretty good deal :)

#48 consumptionjunction

consumptionjunction

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 104 posts
  • LocationMiami

Posted 25 October 2009 - 11:22 AM

It's a shame they couldn't try to talk it out in front of a round of beers... amicably or through a brawl, it probably would have ended much quicker.

#49 Deerslyr

Deerslyr

    Disliker of Nut Kicking

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23807 posts
  • LocationGod's Country!

Posted 25 October 2009 - 11:54 AM

That sounds like a pretty good deal :cheers:

I'll be honest... it doesn't sound as great to me. "Monster" needed to come to the plate and say that they wouldn't produce alcoholic beverages under a name that would confuse Vermonster or any of the other 55 beers with Monster in the name.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users