Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Brewing a historic porter


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 strangebrewer

strangebrewer

    Frequent Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1499 posts
  • LocationDenver, CO

Posted 09 April 2009 - 09:37 AM

Anybody ever brewed this style? Any experiences to share? I'm going to take a stab at it this weekend.Lots of choices for low attenuating english ale yeasts but I'd prefer one that doesn't throw too too many fruity esters. Any favorite strains of low attenuating english ale yeasts? Diacetyl is no problem since Brett will clean it up. I've got a pure culture of Brett. Lambicus that I plan to pitch towards the end of primary and then leaving it in primary until... well I feel like transferring it :covreyes: Grain bill will be along the lines of 30% pale, 30% amber malt, 30% darker malts. Probably Fuggle or EKG for the hop since I have a bit around.Thoughts? Opinions?

#2 Lagerdemain

Lagerdemain

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 148 posts

Posted 09 April 2009 - 09:52 AM

Anybody ever brewed this style? Any experiences to share? I'm going to take a stab at it this weekend.Lots of choices for low attenuating english ale yeasts but I'd prefer one that doesn't throw too too many fruity esters. Any favorite strains of low attenuating english ale yeasts? Diacetyl is no problem since Brett will clean it up. I've got a pure culture of Brett. Lambicus that I plan to pitch towards the end of primary and then leaving it in primary until... well I feel like transferring it :covreyes: Grain bill will be along the lines of 30% pale, 30% amber malt, 30% darker malts. Probably Fuggle or EKG for the hop since I have a bit around.Thoughts? Opinions?

I guess I'm curious why you believe brettanomyces is an essential element of a historic English porter. It certainly wouldn't have been used intentionally by any of the English porter breweries.

#3 strangebrewer

strangebrewer

    Frequent Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1499 posts
  • LocationDenver, CO

Posted 09 April 2009 - 10:10 AM

I guess I'm curious why you believe brettanomyces is an essential element of a historic English porter. It certainly wouldn't have been used intentionally by any of the English porter breweries.

It's more of a personal twist, definitely not required. I have some lambicus around I'd been wanting to use and looking for a darker beer style to add it to. Historic porter seemed to fit the bill.

#4 MtnBrewer

MtnBrewer

    Skynet Architect

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6695 posts
  • LocationThe Springs

Posted 09 April 2009 - 10:16 AM

I guess I'm curious why you believe brettanomyces is an essential element of a historic English porter. It certainly wouldn't have been used intentionally by any of the English porter breweries.

Not intentionally, no. But Brett did originate in Britain (hence the name).

#5 Lagerdemain

Lagerdemain

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 148 posts

Posted 09 April 2009 - 10:35 AM

It's more of a personal twist, definitely not required. I have some lambicus around I'd been wanting to use and looking for a darker beer style to add it to. Historic porter seemed to fit the bill.

Understood. You might also consider an old ale or stock ale - I would consider those as more likely to have notable brett character than porter, which would be consumed rather rapidly after being brewed, and therefore wouldn't be as likely to have a secondary brett fermentation.

#6 BikeBrewer

BikeBrewer

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 362 posts
  • LocationKitchener, Ontario

Posted 09 April 2009 - 11:36 AM

How would that work with an IPA? Would the larger hops additions restrict the Brett noticably, or would it still be fermented out by the Brett and then remain more stable?

#7 Jimmy James

Jimmy James

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 483 posts
  • LocationSan Diego, CA

Posted 09 April 2009 - 11:39 AM

Understood. You might also consider an old ale or stock ale - I would consider those as more likely to have notable brett character than porter, which would be consumed rather rapidly after being brewed, and therefore wouldn't be as likely to have a secondary brett fermentation.

I would also consider lager's thoughts on old ale. Throw in some treacle to the wort and let it sit for as long as you can keep your hands off it.

#8 EWW

EWW

    Regular, normal human being

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 26185 posts
  • LocationSomewhere special

Posted 09 April 2009 - 04:30 PM

WLP002 fermented at 62-65*F seems like the best answer for this when it comes to yeast. I've brewed a few historic porters but none with brett, but I don't think I would use brett L. I would personally go with brett C in secondary if you can get your hands on it since it was isolated from some British ales. If you go with the recipe %s you listed I think you will be good, but I would recommend you go 2:1 ratio of brown malt and black patent. No matter what you do please post some results as I'm curious how this one turns out.

#9 strangebrewer

strangebrewer

    Frequent Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1499 posts
  • LocationDenver, CO

Posted 09 April 2009 - 06:46 PM

WLP002 fermented at 62-65*F seems like the best answer for this when it comes to yeast. I've brewed a few historic porters but none with brett, but I don't think I would use brett L. I would personally go with brett C in secondary if you can get your hands on it since it was isolated from some British ales. If you go with the recipe %s you listed I think you will be good, but I would recommend you go 2:1 ratio of brown malt and black patent. No matter what you do please post some results as I'm curious how this one turns out.

I'll see if I can round up WLP002 but chances are I'll end up with the WYeast equivilant 1968 London ESB. I brewed a pale ale and a brown ale in 3 gallon batches to experiment with Brett C and honestly I was very underwhelmed. They fermented out with very little of the brett character I was after. I've done an old ale and a scottish ale with Brett B. that came out great. I think I personally prefer the stronger strains of Brett. This will be my first time outside of a lambic using Brett L. It's supposed to be the strongest of the bunch so my thinking is to match it up against something strong.I've got a 1/2# of chocolate malt and 1/4# of black patent I was planning to add to the grain bill so I'm in line there. Either way results will be posted!

#10 *_Guest_BigBossMan_*

*_Guest_BigBossMan_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 April 2009 - 01:40 AM

I'll see if I can round up WLP002 but chances are I'll end up with the WYeast equivilant 1968 London ESB. I brewed a pale ale and a brown ale in 3 gallon batches to experiment with Brett C and honestly I was very underwhelmed. They fermented out with very little of the brett character I was after. I've done an old ale and a scottish ale with Brett B. that came out great. I think I personally prefer the stronger strains of Brett. This will be my first time outside of a lambic using Brett L. It's supposed to be the strongest of the bunch so my thinking is to match it up against something strong.I've got a 1/2# of chocolate malt and 1/4# of black patent I was planning to add to the grain bill so I'm in line there. Either way results will be posted!

What about Wyeast 1099 Whitbread Ale Yeast?

A mildly malty and slightly fruity fermentation profile; not as tart and dry as 1098 and much more flocculant. Clears well without filtration. Apparent attenuation: 68-72%. Flocculation: high. Optimum temp: 64°-75° F



#11 ChefLamont

ChefLamont

    Comptroller of Fear

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9734 posts
  • LocationAtlanta

Posted 10 April 2009 - 03:23 AM

Depending on how "historical" you want to make it and what time period you want to hit, I would add a bit of smoked malt as well. Porter, as a style was developed in the 1720s. Technology and practice didn't completely remove the smoke flavor from the malting process until around the 1820s. I don't think it would have necessarily been a real smoky beer, but a couple of handfuls of smoked malt in your grist would not be out of place.my $0.02


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users