Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Trub: Remove or Leave?


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

Poll: Trub Removal (0 member(s) have cast votes)

Regarding trub, do you:

  1. Siphon everything into your fermentor, trub and all (11 votes [42.31%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 42.31%

  2. Siphon only the wort off the top and leave the trub in the kettle (15 votes [57.69%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 57.69%

Also, for anyone who has experimented with siphoning or leaving the trub, has there been a noticeable difference in your beers?

  1. Yes, more off-flavors with trub (1 votes [3.85%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

  2. No, no detectable difference (13 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  3. Other (please explain below) (2 votes [7.69%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.69%

  4. Have not experimented with trub (10 votes [38.46%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 38.46%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 VirginiaBeach

VirginiaBeach

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 57 posts

Posted 15 December 2009 - 03:50 PM

I figured I'd put this up for debate/discussion as I'm wondering if removing the trub actually makes a difference. Maybe it's important for a delicate beer like a pilsener but less important for more robust ales?

#2 No Party JKor

No Party JKor

    Puller of Meats

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 66308 posts
  • LocationNW of Boston

Posted 15 December 2009 - 04:09 PM

Ideally, remove it, but I don't think it's a huge issue for homebrewers.

#3 Deerslyr

Deerslyr

    Disliker of Nut Kicking

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23807 posts
  • LocationGod's Country!

Posted 15 December 2009 - 04:28 PM

I did not vote. I whirlpool and drain with a bazooka screen offset to the side. Works just fine for me. And FWIW, I don't bag my hops, regardless of whether its leaf or pellet.

#4 MtnBrewer

MtnBrewer

    Skynet Architect

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6695 posts
  • LocationThe Springs

Posted 15 December 2009 - 04:42 PM

I don't siphon either. I whirlpool and drain just as Deerslyr described.

#5 Steve Urquell

Steve Urquell

    Hot Loader

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3874 posts
  • LocationOzarks

Posted 15 December 2009 - 05:27 PM

I didn't vote b/c of how I handle my wort. I scoop mine out of the kettle with a sanitized 3qt. pot and pour thru a fine mesh strainer. I used to stress over the trub and sanitize a grain sack and stretch it over a large strainer to get every bit of trub I could.After countless batches, now I get out what I can and don't worry about it too much.

#6 RommelMagic

RommelMagic

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 454 posts
  • LocationHighland Falls, NY

Posted 15 December 2009 - 05:39 PM

I use a counter flow chiller and empty right into the carboy so pretty much everything ends up in there, except hops. That is until I get a whirlpool set up.

#7 MakeMeHoppy

MakeMeHoppy

    Redundancy Comptroller of Redundancy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 11593 posts
  • LocationSlower Lower Delaware

Posted 15 December 2009 - 06:48 PM

I whirlpool with a spoon and let it settle for 20 minutes or so after I chill. I use hop bags that I remove before chilling. When I siphon I have the goal of leaving all the trub behind, but in reality I grab some because I get a little greedy and don't want to leave too much beer behind. I notice no difference with the same beers made when I use to dump all of the trub and hop material into the fermenter.

#8 VirginiaBeach

VirginiaBeach

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 57 posts

Posted 15 December 2009 - 07:24 PM

Well I was most concerned with whether or not people take or leave the trub, and any differences in flavor, not so much whether it's siphoned or drained. I just tried to edit the poll but for some reason it won't let me. Anyways, I'm just trying to get peoples opinions on whether they leave the trub in the kettle or put it into the fermentor with the wort, and if there's any effect on the finished product, regardless of how it gets there (siphon or draining, or otherwise)

#9 No Party JKor

No Party JKor

    Puller of Meats

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 66308 posts
  • LocationNW of Boston

Posted 15 December 2009 - 07:51 PM

Well I was most concerned with whether or not people take or leave the trub, and any differences in flavor, not so much whether it's siphoned or drained. I just tried to edit the poll but for some reason it won't let me. Anyways, I'm just trying to get peoples opinions on whether they leave the trub in the kettle or put it into the fermentor with the wort, and if there's any effect on the finished product, regardless of how it gets there (siphon or draining, or otherwise)

Well, there's an effect. There's no debate about that. The question is whether the downsides are a big deal to homebrewers. They are to commercial brewers.

#10 jammer

jammer

    Atomic Chef Runner-Up

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3484 posts
  • LocationPDX

Posted 15 December 2009 - 07:56 PM

i whirlpool and siphon as much as the wort as i can off the wort and the hops. If i accidently siphon some into the fermenter, no biggie. I'll siphon it off again when it goes into secondary.

#11 BarelyBrews

BarelyBrews

    Frequent Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1631 posts
  • LocationMichigan

Posted 15 December 2009 - 08:06 PM

I pour threw a strainer which helps with aeration, then i leave most of the trub in the brew pot.Then i rack a second time almost always anywhere from 10 days or more to a secondary.

#12 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 16 December 2009 - 03:47 AM

I pour threw a strainer which helps with aeration, then i leave most of the trub in the brew pot.Then i rack a second time almost always anywhere from 10 days or more to a secondary.

I've always done this except I don't leave the trub in the brew pot. Some of it might get caught in the strainer bag but most trub gets through I think. This weekend I'll be trying to whirlpool and carefully siphon to avoid as much as I can.

#13 Stout_fan

Stout_fan

    Frequent Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3218 posts
  • LocationKnoxville, TN

Posted 16 December 2009 - 09:13 AM

I use a CFWC, so all the cold break goes into the fermenter.I use a 5 gal hop bag, so most of the pellet junque stays behind.My drain tube goes down to the center of the BK. I drain until I see mostly hot break remaining, then I stop.So the answer was yea, kind of really, but not exactly and a tad different.Hope this clears things up ;)

#14 beach

beach

    Frequent Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1160 posts
  • LocationMichiana

Posted 16 December 2009 - 05:52 PM

i whirlpool and siphon as much as the wort as i can off the wort and the hops. If i accidently siphon some into the fermenter, no biggie. I'll siphon it off again when it goes into secondary.

This except I don't secondary.

#15 Big Nake

Big Nake

    Comptroller of Forum Content

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 61805 posts

Posted 16 December 2009 - 08:43 PM

My brewpot is a completely vanilla 10-gallon SS Polarware pot... no spigot. So I either have to dump or rack. Since I harvest my yeast to use again and because I like to get my beers as clear as possible, I started allowing everything in the pot to settle so I could rack out the wort, leaving the majority of the Schputz™ behind. I voted that there were more off-flavors with all the break material in there, but I have no real proof of that. Remember that I make wimpy beers compared to many homebrewers and small things could come through easier in my beers. I also remember seeing someplace that it's a good idea to keep the hop & break material out of the primary. Now we need a poll on whether or not you skim the foam (hot break?) off the top of the wort when you're bringing it up to a boil! :D

#16 ThroatwobblerMangrove

ThroatwobblerMangrove

    Open Letter (and similar documents) Comptroller

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4491 posts

Posted 17 December 2009 - 03:44 AM

My brewpot is a completely vanilla 10-gallon SS Polarware pot... no spigot. So I either have to dump or rack. Since I harvest my yeast to use again and because I like to get my beers as clear as possible, I started allowing everything in the pot to settle so I could rack out the wort, leaving the majority of the Schputzâ„¢ behind. I voted that there were more off-flavors with all the break material in there, but I have no real proof of that. Remember that I make wimpy beers compared to many homebrewers and small things could come through easier in my beers. I also remember seeing someplace that it's a good idea to keep the hop & break material out of the primary. Now we need a poll on whether or not you skim the foam (hot break?) off the top of the wort when you're bringing it up to a boil! :D

people actually do that???

#17 Stout_fan

Stout_fan

    Frequent Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3218 posts
  • LocationKnoxville, TN

Posted 17 December 2009 - 07:31 AM

... leaving the majority of the Schputzâ„¢ behind. ...

A variation on Schmutz ?

#18 Big Nake

Big Nake

    Comptroller of Forum Content

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 61805 posts

Posted 17 December 2009 - 07:36 AM

A variation on Schmutz ?

Apparently, yes. I have heard of Schmutz, Schmootz and similar. But don't be fooled by imitations... this is the one and only Schputzâ„¢. It gives my beer that certain... Schputzitude. :D

#19 Spoon

Spoon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 158 posts
  • LocationLower Alabama

Posted 17 December 2009 - 12:33 PM

I siphon as much clear wort as possible but generally end up w/ trub. But I never had any problems. Of couse I brew for me and not to win ribbons so it doesn't make difference to me.

#20 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9104 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 17 December 2009 - 01:00 PM

A guy on HBD tested this a couple years back. He made 2 batches of pils, one with trub and one without. IIRC, the differences were very slight, but he actually preferred the batch with the trub left in.

Edited by denny, 17 December 2009 - 01:01 PM.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users