87% Maris Otter (it's not a Belgian Pilsner malt, obviously, but all I've got on hand as a base malt)6.45% D2 Candy Sugar3.23% Caramunich1.61% Special B1.61% Chocolate Wheat Malt
Mash at 150. About 1.069 OG and 22 IBUs from some 60 minute addition.I plan on getting either medium toast American or French oak chips. I've heard the American ones are more aggressive, which makes me want to stay away from them, though I've also heard they have a nice vanilla component, which makes me want to use them...What is the Board's impression on either American or French, how much should be used in a five gallon batch, and for how long for my desired effect? I can't keg, so adding them to the keg and sampling until I've reached a desired profile is not really possible.Oak
#1
Posted 09 November 2009 - 05:39 AM
#2
Posted 09 November 2009 - 06:42 AM
#3
Posted 09 November 2009 - 06:52 AM
#4
Posted 09 November 2009 - 06:56 AM
#5
Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:02 AM
#6
Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:09 AM
#7
Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:19 AM
I don't see any issues with mixing and matching. Again be careful with the quantity unless you are going to taste frequently and are ready to move it on a moments notice.It sounds like a blend of oak cubes might be nice. Maybe .75 oz French medium toast and .5 oz of Hungarian medium toast for about 2 weeks? Or would this just muddle the flavor?
#8
Posted 09 November 2009 - 06:08 PM
#9
Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:16 PM
Thanks, I'll definitely keep this in mind, and would prefer the more complex flavors you speak of. My beer will be about 7-7.25%, depending on attenuation. What do you think using about 5 oz (3 french and 2 hungarian) for three weeks? In your experience, after three weeks in the keg with about this much oak, what could I expect?A blend would definitely be nice, but like strangebrewer cautioned, I think those amounts you are thinking of is too much. I only use oak on beers that can handle the complexity, and then I only use 3/4oz to 1oz, but this is for beers that are in the 10+ range (barleywines and DIPAs). For a smaller beer, I wouldn't go more than .5 oz at first. If you need another carboy, this could be an opportunity for you to get another carboy so you can do experiments like this more often in the future.What is interesting about oak, is that you get different flavors depending on how long the oak is in contact with the beer. If you oak too much at the forefront, you will only get the tannic oak flavors and char, which is great if that is what you want. That isn't all I want from oak though, I prefer the more complex flavors, so I oak less, and will keep the oak in the keg until the very end, and it will continue to impart more complex flavors as the beer ages with the oak in it.I do the same thing with my meads, and will try doing it with my ciders as well.
#10
Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:33 PM
#11
Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:44 PM
#12
Posted 09 November 2009 - 08:29 PM
Oops. Yeah, .5 oz. Typed that quickly before my computer died.is that 5 oz or .5oz?
#13
Posted 09 November 2009 - 08:35 PM
I brewed a dubbel a while back while I was still doing extract, and it didn't turn out that great. But truly my inspiration is in the fact that I've had many commercial dubbels, but none with the oak character. I've also had a bunch of sours recently, many of which have come with an oak flavor, and wanted to try it on one of my recent brews. I thought a belgian dubbel might be a nice opportunity. I really don't want much oak character, just an underlying tone as a complement, which is why I'm trying to be as cautionary as possible.Have you brewed a dubbel previously and found it lacking in some sense? Just trying to figure out the oak inspiration. I'm not a fan of adding wood to beers and dubbels have enough complexity where I don't think they need oak. That's just my lousy opinion.
#14
Posted 09 November 2009 - 08:46 PM
This makes sense. I was just wondering because I've never done such a thing, not saying that it could not be done with good results. I think you are right erring on the side of caution, subtlety is the keyI brewed a dubbel a while back while I was still doing extract, and it didn't turn out that great. But truly my inspiration is in the fact that I've had many commercial dubbels, but none with the oak character. I've also had a bunch of sours recently, many of which have come with an oak flavor, and wanted to try it on one of my recent brews. I thought a belgian dubbel might be a nice opportunity. I really don't want much oak character, just an underlying tone as a complement, which is why I'm trying to be as cautionary as possible.
#15
Posted 09 November 2009 - 08:51 PM
#16
Posted 10 November 2009 - 08:37 PM
#17
Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:53 PM
#18
Posted 11 November 2009 - 06:48 AM
#19
Posted 11 November 2009 - 09:54 AM
#20
Posted 11 November 2009 - 01:34 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users