Immersion Wort Chiller Construction Tips
#1
Posted 10 April 2009 - 03:44 AM
#2
Posted 10 April 2009 - 04:01 AM
#3
Posted 10 April 2009 - 04:32 AM
#4
Posted 10 April 2009 - 05:58 AM
#5
Posted 10 April 2009 - 06:13 AM
#6
Posted 10 April 2009 - 06:31 AM
+1 This is what I did. My compression fittings leak a little and when I get a chance (read remember next time at Big Box store) I'll switch to soldered connections.I've heard that wrapping it around a keg works great, or whatever else you have that's the size you want.I have compression fittings on mine (from B3), but if I ever re-do it they'll just be sweated on, it's simpler for me and I have some soldering skilz.I ended up taking some 10Ga bare copper and weaving it between the coils on the chiller at 3 places spaced around. it keeps the whole thing rigid, but also keeps the coils nicely spaced apart for maximum copper exposure and wort circulation when stirring during the chill. I think the spacing knocked a bit of time off the cooldown.
#7
Posted 12 April 2009 - 03:42 PM
#8
Posted 12 April 2009 - 04:57 PM
#9
Posted 12 April 2009 - 06:25 PM
#10
Posted 13 April 2009 - 03:40 AM
Realistically, it doesn't matter. Theoretically, it would be better for the cold water to start at the top where the wort is the hottest (provided there is no agitation) and there is a bigger deltaT.Thanks for the glove/wet rag trick. I have to say I have been practicing the sweating lately, and I am getting better. I am left with some ugliness, but it doesnt leak. It would be nice to clean it up.Which end of the tubing do you guys make the input? The end that goes straight to the bottom of the chiller or the end that spirals down from the top?
#11
Posted 13 April 2009 - 04:39 AM
I can't recall how the heat transfer function goes. Does it get exponentially larger as deltaT increases or is it more of a log function?Realistically, it doesn't matter. Theoretically, it would be better for the cold water to start at the top where the wort is the hottest (provided there is no agitation) and there is a bigger deltaT.Thanks for the glove/wet rag trick. I have to say I have been practicing the sweating lately, and I am getting better. I am left with some ugliness, but it doesnt leak. It would be nice to clean it up.
#12
Posted 13 April 2009 - 05:23 PM
Linear with ▲T.Newton's Law of Cooling:Q = hA(Thot-Tcold)Q ≡ Heat transfer rate (W/m²)h ≡ Heat transfer coefficient (W/m²-K)A ≡ Area (m²)Tcold is your cooling water temp (or more technically, the temperature of the surface of the copper tubing), Thot is the temp of the wort (in this case, not the wort right next to chiller, but outside the 'boundary layer', this is often called T∞).In a typical wort cooling application the driving factor is h. The difference in h between a still wort and an agitated wort is probably 25-100 fold. Moral of the story...stir your wort while cooling.I can't recall how the heat transfer function goes. Does it get exponentially larger as deltaT increases or is it more of a log function?
#13
Posted 13 April 2009 - 05:51 PM
oh heck yeah, it makes a huge difference.Moral of the story...stir your wort while cooling.
#14
Posted 13 April 2009 - 05:58 PM
#15
Posted 13 April 2009 - 06:32 PM
I thought about making Jamil's recirc deal with the IC. But since my pump and hoses are done for the day after mashing I didn't want the additional cleanup time to sanitize the pump and hoses late in the session. I had an old gearmotor that didn't work out for the EHLT. It works great as a stirrer with the IC. No more stirring for 20+ minutes and it's more effective than doing it by hand. Cut my cooling time by at least 25%. Guess that's one of the pia's with 10+ gal batches.Another IC tip, solder some GH fittings to the IC and then add some GH QD's. Makes that part of the brewday a breeze.oh heck yeah, it makes a huge difference.
#16
Posted 13 April 2009 - 09:01 PM
I am going to make one of these soon. Did a joint brew at a neighbor's house the other weekend and he'd just recently bought the B3 version. We got 10 gallons of Stout down to 68 dF (with San Diego tap water) in 18 minutes if I recall. I like the fact that you leave all that break material behind too. I was always skeptical of that since you need to pump and recirc the wort but after that one session I am sold. Regarding the fittings it seems like I am the only one using tubing and hose-clamps on my IC? I use barbed adapters for all my QD fittings. Works fine for me, but it wasn't a conscious choice - just the way my IC came from the LHBS way back in the day...I thought about making Jamil's recirc deal with the IC.
#17
Posted 14 April 2009 - 03:37 AM
I am in the process of going to the motor stirred cooling. I have dont the recirc method ala Jamil, and I have not had great success with it. I am pretty sure it is all my problem though. What did you use for a paddle/propeller on that motor?I thought about making Jamil's recirc deal with the IC. But since my pump and hoses are done for the day after mashing I didn't want the additional cleanup time to sanitize the pump and hoses late in the session. I had an old gearmotor that didn't work out for the EHLT. It works great as a stirrer with the IC. No more stirring for 20+ minutes and it's more effective than doing it by hand. Cut my cooling time by at least 25%. Guess that's one of the pia's with 10+ gal batches.Another IC tip, solder some GH fittings to the IC and then add some GH QD's. Makes that part of the brewday a breeze.
#18
Posted 14 April 2009 - 04:02 AM
Not much, 1/2" copper pipe with a tee and flattened pipe........What did you use for a paddle/propeller on that motor?
#19
Posted 14 April 2009 - 07:44 AM
#20
Posted 14 April 2009 - 10:43 AM
+1 to the QD's. I switch from tap water to recirculating ice water and before I got my splitter valve on the inlet the QD's were money.Another IC tip, solder some GH fittings to the IC and then add some GH QD's. Makes that part of the brewday a breeze.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users