
Brewbie Bracket Busters - NCAA Bracket
#61
Posted 26 March 2023 - 01:09 PM
#62
Posted 26 March 2023 - 01:37 PM
I think Iowa is the second best team in the country. South Carolina is great again.
That was a foul on Creighton
Edited by Sidney Porter, 26 March 2023 - 01:37 PM.
#63
Posted 26 March 2023 - 02:58 PM

https://www.theadver...or/11538996002/
#64
Posted Yesterday, 07:36 AM
#65
Posted Yesterday, 08:17 AM
#66
Posted Yesterday, 08:20 AM
#67
Posted Yesterday, 08:23 AM
this has got to be one of the most unlikely Final Four's in the past 30yrs. UCONN seems like the only one of the "usual suspects" that made it. no Duke, no UNC, no UK, Cinci, UCLA, Louisville, etc.... kinda cool in a way
#68
Posted Yesterday, 08:46 AM
this has got to be one of the most unlikely Final Four's in the past 30yrs. UCONN seems like the only one of the "usual suspects" that made it. no Duke, no UNC, no UK, Cinci, UCLA, Louisville, etc.... kinda cool in a way
Cincy made your cut? You are going way back to the early 60s
1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1992
#69
Posted Yesterday, 08:50 AM
this has got to be one of the most unlikely Final Four's in the past 30yrs. UCONN seems like the only one of the "usual suspects" that made it. no Duke, no UNC, no UK, Cinci, UCLA, Louisville, etc.... kinda cool in a way
Cinci has been terrible for the better part of a decade, not even in the conversation most of the time.
#70
Posted Yesterday, 08:52 AM
Cincy made your cut? You are going way back to the early 60s
1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1992
what I'm meaning is they are typically a "player", maybe not final four but almost always quite good. I could add Indiana to that but you'd have to go back to Knight days I think but they haven't been a real 'player' in a long time from what I can remember.
Cinci has been terrible for the better part of a decade, not even in the conversation most of the time.
I dont 'follow' basketball except during tourney time. so forgive me for not being 100% up to date on the power players each and every years.
#71
Posted Yesterday, 09:22 AM
#72
Posted Yesterday, 10:15 AM
what I'm meaning is they are typically a "player", maybe not final four but almost always quite good. I could add Indiana to that but you'd have to go back to Knight days I think but they haven't been a real 'player' in a long time from what I can remember.
I dont 'follow' basketball except during tourney time. so forgive me for not being 100% up to date on the power players each and every years.
I went to school there and live in that media market, so I know about them. They suck.
#73
Posted Yesterday, 10:16 AM
I just saw the final four teams, I don't follow march madness at all anymore. Has there ever been a final four with no top 3 seed?
#74
Posted Yesterday, 10:26 AM
#75
Posted Yesterday, 10:37 AM
one would think this has to be the caseI just saw the final four teams, I don't follow march madness at all anymore. Has there ever been a final four with no top 3 seed?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users