rainwater beer
#1
Posted 05 October 2009 - 06:05 AM
#2
Posted 05 October 2009 - 06:36 AM
#3
Posted 05 October 2009 - 06:41 AM
Damn, I;ve been doing it wrong all these years!"Well, for instance, home brewers don't make the malt blend because it takes too much space and equipment," he said. "Home brewers usually just start with an extract."Oh really?- Jim
#4
Posted 05 October 2009 - 07:00 AM
yes - I cringed as wellDamn, I;ve been doing it wrong all these years!
#5
Posted 05 October 2009 - 04:55 PM
He is probably right, most homebrewer's use extract. I think for most of use homebrew is our top (or close to it) hobby. You have people that only brew 1 or 2 batches a year, they brew extract. So in raw numbers if they get the same weight I could see his statement being correct."Well, for instance, home brewers don't make the malt blend because it takes too much space and equipment," he said. "Home brewers usually just start with an extract."Oh really?- Jim
#6
Posted 06 October 2009 - 03:56 AM
I wonder if you weighted it by gallons brewed how it would turn out...He is probably right, most homebrewer's use extract. I think for most of use homebrew is our top (or close to it) hobby. You have people that only brew 1 or 2 batches a year, they brew extract. So in raw numbers if they get the same weight I could see his statement being correct.
#7
Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:34 AM
#8
Posted 06 October 2009 - 05:38 AM
I would think that would be extremely cost prohibitive. What breweries do this??"Home brewers usually just start with an extract."Yea, then we get better. Some pro breweries actually do use extract.Oddly their beer always have this watery quality.For those on the left coast, think Chinese coal fired power plants and acid rain.
#9
Posted 06 October 2009 - 06:17 AM
There is a brewery on Amelia Island, that has a system that is pretty much a glorified Mr Beer kit. I think they "brew" 2 beers and blend to serve 4. The owener doesn't really know anything about brewing, the recipes come pre-package. The recipes are supplied by the same people that made the equipment. So there are probably other brewpubs that use this system.There was also a brewpub on the west cost that was on the brewing network that brewed with extract. It was a space issue with them they only had room for a kettle. He did the more traditional steeping with extract (rather than the above).I would think that would be extremely cost prohibitive. What breweries do this??
#10
Posted 06 October 2009 - 01:39 PM
#11
Posted 08 October 2009 - 05:14 PM
When the first started Wild Goose ( I think that's the name) used DME exclusively with that unique mouth feel attributable only to those 'quality' ingredients. Then bought out by Clipper City. Hugh did not retain the questionable practice.I would think that would be extremely cost prohibitive. What breweries do this??
#12
Posted 09 October 2009 - 10:45 PM
#13
Posted 10 October 2009 - 04:25 AM
I concur.Rainwater beer? Just a gimmick. If you like gimmicks, I guess using rainwater is as innocuous as any other, but it's not going to result in some magical product you couldn't get to by starting with deionized, distilled, or R/O water. What's the saying? If the emperor's new clothes fit, wear them!
#14
Posted 10 October 2009 - 04:51 AM
#15
Posted 10 October 2009 - 04:54 AM
Maybe a large funnel shaped collector?? No idea...I do agree that I believe the rainwater use for brewing is a marketing ploy and yes gimmicky too. Rainwater does have minerals in it but it also has contaminants too. I think the posting I saw on a different place in ATL did filter their water. My thought is this ATL must get a heck of a lot of rain or something. If I collected rainwater to brew I would be lucky to brew 5 batches of beer a year. How can they collect that volume of water from the rain for a commercial batch of beer? Seriously?? Oh well definitely a marketing ploy.
#16
Posted 10 October 2009 - 06:51 AM
No idea how they do it but most places (non-breweries) that are collecting large amounts of rain water, collect the runnings off of their roof and channel it all into their collecting vessel. I knew a guy how collected rain water that way to water his lawn.I do agree that I believe the rainwater use for brewing is a marketing ploy and yes gimmicky too. Rainwater does have minerals in it but it also has contaminants too. I think the posting I saw on a different place in ATL did filter their water. My thought is this ATL must get a heck of a lot of rain or something. If I collected rainwater to brew I would be lucky to brew 5 batches of beer a year. How can they collect that volume of water from the rain for a commercial batch of beer? Seriously?? Oh well definitely a marketing ploy.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users