Malting/mashing grains
#1
Posted 28 July 2009 - 06:05 AM
#2
Posted 28 July 2009 - 07:07 AM
#3
Posted 28 July 2009 - 10:06 AM
Basser, I don't doubt you because of your profession, but I"ve got a couple of quick questions.1. Based on your post, I assume it is not necessary to get rid of the acrospire. Is that correct? I'm also assuming that the acrospire doesn't bring anything to the table, so it doesn't matter one way or the other.2. Practically speaking, how would you mill wet grains? I know the OP said it would be "messy", but how would the home brewer go about doing this? 3. Assuming you get a good crush, would one need to use Rice Hulls to compensate for what I assume will be mangled husks?No, you can go straight from sprouting to mashing.The reason that it is kilned are severalfold.1. Storage and transportation.2. Color and flavor gained through the maillard reaction on kilning.Lots of corn whiskey is made by the sprouting to mashing with no kilning.BrewBasser
#4
Posted 28 July 2009 - 12:02 PM
#5
Posted 28 July 2009 - 12:23 PM
#6
Posted 28 July 2009 - 02:09 PM
You wouldn't get rid of it. It is normally removed along with the roots in kilning, although many make it through, just look at the top of your mash sometime. I have no idea what effect it would have. Certainly add more protein that you aren't interested in, that's for sure.Basser, I don't doubt you because of your profession, but I"ve got a couple of quick questions.1. Based on your post, I assume it is not necessary to get rid of the acrospire. Is that correct? I'm also assuming that the acrospire doesn't bring anything to the table, so it doesn't matter one way or the other.
I doubt there is a good homebrewing solution to wet milling. I'm sure that someone could engineer something. Very few pro brewers wet mill. I think north america has 5 wet mills with SNBC owning 3 of those.2. Practically speaking, how would you mill wet grains? I know the OP said it would be "messy", but how would the home brewer go about doing this?
No, wet milling is more gentle on husks, that is why we do it at SNBC.BrewBasser3. Assuming you get a good crush, would one need to use Rice Hulls to compensate for what I assume will be mangled husks?
#7
Posted 28 July 2009 - 02:21 PM
Thanks for the excellent responses. Now I know what's at the top of the mash!You wouldn't get rid of it. It is normally removed along with the roots in kilning, although many make it through, just look at the top of your mash sometime. I have no idea what effect it would have. Certainly add more protein that you aren't interested in, that's for sure.I doubt there is a good homebrewing solution to wet milling. I'm sure that someone could engineer something. Very few pro brewers wet mill. I think north america has 5 wet mills with SNBC owning 3 of those.No, wet milling is more gentle on husks, that is why we do it at SNBC.BrewBasser
#8
Posted 28 July 2009 - 02:29 PM
What does a wet mill do differant than a dry mill? Can you post a few pics of it?You wouldn't get rid of it. It is normally removed along with the roots in kilning, although many make it through, just look at the top of your mash sometime. I have no idea what effect it would have. Certainly add more protein that you aren't interested in, that's for sure.I doubt there is a good homebrewing solution to wet milling. I'm sure that someone could engineer something. Very few pro brewers wet mill. I think north america has 5 wet mills with SNBC owning 3 of those.No, wet milling is more gentle on husks, that is why we do it at SNBC.BrewBasser
#9
Posted 28 July 2009 - 02:46 PM
#10
Posted 28 July 2009 - 02:53 PM
Well, since I'm supposed to read this anyways, I just opened up Kunze to theWhat does a wet mill do differant than a dry mill? Can you post a few pics of it?
Edited by chuck_d, 28 July 2009 - 02:55 PM.
#12
Posted 28 July 2009 - 02:56 PM
Yeah this, but they still make them.BrewBasserWell, since I'm supposed to read this anyways, I just opened up Kunze to the
secondsection called Wet Milling.One of the advantages he mentions is that with dry milling the husks get damaged more easily. With wet milling the husks are almost undamaged and therefore you get better mash separation. It looks like water is basically sprayed onto the grains in the hopper, that water is recirc'd on top. And now that I read this, the steeping last long enough to get the grain moisture up to 35-40% which is just a tad under the 45-48% I read for malting steeping processes. The corns are said to squeeze right out of their husks, so you have these corns and their shells just going into the mash tun, it looks like they run the wet mills at narrower gaps than dry mills because it's so easy to squeeze out the corns.The last sentence in the section... "Wet mills are no longer manufactured."
#14
Posted 28 July 2009 - 04:17 PM
Is that the same surface as the rollers in the ones you use?The almost straight across groves instead of the knurl that we are used to seeing?Do you have a problem with the grain sticking to the rollers or is there a scraping system? Are there feed issues?I found this for $3235.00And this for $219.95Would the cheaper one do the same job?HERE is the link to the brochure for the millstar that we have (or one very like it.BrewBasser
#15
Posted 28 July 2009 - 04:29 PM
Did you notice, among the many things that Pleasant Hill Grain claims the mill to be able to grind, was "BONES"? REALLY!!! BONES!!! I shit you not. I had to do a double take and make sure I read that correctly? What? Like Ed Ghein or Jeffrey Dahmer is calling up and asking for a mill that will take care of BONES???LOLI'm sure it's just meant for errant bones and cartiliedge in grinding meat or something... otherwise I'd want an explanation.Is that the same surface as the rollers in the ones you use?The almost straight across groves instead of the knurl that we are used to seeing?Do you have a problem with the grain sticking to the rollers or is there a scraping system? Are there feed issues?I found this for $3235.00And this for $219.95Would the cheaper one do the same job?
#16
Posted 28 July 2009 - 04:47 PM
Yes.Is that the same surface as the rollers in the ones you use?The almost straight across groves instead of the knurl that we are used to seeing?
No. No, and no.Do you have a problem with the grain sticking to the rollers or is there a scraping system? Are there feed issues?
I'm not sure how well they would work. The cheaper one looks like a corona mill with lipstick. I got it for 30 bucks. (BTW, I use a corona mill for homebrewing)BrewBasserI found this for $3235.00And this for $219.95Would the cheaper one do the same job?
#17
Posted 28 July 2009 - 04:48 PM
Marrow is the secret flavoring in Soylent Green.Did you notice, among the many things that Pleasant Hill Grain claims the mill to be able to grind, was "BONES"? REALLY!!! BONES!!! I shit you not. I had to do a double take and make sure I read that correctly? What? Like Ed Ghein or Jeffrey Dahmer is calling up and asking for a mill that will take care of BONES???LOLI'm sure it's just meant for errant bones and cartiliedge in grinding meat or something... otherwise I'd want an explanation.
#18
Posted 28 July 2009 - 05:02 PM
OK great. A few more questions and I might have enough info to make a homebrew sized version. :)Are the grooves straight across the roll or are they on a slight helix? How many grooves per inch?Yes.No. No, and no.I'm not sure how well they would work. The cheaper one looks like a corona mill with lipstick. I got it for 30 bucks. (BTW, I use a corona mill for homebrewing)BrewBasser
#19
Posted 28 July 2009 - 05:06 PM
Slight helix. You would have to ask Huppmann.BrewBasserOK great. A few more questions and I might have enough info to make a homebrew sized version. :)Are the grooves straight across the roll or are they on a slight helix? How many grooves per inch?
#20
Posted 28 July 2009 - 05:08 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users