Jump to content


Photo

LAPD Officer caught fondling dead victims breastesteses


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#21 93 Percent Peaceful JKor

93 Percent Peaceful JKor

    Puller of Meats

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 49500 posts
  • LocationNW of Boston

Posted 05 December 2019 - 07:12 AM

Maybe just fire him?


  • 0

#22 KSUwildcatFAN

KSUwildcatFAN

    Comptroller of ChopSticks & Ghey Bach Chow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6711 posts
  • LocationKC Area

Posted 05 December 2019 - 08:51 AM

Doing anything sexual with a dead body is severely effed IMO, and also disrespectful to say the least....but is there really a victim?
  • 0

#23 StankDelicious

StankDelicious

    Comptroller of BigBossMan

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13657 posts
  • LocationMarylandistan

Posted 05 December 2019 - 08:56 AM

Doing anything sexual with a dead body is severely effed IMO, and also disrespectful to say the least....but is there really a victim?

 

My lost innocence?


  • 0

#24 Vagus

Vagus

    Just had an organism

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 44415 posts
  • LocationThere

Posted 05 December 2019 - 09:03 AM

My lost innocence?

I've got it locked up safe in the basement if you ever want it back, bro.  


  • 0

#25 Beejus McReejus

Beejus McReejus

    Comptroller of Flying Ducks

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 11058 posts
  • LocationTopeka, KS

Posted 05 December 2019 - 09:06 AM

I've got it locked up safe in the basement if you ever want it back, bro.  

 

Tying that cherry stem into a knot with his tongue, bruh.


Edited by Beejus McReejus, 05 December 2019 - 09:06 AM.

  • 0

#26 Mickey

Mickey

    Comptroller of King Richard V

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 37396 posts
  • LocationYor Mom’s house

Posted 05 December 2019 - 09:07 AM

Doing anything sexual with a dead body is severely effed IMO, and also disrespectful to say the least....but is there really a victim?


There was a “victim” pre grope... She was dead and he was a responding officer.

Edited by Chips O Toole, 05 December 2019 - 09:07 AM.

  • 0

#27 SnowMan

SnowMan

    Advanced Snowman

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9004 posts
  • LocationSunman, IN

Posted 05 December 2019 - 09:15 AM

Doing anything sexual with a dead body is severely effed IMO, and also disrespectful to say the least....but is there really a victim?

 

 

That's kind of where I am.  Fire the guy for violating department policy.  But I'm not sure there is a crime here. 


  • 0

#28 Lee in Texas

Lee in Texas

    Comptroller of Lurking

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2019 posts
  • Locationnear Austin, Texas

Posted 05 December 2019 - 10:45 AM

If that was a friend or relative of mine, officer shit for brains would get a beat down, if not a swastika branded onto his forehead. And a beat down.
  • 0

#29 Trub L

Trub L

    Hooked on a Feelin

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 112411 posts
  • LocationIn the Middle

Posted 05 December 2019 - 11:13 AM

You can't have necrolapdance without lapd

So, in people's minds, is this WORSE than doing it to a live person?
  • 0

#30 KSUwildcatFAN

KSUwildcatFAN

    Comptroller of ChopSticks & Ghey Bach Chow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6711 posts
  • LocationKC Area

Posted 05 December 2019 - 11:22 AM

You can't have necrolapdance without lapd

So, in people's minds, is this WORSE than doing it to a live person?

It's nastier, but not nearly as bad in that there is no real victim imo (due to groping).

I mean if I have to choice I'd rather get butt raped after I'm dead than while I'm alive.

Edited by KSUwildcatFAN, 05 December 2019 - 11:22 AM.

  • 0

#31 Trub L

Trub L

    Hooked on a Feelin

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 112411 posts
  • LocationIn the Middle

Posted 05 December 2019 - 11:24 AM

Kind of my point.

I would even argue that posting the footage damages people more than the actual act being filmed. This should have been dealt with internally.

Edited by Trub L, 05 December 2019 - 11:24 AM.

  • 0

#32 KSUwildcatFAN

KSUwildcatFAN

    Comptroller of ChopSticks & Ghey Bach Chow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6711 posts
  • LocationKC Area

Posted 05 December 2019 - 11:26 AM

Oh, I didn't see where they posted the video.
  • 0

#33 dagomike

dagomike

    Comptroller of CrapPapples

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12838 posts

Posted 05 December 2019 - 12:06 PM

I think the extent of the groping is relevant. Excessive would be disturbing. If he was just curious if they were real or not, for example, then I’d say that’s more of a poor judgement thing and not that big of a deal. Cop shenanigans, if you will.
  • 0

#34 Deerslyr

Deerslyr

    Disliker of Nut Kicking

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23796 posts
  • LocationGod's Country!

Posted 05 December 2019 - 12:11 PM

Likely a felony.

 

 

<Section operative July 1, 2020.  See, also, § 7052 operative until July 1, 2020.>

(a) Every person who willfully mutilates, disinters, removes from the place of interment, or commits an act of sexual penetration on, or has sexual contact with, any remains known to be human, without authority of law, is guilty of a felony.  This section does not apply to any person who, under authority of law, removes the remains for reinterment, or performs a cremation or hydrolysis.

(B) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:

(1) “Sexual penetration” means the unlawful penetration of the vagina or anus, however slight, by any part of a person's body or other object, or any act of sexual contact between the sex organs of a person and the mouth or anus of a dead body, or any oral copulation of a dead human body for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse.

(2) Sexual contact” means any willful touching by a person of an intimate part of a dead human body for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse.

© This section shall become operative on July 1, 2020.


  • 0

#35 Trub L

Trub L

    Hooked on a Feelin

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 112411 posts
  • LocationIn the Middle

Posted 05 December 2019 - 12:13 PM

I think the extent of the groping is relevant. Excessive would be disturbing. If he was just curious if they were real or not, for example, then I’d say that’s more of a poor judgement thing and not that big of a deal. Cop shenanigans, if you will.


Would give a new meaning to DTF, anyway.
  • 0

#36 Zaphod_Beeblebrox

Zaphod_Beeblebrox

    Comptroller of Nothing

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 45718 posts

Posted 05 December 2019 - 06:17 PM

I wonder if he had some dead lube on him?
  • 0

#37 Mickey

Mickey

    Comptroller of King Richard V

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 37396 posts
  • LocationYor Mom’s house

Posted 05 December 2019 - 06:19 PM

It’s in the trunk next to the flares, the blow up doll and extra ammo ;)
  • 0

#38 badogg

badogg

    Comptroller of jokes about violence against women

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 27998 posts
  • LocationRight behind you!

Posted 05 December 2019 - 08:11 PM

Likely a felony.


How sad that we need laws for this
  • 0

#39 43hertz

43hertz

    Gold Star Recipient

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8660 posts

Posted 07 December 2019 - 11:02 AM

You can't have necrolapdance without lapd

So, in people's minds, is this WORSE than doing it to a live person?


Al Franken says yes!
  • 0

#40 KSUwildcatFAN

KSUwildcatFAN

    Comptroller of ChopSticks & Ghey Bach Chow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6711 posts
  • LocationKC Area

Posted 07 December 2019 - 11:45 AM

How sad that we need laws for this

Agreed, the human mind is very complicated and frankly the animalistic part is not governed that well by the more refined part.
  • 0


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users