Proper water for an Oktoberfest
#1
Posted 14 September 2012 - 04:23 AM
#2
Posted 14 September 2012 - 04:39 AM
#3
Posted 14 September 2012 - 04:48 AM
Edited by StudsTerkel, 14 September 2012 - 04:50 AM.
#4
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:57 AM
Edited by KenLenard, 14 September 2012 - 05:59 AM.
#5
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:16 AM
#6
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:54 AM
#7
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:13 AM
I occasionally use acid malt but more commonly just use some lactic acid to adjust the mash and/or sparge pH. I would think that could have a similar effect. Funny that you mention the Pils because I was just about to make a starter with WLP830 so I could make a Pilsner which will probably be a bit of a mash-up between German and Bohemian styles. Pils, some Vienna, Tettnanger to bitter and then late Saaz. Everything I read says that adding gypsum to this style is inappropriate. If I cut my water in half and dilute w/RO, my sulfate number would be 14. AJ DeLange has said that the lower the sulfate the better. I wonder about this. I planned to use about 4 ounces of hops in this Pils and wonder if that will make up for low sulfate. I suppose I could add a small amount like ½ gram to the mash just to add some crispness but I would hate to bring out harshness between the hops and water. I have concluded that I am just a very slow learner when it comes to matching water profiles to beer styles.Ken, I would trust Martin B's Bru'n water for the profile. He put a lot of research in before using those in his program.Do you use acid malt in your mash? I find that it has added a little "pop" to my beers. Just looked at my recent Bopils and I did 67ppm chloride, 31 sulfate and 1% acid malt and it has a nice crispness to it.
#8
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:32 AM
#9
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:37 AM
#10
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:45 AM
#11
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:55 AM
#12
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:58 AM
Yep, the bopils was 19ppm overall post sparge. I added a bunch of saaz to my whirlpool and am digging it. I didn't add gypsum to the bopils I brewed before this last one and felt it was lacking something. This one has a few diff things though--acid malt, gypsum, and the whirlpool addition, so hard to pinpoint if the improvement was from exactly one thing or a combo of several.The point I was poorly trying to make with my other post was that, If I think gypsum will add to any style, I will add it. I don't get hung up on regional styles or regional water profiles too much.Right. It makes sense if you look at it carefully... you have a lot of Munich in an Oktoberfest and you're typically not hopping the bejesus out of it (I bittering with about 6.5 AAU of hops at the start of the boil and that's all) and both of those things would lean towards the malty/sweet/soft side of things. Without sulfate, late hops or something to balance it, the beer will be overly soft.Chils: That 19ppm of sulfate was what... an overall ppm for all of the water? For the Pils or for an Oktoberfest you're referring to? Just curious. On the Pils, I could see relatively soft water but then firm bitterness up front and late hops additions to give the beer more snap. This Pils I'm envisioning would have it's last hop addition as the whirlpool addition we were talking about earlier. That addition being Saaz... my mouth is watering already.
#13
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:23 AM
#14
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:42 AM
I actually did target Martin's "Amber Malty" profile for this beer. He suggests:Calcium 55Magnesium 5Sodium 15Sulfate 35Chloride 49Bicarb 105I used 100% filtered tap water and added 2g of CaCl to the mash which brought the overall numbers to:Calcium 52Magnesium 12Sodium 4Sulfate 27Chloride 53Bicarb 113Maybe the Sodium number being slightly low in addition to the sulfate being 8ppm low could account for the overly-soft profile of this beer. I know the Magnesium, Sodium and Sulfate can ALL contribute to crispness so that may be the issue. I tried to get as close as possible to his profile w/o overdoing the additions but maybe a pinch of kosher salt & gypsum could've brought this up.Trying to match the water of a particular city is a fool's errand as Martin has pointed out many times. You don't have any idea of when or how it was measured, which is why you can find such widely differing reports. Beer styles developed in response to the water that brewers had to work with, so if you stick with adjusting water by Martin's color/flavor parameters you'll have better results.
Edited by KenLenard, 14 September 2012 - 09:45 AM.
#15
Posted 14 September 2012 - 10:16 AM
#16
Posted 14 September 2012 - 10:59 AM
#17
Posted 14 September 2012 - 11:28 AM
Edited by denny, 14 September 2012 - 11:28 AM.
#18
Posted 14 September 2012 - 11:41 AM
I guess I really need to make Martin's water profiles my new mantra. I say this because I started sniffing around asking people about proper water profiles for various styles of beer and didn't get much useful feedback. I think it's helpful for people to share information about what they did with their water for various styles... not where they started (because all of our water is different) but where they ended, with each of the main ions and their ppms. I suppose that Martin's sheet is the closest I have seen to this information and it is pretty robust. My next beer will be this Pils with 830 and I'm going to try to get close to his "yellow balanced" profile and see what happens. Thanks gang!Ken, it sounds like you're basically on track. I suggest you shoot Martin an email and ask his opinion. He's a great guy and usually replies promptly.
#19
Posted 14 September 2012 - 11:49 AM
#20
Posted 14 September 2012 - 12:13 PM
httpss://sites.google.com/site/brunwater/There is a water knowledge section to the spreadsheet.How about a link or book to look to for water info from Martin?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users