Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Drez's Chinook/Citra/Simcoe


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#1 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18047 posts

Posted 22 June 2015 - 05:03 AM

As requested here is the recipe. This is a house favorite and people really seem to like it.

6g post boil

Mash temp 148

OG – 1.055 (70% eff on my system)

FG- 1.010-1.012 ( most of the time)
Grist
72% ( 9#) Pils
24% (3#) Marris Otter
4% (.5#) Caravienne

Hops
10Chinook @90 10% [color=#FF0000;]- 15.2 IBU[/color]
28g Chinook @ 10 13% [color=#FF0000;]- 8.5 IBU[/color]
14g Citra @10 13% [color=#FF0000;]- 10.2 IBU[/color]
56g Chinook @whirlpool@ 175 10%
28g Citra @whirlpool@ 175 13%
28g Chinook @DH
28g Citra @DH
56g Simcoe @ DH
Dry Hopping done at 65* for about 4-5 days
Yeast
S-05, 1318, M-29 etc.  I still like the beer best with Chico but I am playing with some other yeasts too.
Water
Calcium – 103
Sulfate – 160
Chloride – 56

pH=5.32

 

 



#2 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16518 posts

Posted 22 June 2015 - 07:05 AM

I made this recently with WY1450 and just added the dry hops to the primary yesterday. Preliminary "testing" indicates very positive results.



#3 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 22 June 2015 - 07:06 AM

I made this recently with WY1450 and just added the dry hops to the primary yesterday. Preliminary "testing" indicates very positive results.

 

yeah - I can imagine that would be a good yeast for this.



#4 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18047 posts

Posted 22 June 2015 - 07:17 AM

I made this recently with WY1450 and just added the dry hops to the primary yesterday. Preliminary "testing" indicates very positive results.

 

yeah - I can imagine that would be a good yeast for this.

Grumble .. Grumble .. grumble

 

:P :D



#5 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 22 June 2015 - 07:36 AM

Grumble .. Grumble .. grumble

 

:P :D

 

:D



#6 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16518 posts

Posted 08 July 2015 - 05:50 AM

I made this recently with WY1450 and just added the dry hops to the primary yesterday. Preliminary "testing" indicates very positive results.

Indeed, very positive results. We went through a lot of this over the holiday weekend. If anyone is looking for a well dialed hoppy and delicious APA look no further. Make this.  Very highly recommended. Props to drez.



#7 matt6150

matt6150

    Moderately Accelerated Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10544 posts
  • LocationMooresville, NC

Posted 08 July 2015 - 06:09 AM

Indeed, very positive results. We went through a lot of this over the holiday weekend. If anyone is looking for a well dialed hoppy and delicious APA look no further. Make this.  Very highly recommended. Props to drez.

So out of curiosity what were your FG and OG numbers for yours with 1450?



#8 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16518 posts

Posted 08 July 2015 - 06:14 AM

So out of curiosity what were your FG and OG numbers for yours with 1450?

 

1.054-->1.011


Edited by nettles, 08 July 2015 - 06:14 AM.


#9 matt6150

matt6150

    Moderately Accelerated Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10544 posts
  • LocationMooresville, NC

Posted 08 July 2015 - 06:42 AM

1.054-->1.011

So about 80% attenuation if I'm figuring that right. That's better than I ever get from that yeast. But then again I get low 70's from every yeast I use it seems.



#10 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16518 posts

Posted 08 July 2015 - 06:44 AM

So about 80% attenuation if I'm figuring that right. That's better than I ever get from that yeast. But then again I get low 70's from every yeast I use it seems.

1056/1272/1450 all seem to attenuate very similarly for me.



#11 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18047 posts

Posted 08 July 2015 - 07:30 AM

Indeed, very positive results. We went through a lot of this over the holiday weekend. If anyone is looking for a well dialed hoppy and delicious APA look no further. Make this.  Very highly recommended. Props to drez.

Thanks for the kind words, this really is a wonderful beer and I am glad you enjoyed what the recipe did for you.


So about 80% attenuation if I'm figuring that right. That's better than I ever get from that yeast. But then again I get low 70's from every yeast I use it seems.

 

You and me .. eye to eye!!



#12 matt6150

matt6150

    Moderately Accelerated Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10544 posts
  • LocationMooresville, NC

Posted 08 July 2015 - 08:03 AM

Thanks for the kind words, this really is a wonderful beer and I am glad you enjoyed what the recipe did for you.


 

You and me .. eye to eye!!

Really, so you have attenuation issues as well? I thought it was just me. I'm talking every yeast here across the board, not just 1450.


Edited by matt6150, 08 July 2015 - 08:03 AM.


#13 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18047 posts

Posted 08 July 2015 - 08:08 AM

Really, so you have attenuation issues as well? I thought it was just me. I'm talking every yeast here across the board, not just 1450.

I miss took your comment.  My issue is 1450 related.  sorry.



#14 matt6150

matt6150

    Moderately Accelerated Member

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10544 posts
  • LocationMooresville, NC

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:10 AM

I miss took your comment.  My issue is 1450 related.  sorry.

Yeah I figured. I'm still trying to figure my issue out. Like nettles 1056/1272/1450/US-05 all attenuate very similar, but it's in the low 70's



#15 3rd party JKor

3rd party JKor

    Puller of Meats

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 63966 posts
  • LocationNW of Boston

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:12 AM

That is weird. I almost never have the chico strain do less than 75%.

#16 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 14 December 2016 - 06:56 AM

I made this recently with WY1450 and just added the dry hops to the primary yesterday. Preliminary "testing" indicates very positive results.

 

doing this next week!  I'm excited.



#17 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16518 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 07:19 AM

Can't go wrong. What yeast will you throw at it?



#18 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 14 December 2016 - 07:31 AM

Can't go wrong. What yeast will you throw at it?

 

oh, I quoted you b/c it will be 1450.



#19 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16518 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 07:44 AM

oh, I quoted you b/c it will be 1450.

My favorite yeast these days for hoppy beers.

 

Drez, any recent changes or recommendations for this recipe?



#20 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18047 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 09:11 AM

My favorite yeast these days for hoppy beers.

 

Drez, any recent changes or recommendations for this recipe?

Not really to be honest.  I throw in a # of wheat sometimes just to use it up but other than that I like the original best.  As for yeast 1450 does a great job with it.  I think this will be one of my first beers of 2017 and I will be splitting it between two yeast to experiment.  Probably 1272 and 002 but I am not sure yet.   Something else I have been pondering is skipping the WP addition and just add it at day 3 in the fermenter and then follow up with the standard DH addition.  I have stated before but that seems to be a new trend, just bitter and then save it all for the dry hop.  I still think I am going to want a 5 minute addition though.  I have never been thrilled with what I get out of the WP even at different temps and times. 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users