9 replies to this topic

[chadm75]

What's up with the signature restrictions?

[3rd party JKor]

yeah, I tried to update my sig, and it told me it's limited to five lines. I didn't even add any lines to it.

[RommelMagic]

And I also had to take Adriana out too.

[Slainte]

yeah, I tried to update my sig, and it told me it's limited to five lines. I didn't even add any lines to it.

Weird, it told me it was limited to two lines.

[chuck_d]

Weird, it told me it was limited to two lines.

My guess is this is a new feature of the new version of invision board which was recently installed and 2 & 5 are defaults for different user groups. JK is a patron and thus has 5. Just my guess though.

[Connie]

Signatures can get a little long sometimes. I'm not saying it's any one person...

[chuck_d]

Signatures can get a little long sometimes. I'm not saying it's any one person...

...says the only person posting in this thread sans signature

[MtnBrewer]

Chuck's right. It's a new feature. Ret set it at 2 & 5 on a trial basis. We'll see how that goes.

[MtnBrewer]

What about the restriction of no URLs and no images? I find that unfair, but the line limits are fine.

Your sig is a URL and an image.

[MtnBrewer]

Right now, yes. But if I go and update my signature, it forces the new restrictions upon me. These are the current restrictions for my member group:Your signature may contain:

[*] Up to 0 images[*] Images of any size[*] Up to 0 URLs[*] Up to 2 lines[/list]

I'll go have a look. Your group probably didn't get the same privileges that the other groups did. Ret discriminates, you know...Edit: Ok, yours are the same as the regular member group so I guess the intention was to allow URLs and images only for Patrons.