
Smoked beers
#1
*_Guest_Matt C_*
Posted 26 September 2010 - 07:19 PM
#2
Posted 26 September 2010 - 07:59 PM
#3
Posted 28 September 2010 - 11:31 AM
#4
*_Guest_Matt C_*
Posted 28 September 2010 - 07:23 PM
Excellent point. Well, I was not looking to make a rauchbier exactly, at least not in the traditional way. I've read somewhere that maltsters used to kiln or dry the malt with wood smoke which makes sense to me as that was all they had back then. I think a general smokiness is more what I'm looking to do with this one. I did however buy the lager yeast specifically for this recipe. I think the scottish yeast will be more fitting for what I'm trying to accomplish.Either yeast will make good beer, obviously, but traditionally, and in my humble opinion, the lager yeast might be the better way to go. I would also jack up the base malt to use closer to 100% smoked malt. No need to fear the smoke. If you are afraid, then just bump it up to 4 pounds or something. But I assure you, don't worry, it will be plenty drinkable. And then, with the greater smoked malt and lager yeast, you should be able to call this beer a true rauchbier. Otherwise, it might not have a lot of smoke, and the perceptions of smokiness will be confused between your smoked malt versus any peat-like Scottish smokiness from the yeast strain. Which brings me to my next point... The smoky character you get from wood-smoked malt is entirely different from that of peat-smoked malt; and Scottish ale yeast is said to give a slight mellow smokiness more similar to the peat smoke, NOT to wood-smoked malt. So... you need to figure out what you are going for -- complex smokiness (in general), for which you could use the Scottish yeast strain, versus a traditional rauchbier, which really requires a lager strain and more of the smoked malt. That decision, of course, is entirely up to you.
#5
Posted 21 October 2010 - 05:49 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users