Jump to content


- - - - -

Smoked beers


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 *_Guest_Matt C_*

*_Guest_Matt C_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 September 2010 - 07:19 PM

I took some american 2 row and smoked it for about 35-45 mins with apple wood. It was a cold smoke so no heat therefore no additional kilning.My anticipated recipe originally used wyeast bohemian lager yeast. But now I'm thinking that I should use my house yeast: Wyeast scottish ale strain. I only have the Tett hops in there for (some) hop flavor/aroma. What I'm leaning toward is just using magnum for a bittering hop addition only. If you were in my shoes which yeast would you use/more prefer: clean Lager yeast- making the subtle apple smoke come forward cleanly......or Scottish ale yeast- probably the best ale yeast as far as complimenting the smoke flavor and adding depth to it.Recipe:Bottle Of SmokeRecipe Specifications--------------------------Batch Size: 6.50 gal Boil Size: 8.30 galEstimated OG: 1.055 SGEstimated Color: 12.2 SRMEstimated IBU: 21.3 IBUBrewhouse Efficiency: 74.00 %Boil Time: 60 MinutesIngredients:------------Amount Item Type % or IBU 10 lbs Brewers Malt 2-Row (Briess) (1.8 SRM) Grain 76.92 % 2 lbs Smoked Malt (1.8 SRM) Grain 15.38 % 12.0 oz Munich II (Weyermann) (9.0 SRM) Grain 5.77 % 4.0 oz Chocolate (Crisp) (440.0 SRM) Grain 1.92 % 15.00 gm Magnum [14.00 %] (60 min) Hops 20.9 IBU 28.00 gm Tettnang [3.20 %] (1 min) Hops 0.4 IBU 1 Pkgs Bohemian Lager (Wyeast Labs #2124) Total Grain Weight: 13.00 lb Notes:------Malt will be cold smoked with apple wood. Spritz malt with water to allow smoke to adhere to malt better. Will try 30 min heavy smoke to begin.

#2 davelew

davelew

    Comptroller of ACMSO That Are Not Beans

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 20702 posts
  • LocationReading, Massachusetts

Posted 26 September 2010 - 07:59 PM

My recommendation: Scottish ale yeast. I have limited experience with smoked beers (N=2) but in both cases the smokiness faded rapidly, and after a couple of months was maybe half strength. Because of that, I would want to drink it young, and using an ale yeast instead of a lager yeast will help that.

#3 dmtaylor

dmtaylor

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 326 posts
  • LocationTwo Rivers, WI

Posted 28 September 2010 - 11:31 AM

Either yeast will make good beer, obviously, but traditionally, and in my humble opinion, the lager yeast might be the better way to go.I would also jack up the base malt to use closer to 100% smoked malt. No need to fear the smoke. If you are afraid, then just bump it up to 4 pounds or something. But I assure you, don't worry, it will be plenty drinkable. And then, with the greater smoked malt and lager yeast, you should be able to call this beer a true rauchbier.Otherwise, it might not have a lot of smoke, and the perceptions of smokiness will be confused between your smoked malt versus any peat-like Scottish smokiness from the yeast strain. Which brings me to my next point...The smoky character you get from wood-smoked malt is entirely different from that of peat-smoked malt; and Scottish ale yeast is said to give a slight mellow smokiness more similar to the peat smoke, NOT to wood-smoked malt.So... you need to figure out what you are going for -- complex smokiness (in general), for which you could use the Scottish yeast strain, versus a traditional rauchbier, which really requires a lager strain and more of the smoked malt. That decision, of course, is entirely up to you.

#4 *_Guest_Matt C_*

*_Guest_Matt C_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2010 - 07:23 PM

Either yeast will make good beer, obviously, but traditionally, and in my humble opinion, the lager yeast might be the better way to go. I would also jack up the base malt to use closer to 100% smoked malt. No need to fear the smoke. If you are afraid, then just bump it up to 4 pounds or something. But I assure you, don't worry, it will be plenty drinkable. And then, with the greater smoked malt and lager yeast, you should be able to call this beer a true rauchbier. Otherwise, it might not have a lot of smoke, and the perceptions of smokiness will be confused between your smoked malt versus any peat-like Scottish smokiness from the yeast strain. Which brings me to my next point... The smoky character you get from wood-smoked malt is entirely different from that of peat-smoked malt; and Scottish ale yeast is said to give a slight mellow smokiness more similar to the peat smoke, NOT to wood-smoked malt. So... you need to figure out what you are going for -- complex smokiness (in general), for which you could use the Scottish yeast strain, versus a traditional rauchbier, which really requires a lager strain and more of the smoked malt. That decision, of course, is entirely up to you.

Excellent point. Well, I was not looking to make a rauchbier exactly, at least not in the traditional way. I've read somewhere that maltsters used to kiln or dry the malt with wood smoke which makes sense to me as that was all they had back then. I think a general smokiness is more what I'm looking to do with this one. I did however buy the lager yeast specifically for this recipe. I think the scottish yeast will be more fitting for what I'm trying to accomplish.

#5 Fatman

Fatman

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts
  • LocationWest Chester, PA

Posted 21 October 2010 - 05:49 AM

Inspired by Hacker Pschorr Oktoberfest, I just bought a sack of Munich, and decided to do my annual smoked ale as a Aecht Schlenkerla style smoked Marzen. Additionally, I just spent most of my summer weekends building a custom version of the Big Baby smoker:https://www.thesmokering.com/pits/metalpit/bigbaby/default.jspSo, I'm smoking my own malt too - I did up 4 pounds of Pils malt over a hot hickory smoke for 60 minutes, stirred and lightly sparyed with water.Well, it may have been a little too hot - in part because I threw dinner - turkey wings and drums - in too, and I smoked at about 275 in order to get the proper internal temp for the poultry. The end result is that my Smoked Pils malt is decently kilned too - I'd estimate about 40L. Despite what the Zymurgy article on smoking your own malt says, the malt is not throwing an insane amount of aroma - it's smoky, but not really any stronger than Weyerman's Beechwood smoked malt, which I've used up to 60% in my smoked ale and liked it. (I love smoke, it's hard to oversmoke a beer for my taste)Soooo.... What about this recipe? I was thinking CaraMunich originally, but am leaning towards leaving it out because of the kilning of the smoked malt:Smoked Marzen (6 Gal):6.5 lbs. Munich4 lbs. Smoked Pilsner 40L2 oz. U.S. Hallertau (4.5 AA) @ 60 minO.G. 1.052 (80% eff.)Mash @ 148IBU 27WLP802What do y'all think?Also the Turkey was AMAZING - here's a recipe:2 Wings, 2 DrumsBrine for 2 hours in fridge (1/2 c. of Kosher salt per quart of water)Rub with 1/2 c. Brown Sugar, 1/4 c. Kosher Salt, 1 tsp. garlic powder, 1 tsp. onion powder, 1/2 tsp. sageSmoke over natural charcoal & hickory chunks for 2 hrs @ 275Oven @ 375 for 20 min until internal temp hits 175I would have smoked all the way, but it was getting late, next time I will alot 3 hours for the smoke (doesn't make too much difference - meat stops taking smoke flavor at around 120 deg)


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users