
Black IPA
#1
Posted 19 February 2011 - 01:05 PM
#2
Posted 19 February 2011 - 01:10 PM
It's pretty tasty as a style, also being called Cascadia Dark Ale IIRCI just posted a review of Otter Creek's Alpine Black IPA in that other part of the forum. Until I brought it home (in a sampler pack), I had never heard of such a thing. I wasn't sure what to make of it. Besides the obvious problem with the name (pale black what?), I was pretty impressed by the beer. Then I read this article and discovered it is a thing. Did you guys know about this? It sounds like it kind of originated in the east. Maybe that is why I didn't know. What do y'all think? Apparently there is even an AHA category.
#3
Posted 19 February 2011 - 01:13 PM
Both zymurgy and byo had cover stories and recipes about these atthe same time a while back, so I felt like I should make one. I enjoyed it, haven't had many commercial examples yet.I just posted a review of Otter Creek's Alpine Black IPA in that other part of the forum. Until I brought it home (in a sampler pack), I had never heard of such a thing. I wasn't sure what to make of it. Besides the obvious problem with the name (pale black what?), I was pretty impressed by the beer. Then I read this article and discovered it is a thing. Did you guys know about this? It sounds like it kind of originated in the east. Maybe that is why I didn't know. What do y'all think? Apparently there is even an AHA category.
#4
Posted 19 February 2011 - 01:37 PM
I like that name better. IMO, IPA is a style. Black IPA makes no sense. I associate Cascadia with Washington State, and I'm not sure how it connects, but I like the way it sounds.It's pretty tasty as a style, also being called Cascadia Dark Ale IIRC
#5
Posted 19 February 2011 - 01:40 PM
they claim it originated out west, not in the east. I agree black IPA makes no sense. Sort of like an imperial mild.I like that name better. IMO, IPA is a style. Black IPA makes no sense. I associate Cascadia with Washington State, and I'm not sure how it connects, but I like the way it sounds.
#6
Posted 19 February 2011 - 01:42 PM
#7
Posted 19 February 2011 - 01:47 PM

#8
Posted 19 February 2011 - 02:21 PM
Edited by BlKtRe, 19 February 2011 - 02:21 PM.
#9
Posted 19 February 2011 - 02:29 PM
There is a Cascade mountain range in Vermont, huh, being from the NW I assumed The Cascades, near wher almost all US Hops are grownYup. We have been making Black IpA's (Cascadian) for awhile now. Originated in the Cascade Mountains. The style was invented by Greg Noonan in Vermont in the early 1990s.

#10
Posted 20 February 2011 - 05:32 AM
#11
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:15 AM
#12
Posted 21 February 2011 - 06:10 AM
#13
Posted 21 February 2011 - 09:43 AM
#14
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:11 AM
#15
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:47 AM
so make an ipa and add sinamar? not much of a styleIt's called Cascadian Dark Ale because it's a style popularized in the NW region known as Cascadia. I'll make no claims as to who might have invented it first but out here is where it became a phenomenon and is now an everyday name. A bartender won't bat an eye if you order a CDA; they know what you're talking about. Now I realize that you can't be a style guideline purist and a CDA advocate at the same time. That being said, I'm a bit miffed at the direction the rest of the country has taken the style while still calling the product CDA. Originally, the purpose was to be able to taste the beer blindfolded and believe that it's damn good IPA, then open your eyes and see a pitch black beer in your glass. Now brewers are using all sorts of roasty malts and making hoppy stouts. These aren't CDA, they are barely even IBA. I've even seen them with coffee and chocolate in the recipes. I'm ALL for experimentation and new beers but come on... calling some of these beers CDA is a sad attempt at capitalizing on an up and coming trend. [/end rant]Cascadian Region (for clarification)

#16
Posted 21 February 2011 - 11:08 AM
If there was, it would be a BJCP category, not AHA, but there isn't. I have yet to find one of those I like and feel is more than a gimmick.Apparently there is even an AHA category.
#17
Posted 21 February 2011 - 11:09 AM
That's because they were a fad, not good beers.CDAs were a big deal around here a few years ago, but now it seems like they are starting to taper off. No scientific evidence, just anecdotal from going to the local beerfests.
#18
Posted 21 February 2011 - 01:33 PM
Fad or not I dont think these are bad beers. I find the black color without any flavor components from the Carafa and all those hops a IpA has intriguing.That's because they were a fad, not good beers.
#19
Posted 21 February 2011 - 01:33 PM
#20
Posted 21 February 2011 - 01:47 PM
if this is the case would it truly just be an IPA that is dark with no discernible flavor difference? I haven't had many of these. I think the one I did have was at CBC and it had some roast flavor.Ouch! Denny harshin' on the CDA!I've only had one, 21st Amendment's, it was a good beer. Overall that style doesn't appeal to me all that much, but that doesn't mean it can't taste good. It seems like a lot of breweries are putting it in their year round beer list, so I wouldn't be that surprised to see it become a BJCP style down the road.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users