
Trub: Remove or Leave?
#1
Posted 15 December 2009 - 03:50 PM
#2
Posted 15 December 2009 - 04:09 PM
#3
Posted 15 December 2009 - 04:28 PM
#4
Posted 15 December 2009 - 04:42 PM
#5
Posted 15 December 2009 - 05:27 PM
#6
Posted 15 December 2009 - 05:39 PM
#7
Posted 15 December 2009 - 06:48 PM
#8
Posted 15 December 2009 - 07:24 PM
#9
Posted 15 December 2009 - 07:51 PM
Well, there's an effect. There's no debate about that. The question is whether the downsides are a big deal to homebrewers. They are to commercial brewers.Well I was most concerned with whether or not people take or leave the trub, and any differences in flavor, not so much whether it's siphoned or drained. I just tried to edit the poll but for some reason it won't let me. Anyways, I'm just trying to get peoples opinions on whether they leave the trub in the kettle or put it into the fermentor with the wort, and if there's any effect on the finished product, regardless of how it gets there (siphon or draining, or otherwise)
#10
Posted 15 December 2009 - 07:56 PM
#11
Posted 15 December 2009 - 08:06 PM
#12
Posted 16 December 2009 - 03:47 AM
I've always done this except I don't leave the trub in the brew pot. Some of it might get caught in the strainer bag but most trub gets through I think. This weekend I'll be trying to whirlpool and carefully siphon to avoid as much as I can.I pour threw a strainer which helps with aeration, then i leave most of the trub in the brew pot.Then i rack a second time almost always anywhere from 10 days or more to a secondary.
#13
Posted 16 December 2009 - 09:13 AM

#14
Posted 16 December 2009 - 05:52 PM
This except I don't secondary.i whirlpool and siphon as much as the wort as i can off the wort and the hops. If i accidently siphon some into the fermenter, no biggie. I'll siphon it off again when it goes into secondary.
#15
Posted 16 December 2009 - 08:43 PM

#16
Posted 17 December 2009 - 03:44 AM
people actually do that???My brewpot is a completely vanilla 10-gallon SS Polarware pot... no spigot. So I either have to dump or rack. Since I harvest my yeast to use again and because I like to get my beers as clear as possible, I started allowing everything in the pot to settle so I could rack out the wort, leaving the majority of the Schputzâ„¢ behind. I voted that there were more off-flavors with all the break material in there, but I have no real proof of that. Remember that I make wimpy beers compared to many homebrewers and small things could come through easier in my beers. I also remember seeing someplace that it's a good idea to keep the hop & break material out of the primary. Now we need a poll on whether or not you skim the foam (hot break?) off the top of the wort when you're bringing it up to a boil!
#19
Posted 17 December 2009 - 12:33 PM
#20
Posted 17 December 2009 - 01:00 PM
Edited by denny, 17 December 2009 - 01:01 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users