
Classic English IPA
#1
Posted 22 January 2011 - 06:19 PM
#2
Posted 22 January 2011 - 06:32 PM
Edited by djinkc, 22 January 2011 - 06:44 PM.
#3
Posted 22 January 2011 - 06:38 PM
#4
Posted 22 January 2011 - 06:42 PM
#5
Posted 22 January 2011 - 07:24 PM
what would you use? if I were to use something else I would have to use quite a bit.This is a style you could bump the crystal a bit(can't believe I just said that), and use sugar to reach the desired FG. I agree with DJ on the IBU's, I also wouldn't use Magnum it's too clean for the style.
#6
Posted 22 January 2011 - 07:46 PM
I usually have too many hops on hand so I would use all english. If you don't I would think a mix of the magnum and some ekg would be doable. Maybe even use the ekg at 45 along with the magnum at 60 to add more of the flavor. Say an ounce of mags at 60 and an ounce and a half of ekg at 45. Im in a brewpub on my phone so didnt calculate the ibus but it may be workable.what would you use? if I were to use something else I would have to use quite a bit.
#7
Posted 22 January 2011 - 08:04 PM
#8
Posted 22 January 2011 - 08:20 PM
Good point, I forgot to mention his mash temp. I was thinking 150 or 152 depending the yeast, if the fullers yeast hed be ok at 148(woth the higher crystal), but a dryer finishing yeast def a higher mash.I would prefer to mash at 152ish if you could hit it.148 degrees would still do.IMHO.
#9
Posted 23 January 2011 - 06:33 AM
based on the reading I'm doing the original IPAs were very dry so that's kind of what I was going for.Good point, I forgot to mention his mash temp. I was thinking 150 or 152 depending the yeast, if the fullers yeast hed be ok at 148(woth the higher crystal), but a dryer finishing yeast def a higher mash.
#10
Posted 23 January 2011 - 06:34 AM
Why no wheat? I was thinking it would be nice for head retention. I don't have any biscuit but I do have some special roast - would a touch of this work?Me, I would lose the wheat and add some Biscuit. The IBU's are a little high for style but it's your beer. I don't brew these much.
#11
Posted 23 January 2011 - 06:36 AM
#12
Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:18 AM
Doing a bit of research I learned something. I remembered styrian goldings are an English based hop exported to some part of eastern Europe, Slovenia or somewhere sazz come from... something like that. Styrian being some geographic reference. I assumed the goldings meant that East Kent Goldings were the exported hop. The first three references I found say that Fuggles are the hop exported to easten Europe. I love my EKG. My experience with fuggle has not been as positive. In fact I do not use them. Maybe you have an established opinion about fuggles or Styrians, and you should certainly go with that. It is also true that fuggles show up in many, many english recipes. Many homebrewers like their fuggles, I might be in the minority opinion. I have no opinion about Styrian specifically, other than their lineage, which is subject to debate. I guess I have not been of much help, other than providing a hop ancestory lesson.also - I didn't see any responses on the styrian goldings. will these work alright?
#13
Posted 23 January 2011 - 10:25 AM
I used them in a pale ale recently that I think tastes good. I too love EKGs but unfortunately there weren't any available when I placed my last order from hops direct. So I figured I'd work with what I have. It says they are also similar to willys and I like those so I think I'll be alright.Doing a bit of research I learned something. I remembered styrian goldings are an English based hop exported to some part of eastern Europe, Slovenia or somewhere sazz come from... something like that. Styrian being some geographic reference. I assumed the goldings meant that East Kent Goldings were the exported hop. The first three references I found say that Fuggles are the hop exported to easten Europe. I love my EKG. My experience with fuggle has not been as positive. In fact I do not use them. Maybe you have an established opinion about fuggles or Styrians, and you should certainly go with that. It is also true that fuggles show up in many, many english recipes. Many homebrewers like their fuggles, I might be in the minority opinion. I have no opinion about Styrian specifically, other than their lineage, which is subject to debate. I guess I have not been of much help, other than providing a hop ancestory lesson.
#14
Posted 23 January 2011 - 12:28 PM
Special Roast or Victory might be OK to sub for biscuitWhy no wheat? I was thinking it would be nice for head retention. I don't have any biscuit but I do have some special roast - would a touch of this work?
#15
Posted 23 January 2011 - 12:36 PM
#16
Posted 24 January 2011 - 08:39 AM
I'm a little curious as to how biscuit is a sub for wheat? maybe that's not what you guys mean b/c to me they would accomplish very different things.Wheat is OK, you could go with DJ's advice and substitute with biscuit.
#17
Posted 27 January 2011 - 05:23 PM
Edited by mashleyJwilliams, 27 January 2011 - 05:31 PM.
#18
Posted 27 January 2011 - 05:48 PM
I'm a little curious as to how biscuit is a sub for wheat? maybe that's not what you guys mean b/c to me they would accomplish very different things.
I didn't mean it as a sub, but a swap. Biscuit, IMO, will give it a bit more British character. Wheat won't do that, but I put a little in a lot of beers for the hell of it sometimes - never would in a British Ale. I think the MO will give plenty of head retention. Since you had Classic English IPA as a goal I suggested the change. I think over the pond back then they would put cane sugar in before Wheat malt. But, I already posted these don't get brewed at my place much. And, time to do some again. I'm getting boring..............
It goes back to how the style came to be. It was cheaper because of taxes to add sugar rather than malt/other grains. Plus the British malts could handle a little sugar and still throw malt at you in the glass. Most of the close - to all - MO beers I've brewed had a nice enough head to shave with. But that would be a waste of beer


eta, just saw the grain bill, dump the wheat and bump the SR to at least a pound. But hey, it's your beer and looks tasty.
Edited by djinkc, 27 January 2011 - 05:53 PM.
#19
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:24 AM
Have you used special roast? I feel like a pound of that stuff would overpower everything else. Maybe that's a misconception on my part but I always use it sparingly.I didn't mean it as a sub, but a swap. Biscuit, IMO, will give it a bit more British character. Wheat won't do that, but I put a little in a lot of beers for the hell of it sometimes - never would in a British Ale. I think the MO will give plenty of head retention. Since you had Classic English IPA as a goal I suggested the change. I think over the pond back then they would put cane sugar in before Wheat malt. But, I already posted these don't get brewed at my place much. And, time to do some again. I'm getting boring..............
It goes back to how the style came to be. It was cheaper because of taxes to add sugar rather than malt/other grains. Plus the British malts could handle a little sugar and still throw malt at you in the glass. Most of the close - to all - MO beers I've brewed had a nice enough head to shave with. But that would be a waste of beersince I have a beard.
![]()
eta, just saw the grain bill, dump the wheat and bump the SR to at least a pound. But hey, it's your beer and looks tasty.
#20
Posted 28 January 2011 - 06:56 AM
Not just in YOUR head , i used 12oz in a light brown ale and was a lot of roasty.Since then, i use no more than 4oz in a 5.5 gallon brew.Lots of discussion for one brew,Grind the grains already!Have you used special roast? I feel like a pound of that stuff would overpower everything else. Maybe that's a misconception on my part but I always use it sparingly.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users